Ambiguous Responses - Revision history

Staffan Björk at 08:03, 27 July 2015

2015-07-27T08:03:53Z

Staffan Björk at 08:07, 30 July 2014

2014-07-30T08:07:35Z

Staffan Björk at 09:15, 28 June 2014

2014-06-28T09:15:58Z

Staffan Björk: /* Using the pattern */

2014-06-28T09:15:26Z

‎Using the pattern

Staffan Björk at 09:13, 28 June 2014

2014-06-28T09:13:22Z

Staffan Björk at 09:10, 28 June 2014

2014-06-28T09:10:33Z

Staffan Björk at 09:05, 28 June 2014

2014-06-28T09:05:59Z

Staffan Björk: /* Narrative Aspects */

2014-06-28T09:05:40Z

‎Narrative Aspects

Staffan Björk: /* References */

2014-06-28T09:05:31Z

‎References

Staffan Björk at 09:04, 28 June 2014

2014-06-28T09:04:36Z

@@ Line 18: / Line 18: @@
 Creating [[Ambiguous Responses]], or the possibility for it, in a game depend mainly on how to modify the [[Information Passing]] that occurs in it. Naturally, free-text communication between humans, e.g. through [[Chat Channels]], makes the presence of [[Ambiguous Responses]] possible but does not guarantee that it occurs. [[Dialogues]], being more structured, can enforce that at least some options are [[Ambiguous Responses]] both from [[Player Characters]] and [[Non-Player Characters]] but making all options such for players can remove the sense of [[Freedom of Choice]] for players.
-Allowing [[Algorithmic Agents]] to provide [[Ambiguous Responses]] is another possibility, but unless their options in [[Dialogues]] are tagged as ambiguous it can require significant development of AI systems to make them able to provide intentional ones. [[ELIZA]] shows another design strategy for ambiguous [[Algorithmic Agents]] where all responses possible are precisely ambiguous and the [[Algorithmic Agents|[[Algorithmic Agent]] has no internal model of what the meaning of the conversation is.
+Allowing [[Algorithmic Agents]] to provide [[Ambiguous Responses]] is another possibility, but unless their options in [[Dialogues]] are tagged as ambiguous it can require significant development of AI systems to make them able to provide intentional ones. [[ELIZA]] shows another design strategy for ambiguous [[Algorithmic Agents]] where all responses possible are precisely ambiguous and the [[Algorithmic Agents|Algorithmic Agent]] has no internal model of what the meaning of the conversation is.
 === Interface Aspects ===

@@ Line 24: / Line 24: @@
 === Narrative Aspects ===
-[[Ambiguous Responses]] is one of the prime vehicles for setting up the misunderstandings in ''comedies of errors''<ref name="comedy_of_errors"/>. As such, the pattern can be used to create certain blocks in [[Narration Structures]].
+[[Ambiguous Responses]] is one of the prime vehicles for setting up the misunderstandings in ''comedies of errors''<ref name="comedy_of_errors"/>. As such, the pattern can be used to create certain blocks in [[Predetermined Story Structures]].
 == Consequences ==
@@ Line 31: / Line 31: @@
 == Relations ==
 === Can Instantiate ===
-[[Narration Structures]],
+[[Predetermined Story Structures]],
 [[Tension]],
 [[Uncertainty of Information]]

@@ Line 18: / Line 18: @@
 Creating [[Ambiguous Responses]], or the possibility for it, in a game depend mainly on how to modify the [[Information Passing]] that occurs in it. Naturally, free-text communication between humans, e.g. through [[Chat Channels]], makes the presence of [[Ambiguous Responses]] possible but does not guarantee that it occurs. [[Dialogues]], being more structured, can enforce that at least some options are [[Ambiguous Responses]] both from [[Player Characters]] and [[Non-Player Characters]] but making all options such for players can remove the sense of [[Freedom of Choice]] for players.
-Allowing [[Algorithmic Agents]] to provide [[Ambiguous Responses]] is another possibility, but unless their options in [[Dialogues]] are tagged as ambiguous it can require significant development of AI systems to make them able to provide intentional ones. [[Eliza]] shows another design strategy for ambiguous [[Algorithmic Agents]] where all responses possible are precisely ambiguous and the [[Algorithmic Agents|[[Algorithmic Agent]] has no internal model of what the meaning of the conversation is.
+Allowing [[Algorithmic Agents]] to provide [[Ambiguous Responses]] is another possibility, but unless their options in [[Dialogues]] are tagged as ambiguous it can require significant development of AI systems to make them able to provide intentional ones. [[ELIZA]] shows another design strategy for ambiguous [[Algorithmic Agents]] where all responses possible are precisely ambiguous and the [[Algorithmic Agents|[[Algorithmic Agent]] has no internal model of what the meaning of the conversation is.
 === Interface Aspects ===

@@ Line 18: / Line 18: @@
 Creating [[Ambiguous Responses]], or the possibility for it, in a game depend mainly on how to modify the [[Information Passing]] that occurs in it. Naturally, free-text communication between humans, e.g. through [[Chat Channels]], makes the presence of [[Ambiguous Responses]] possible but does not guarantee that it occurs. [[Dialogues]], being more structured, can enforce that at least some options are [[Ambiguous Responses]] both from [[Player Characters]] and [[Non-Player Characters]] but making all options such for players can remove the sense of [[Freedom of Choice]] for players.
-Allowing [[Algorithmic Agents]] to provide [[Ambiguous Responses]] is another possibility, but unless their options in [[Dialogues]] are tagged as ambiguous it can require significant development of AI systems to make them able to provide these.
+Allowing [[Algorithmic Agents]] to provide [[Ambiguous Responses]] is another possibility, but unless their options in [[Dialogues]] are tagged as ambiguous it can require significant development of AI systems to make them able to provide intentional ones. [[Eliza]] shows another design strategy for ambiguous [[Algorithmic Agents]] where all responses possible are precisely ambiguous and the [[Algorithmic Agents|[[Algorithmic Agent]] has no internal model of what the meaning of the conversation is.
-−
 === Interface Aspects ===
+-

@@ Line 5: / Line 5: @@
 [[Category:Needs references]]
 [[Category:Needs examples]]
 [[Category:To be Published]]
 ''The ability of agents to gives responses that can be interpreted in two or more ways.''
@@ Line 18: / Line 17: @@
 == Using the pattern ==
 Creating [[Ambiguous Responses]], or the possibility for it, in a game depend mainly on how to modify the [[Information Passing]] that occurs in it. Naturally, free-text communication between humans, e.g. through [[Chat Channels]], makes the presence of [[Ambiguous Responses]] possible but does not guarantee that it occurs. [[Dialogues]], being more structured, can enforce that at least some options are [[Ambiguous Responses]] both from [[Player Characters]] and [[Non-Player Characters]] but making all options such for players can remove the sense of [[Freedom of Choice]] for players.
 === Interface Aspects ===

@@ Line 14: / Line 14: @@
 === Examples ===
-As a currently [[Category:Speculative Patterns|Speculative Pattern]], no examples are listen here.
+As a currently [[:Category:Speculative Patterns|Speculative Pattern]], no examples are listen here.
 == Using the pattern ==

@@ Line 57: / Line 57: @@
 == References ==
 <references>
 <ref name="Lankoski & Björk 2007">Lankoski, P. & Björk, S. (2007) Gameplay Design Patterns for Believable Non-Player Characters. Proceedings of DiGRA 2007.</ref>
 </references>
 == Acknowledgments ==