Difference between revisions of "Endgame"

From gdp3
Jump to: navigation, search
(Relations)
(Relations)
Line 36: Line 36:
  
 
== Relations ==
 
== Relations ==
[[Speedending]]
 
 
[[Possibility of Graceful Surrender]]
 
 
 
=== Can Instantiate ===
 
=== Can Instantiate ===
 
[[Analysis Paralysis]],  
 
[[Analysis Paralysis]],  
Line 59: Line 55:
 
[[Kingmaker]],  
 
[[Kingmaker]],  
 
[[Player Elimination]],  
 
[[Player Elimination]],  
 +
[[Possibility of Graceful Surrender]],
 
[[Predictable Winner]],  
 
[[Predictable Winner]],  
 +
[[Speedending]],
 
[[Winner determined after Gameplay Ends]],  
 
[[Winner determined after Gameplay Ends]],  
 
[[Winning by Ending Gameplay]]
 
[[Winning by Ending Gameplay]]

Revision as of 14:28, 27 July 2015

The one-sentence "definition" that should be in italics.

This pattern is a still a stub.

Examples

Chess and Go are well-known classical Board Games with distinct Endgame phases.

In the Starcraft series the Endgame is typically called "Late-Game"[1].

Anti-Examples

optional

Using the pattern

Diegetic Aspects

Interface Aspects

Narration Aspects

Consequences

Startgame Middlegame

Relations

Can Instantiate

Analysis Paralysis, Higher-Level Closures as Gameplay Progresses, Stimulated Planning, Surrendering

Can Modulate

-

Can Be Instantiated By

Entrenching Gameplay, Exploitation, Extermination

Can Be Modulated By

Construction/Scoring Phase Shift, Early Leaving Players, Kingmaker, Player Elimination, Possibility of Graceful Surrender, Predictable Winner, Speedending, Winner determined after Gameplay Ends, Winning by Ending Gameplay

Possible Closure Effects

-

Potentially Conflicting With

Player Unpredictability, Unwinnable Games

History

New pattern created in this wiki.

References

  1. Entry for "Late-game" at the Wiki for Starcraft II at teamliquid.

Acknowledgements

-