The elimination or change of ownership of an game element.
Many games contain events that remove game elements from play. Traditionally this is called to Capture the pieces, even if this may mean removing them or transforming them to so they become another player's pieces.
Note: While Board Games typically use the term Capture, Real-Time Games instead uses Eliminate. For this pattern collection, Eliminate is seen as a more specific form of Capture due to being a newer form of the same phenomena.
- 1 Examples
- 2 Using the pattern
- 3 Consequences
- 4 Relations
- 4.1 Can Instantiate
- 4.2 Can Modulate
- 4.3 Can Be Instantiated By
- 4.4 Can Be Modulated By
- 4.5 Possible Closure Effects
- 4.6 Potentially Conflicting With
- 5 History
- 6 References
- 7 Acknowledgements
Board Games show many different ways to Capture enemy pieces: Hnefatafl by surrounding a piece from two opposing sides (four for the king), Go by completely enclosing an enemy group of stones, and Chess and Stratego by replacing a piece with ones own. It is also worth noticing that Go allows players to make their own groups be captured for larger tactical reasons while there exists specific rules for which pieces can Capture which pieces in Stratego.
Qix allows the player to catch computer-controlled units by enclosing them in the smaller area of the two areas that are created by outlining a path in the unmarked part of the game area.
Priests in Age of Empires series can convert pieces controlled by other players as their main offensive action.
Using the pattern
Three main decisions need to be done for each type of Capture allowed in games: which game elements can perform the Capture, which game elements can be the targets, and what actions are required to activate the Capture. MacGuffins work well as game elements to Capture when this is the primary focus of the game and they are not destroyed when captured. Otherwise Units are the most common type of game elements used, although Avatars make rare appearance, e.g. through King pieces in Chess (Units will be referred to mostly in the following but unless explicitly noted this could be replaced by MacGuffins or Avatars). Many games, e.g. Chess, Go, and Draughts, make no distinction of which game elements can Capture, but the Bombs in Stratego cannot move and therefore not actively try to Capture other pieces. Likewise, most pieces can be the target of Capture actions but Hnefatafl has special requires for capturing the king piece and Stratego as special rules for which Units can Capture which. Combined with the Imperfect Information in Stratego, this makes capturing there have an element of Risk/Reward.
Parlett describes in some detail 7 ways to Capture in board games: Custodianship, Displacement, Enclosure, Intervention, Leap, Approach, and Withdrawal. Custodianship consist of flanking a target by placing Units in Connection with it. This example of Combos can be found in ordinary Captures in Hnefatafl. Displacement is simply using Movement to enter the space occupied by the target and remove it, as is done for example in Chess. Enclosure, used in Go, requires placing Units in all spaces adjacent to the target or target group (the capture of the king in Hnefatafl can be seen as an example of this as well, or a double case of Custodianship). Intervention is the inverse of Custodianship but Parlett provides no examples. Leap is capturing by moving over the target, as for example is done in Draughts (line leaps allow several target to be capture simultaneously; long leaps do not require that either the starting or stopping space is adjacent to the target). Approach is capturing by moving adjacent to the target while Withdrawal is capturing by moving away from it (Parlett mentions Fanorona as an example of both). More ways are possible (e.g. Reflection and Telekinesis) but have rarely been used.
Even given one of these ways of Capture, the game design must support some action that facilitates it. Turn-Based Games favor the use of Movement, promoting Puzzle Solving and Tactical and through that Stimulated Planning, but can also make use of Investments or Bidding. In the case of Real-Time Games, Movement in the form of Maneuvering is typical as is Aim & Shoot, both promoting skills in Dexterity-Based Actions. Real-Time Games usually has the subgoal of Connection (but Qix shows as an example of using Enclosure) while Turn-Based Games commonly have subgoals such as Alignment, Enclosure, Configuration, or Connection. Those that have Movement as the way to achieve Capture can modulate the difficulty of performing the action by using Privileged Movement.
Parlett also mentions Conversion, which is the Transfer of Control of a game element to another players and which can be used as a modifier to any of the Capture methods listed (Reversi is an example of this), and conflates Capture with Gain Ownership. Another possible modifier is Huffing, allowing Units that could have captured but did not to themselves be captured. Parlett also notes that a Capture can be immediate (the most common case), or be a Delayed Effect that can open up for making it an Interruptible Action (as is argued to exist by those reconstructing the rules of Ludus Latrunculorum).
The action pattern Eliminate is a more specific form of Capture and typically used for Real-Time Games, especially those using Aim & Shoot. It can be used to instantiate Capture but using other means allows less aggressive diegetic explanations of why game elements are removed, and what happens to them after they are removed. Designing Capture can for most cases be seen as choosing between whether to use Eliminate or Gain Ownership, but can in both cases be seen as a struggle over Ownership. Guard goals can easily be added to make Capture goals more difficult, this makes others than those controlling a game element want to protect it and create Excluding Goals.
Capture is a common ways of providing Combat in games, and are also very often related to Overcome goals in the Goal Hierarchies. Since the action is connected to individual game elements, the pattern is often a Ability (but Go can be seen as example of a game with Capture without having it associated with specific game elements). The pattern also typically causes Preventing Goals such as Evade for those controlling the targeted Units. The control of a new game element through Transfer of Control after a Capture can give New Abilities, possibly Privileged Abilities, but can also trigger retaliating Capture goals for the previous owner. How all these related to each other depends primarily on their individual Reward structures and on players' tactics. However, since Units can typically Capture each other, all Units belonging to one players can work against another play and thereby work as Enemies as long as they are Agents.
Capture can modulate Rescue goals by being triggered when those that have Guard goals have fail so that they have a chance of restoring their initial Guard goals. Similarly, Capture makes Maneuvering more important due to the added Penalties possible if mistakes are done.
Capture depends on Timing in Real-Time Games but for Turn-Based Games Puzzle Solving is more often required, as players have to take other Agents actions into consideration due to Turn Taking. Capture combined with Eliminate of game elements that are Non-Renewable Resources can quicken gameplay as fewer game elements remain and promote Higher-Level Closures as Gameplay Progresses since each element represents a greater part of players' Resources. Capture can lead to Challenging Gameplay if one has to try and catch those with Evade goals and these have Privileged Movement; likewise those with Evade goals can have Challenging Gameplay if those with Capture goals have Privileged Movement.
with Bidding, Movement, Investments
with Evade and Privileged Movement
with Real-Time Games
with Transfer of Control
Can Be Instantiated By
Can Be Modulated By
Possible Closure Effects
Potentially Conflicting With
An updated version of the pattern Capture that was part of the original collection in the book Patterns in Game Design.
- Parlett, D. Oxford History of Board Games. Pages 232-233. ISBN-10: 0192129988.
- Björk, S. & Holopainen, J. (2004) Patterns in Game Design. Charles River Media. ISBN1-58450-354-8.
Karl Bergström, Martin Eriksson, Peter Ljungstrand