Difference between revisions of "Generic Adversaries"

From gdp3
Jump to: navigation, search
(Using the pattern)
(Examples)
Line 15: Line 15:
  
 
=== Examples ===
 
=== Examples ===
 +
While there are many different types of enemies in [[Super Mario series]], all instances within one category of enemies are identical to each other making all but the boss monsters of these games into [[Generic Adversaries]].
  
==== Anti-Examples ====
+
The regular "infected" that players encounters in the [[Left 4 Dead series]] may look different from each other but are otherwise [[Generic Adversaries]].
optional
+
  
 
== Using the pattern ==
 
== Using the pattern ==

Revision as of 12:13, 31 August 2015

The one-sentence "definition" that should be in italics.

This pattern is a still a stub.

Note: This pattern was first identified in the book chapter "Of Heroes and Henchmen: The Conventions of Killing Generic Expendables in Video Games" by René Glas[1]. TV Tropes uses "Mook" for the same phenomenon[2].

Examples

While there are many different types of enemies in Super Mario series, all instances within one category of enemies are identical to each other making all but the boss monsters of these games into Generic Adversaries.

The regular "infected" that players encounters in the Left 4 Dead series may look different from each other but are otherwise Generic Adversaries.

Using the pattern

Generic Adversaries are diegetically intentional entities that are identical to each other. As such, they can fill roles for Enemies (especially in Waves), Inhabitants, and NPCs that need to exist in large numbers. They are by definition required for the creation of Units. The design involved in creating Generic Adversaries consists of making a template for them and considering when players should encounter them (which might be a question of when they should be spawned).

While Generic Adversaries should be similar enough to be viewed as generic, some variation can be provided to them through Randomness to make gameplay less predictable. One area where this may be especially appropriate is the composition of any eventual Loot they have.

Consequences

As Enemies that can both be numerous and can easily be created on the fly, Generic Adversaries can be well suited to create Combat-oriented Grinding.

If the behavior of Generic Adversaries aren't complex regarding prediction or co-operation, they can open up for Kiting behaviors from players.

Relations

Randomness

Can Instantiate

Enemies, Grinding, Kiting, NPCs, Inhabitants, Units, Waves

Can Modulate

-

Can Be Instantiated By

-

Can Be Modulated By

Loot

Possible Closure Effects

-

Potentially Conflicting With

-

History

A pattern based on the original introduction by Glas[1].

References

  1. 1.0 1.1 Glas, R. (2015). Of Heroes and Henchmen: The Conventions of Killing Generic Expendables in Video Games. In Mortensen, T.E., Linderoth, J. & Brown, A. ML. (2015). The Dark Side of Game Play - Controversial Issues in Playful Environments. Routledge.
  2. Entry for "Mooks" in the TV Tropes wiki.

Acknowledgements

René Glas