Team Strategy Identification - Revision history

Staffan Björk: /* Interface Aspects */

2018-03-18T12:48:18Z

‎Interface Aspects

2015-08-02T16:39:27Z

2015-07-31T20:43:43Z

2015-07-31T20:43:04Z

2014-12-10T12:43:32Z

2014-12-10T12:43:16Z

2014-12-10T12:39:18Z

2014-12-10T12:28:55Z

‎Using the pattern

2014-12-10T12:27:35Z

2014-12-10T12:25:50Z

@@ Line 18: / Line 18: @@
 === Interface Aspects ===
-The presences of [[Mini-maps]] can help with [[Team Strategy Identification]] in games with [[Teams]] since in these cases the [[Mini-Maps]] can show the location of team members and players can to a certain extent find strategies solely on the knowledge of where the other players are.
+The presences of [[Mini-maps]] can help with [[Team Strategy Identification]] in games with [[Teams]] since in these cases the [[Mini-maps]] can show the location of team members and players can to a certain extent find strategies solely on the knowledge of where the other players are.
 == Consequences ==

@@ Line 22: / Line 22: @@
 == Consequences ==
 [[Negotiation]] is a typically consequence of trying to reach [[Team Strategy Identification]]. When strategies related to this are successfully identified, these can be perceived as [[Team Accomplishments]] and be [[Social Rewards]] for those active in the identification. Both identifying the strategy and being a part of that strategy can give a sense of [[Togetherness]]. A typical result of [[Team Strategy Identification]] is the discovery or planned use of [[Team Combos]].
 == Relations ==
@@ Line 29: / Line 31: @@
 [[Team Combos]],
 [[Social Rewards]],
 [[Togetherness]]

@@ Line 21: / Line 21: @@
 == Consequences ==
-[[Negotiation]] is a typically consequence of trying to reach [[Team Strategy Identification]]. When a strategy is successfully identified, this can be perceived as a [[Team Accomplishments]] and be [[Social Rewards]] for those active in the identification. Both identifying the strategy and being a part of that strategy can give a sense of [[Togetherness]]. A typical result of [[Team Strategy Identification]] is the discovery or planned use of [[Team Combos]].
+[[Negotiation]] is a typically consequence of trying to reach [[Team Strategy Identification]]. When strategies related to this are successfully identified, these can be perceived as [[Team Accomplishments]] and be [[Social Rewards]] for those active in the identification. Both identifying the strategy and being a part of that strategy can give a sense of [[Togetherness]]. A typical result of [[Team Strategy Identification]] is the discovery or planned use of [[Team Combos]].
 == Relations ==

@@ Line 21: / Line 21: @@
 == Consequences ==
-[[Negotiation]] is a typically consequence of trying to reach [[Team Strategy Identification]]. When a strategy is successfully identified, this can be perceived as a [[Team Accomplishment]] and be [[Social Rewards]] for those active in the identification. Both identifying the strategy and being a part of that strategy can give a sense of [[Togetherness]]. A typical result of [[Team Strategy Identification]] is the discovery or planned use of [[Team Combos]].
+[[Negotiation]] is a typically consequence of trying to reach [[Team Strategy Identification]]. When a strategy is successfully identified, this can be perceived as a [[Team Accomplishments]] and be [[Social Rewards]] for those active in the identification. Both identifying the strategy and being a part of that strategy can give a sense of [[Togetherness]]. A typical result of [[Team Strategy Identification]] is the discovery or planned use of [[Team Combos]].
 == Relations ==
 === Can Instantiate ===
 [[Negotiation]],
-[[Team Accomplishment]],
+[[Team Accomplishments]],
 [[Team Combos]],
 [[Social Rewards]],

@@ Line 3: / Line 3: @@
 [[Category:Needs revision]]
 [[Category:Needs references]]
 ''Discovering and deciding on a team strategy, often based upon using synergies.''
@@ Line 60: / Line 59: @@
 <ref name="Bergström">Bergström, K., Björk, S. & Lundgren, S. (2010). Exploring Aesthetic Gameplay Design Patterns – Camaraderie in Four Games. Paper presentation at Mindtrek 2010. Tampere, Finland.</ref>
 </references>
 == Acknowledgments ==
+-

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
 [[Category:Patterns]]
 [[Category:Dynamic Patterns]]
 [[Category:Needs revision]]
 [[Category:Needs references]]
 [[Category:Staffan's current workpage]]
 ''Discovering and deciding on a team strategy, often based upon using synergies.''
@@ Line 57: / Line 54: @@
 == History ==
 == References ==
+<references>
 == Acknowledgments ==

@@ Line 17: / Line 17: @@
 == Using the pattern ==
+An exception to the rule that [[Team Strategy Identification]] needs multiple players is when [[AI Players]] can be used. In this case human players need to figure out how the [[AI Players]] function, or to which level they can negotiate over strategies.
-An exception to the rule that [[Team Strategy Identification]] needs multiple player is that
-−
-=== Can Be Instantiated By ===
-[[Internal Conflicts]]
-−
-[[Characters]] together with [[Orthogonal Differentiation]] and [[Teams]]
-−
-[[Mini-maps]] together with [[Teams]]
-−
-[[Multiplayer Games]] together with [[Guilds]], [[Parties]], [[PvE]], or [[Teams]]
-−
-=== Can Be Modulated By ===
-[[AI Players]]
-−
-=== Diegetic Aspects ===
 === Interface Aspects ===
+The presences of [[Mini-maps]] can help with [[Team Strategy Identification]] in games with [[Teams]] since in these cases the [[Mini-Maps]] can show the location of team members and players can to a certain extent find strategies solely on the knowledge of where the other players are.
-=== Narrative Aspects ===
 == Consequences ==

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:28, 10 December 2014
Line 17:		Line 17:

	== Using the pattern ==		== Using the pattern ==
		+
		+
		+	An exception to the rule that [[Team Strategy Identification]] needs multiple player is that

	=== Can Be Instantiated By ===		=== Can Be Instantiated By ===

@@ Line 9: / Line 9: @@
 ''Discovering and deciding on a team strategy, often based upon using synergies.''
-Some games encourage or force players to work together. A part of working together is discovering how one's actions can be coordinated into supporting each other, and
+Some games encourage or force players to work together. A part of working together is discovering how one's actions can be coordinated into supporting each other, and succeeding in finding such cases are examples of [[Team Strategy Identification]].
-This pattern is a still a stub.
+''Note: The use of 'team' in the name of this pattern refers to any type of cooperation between players rather than the more formalized cooperation that the pattern [[Teams]] describe.''
 === Examples ===