Difference between revisions of "Parties"
| Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
=== Examples === | === Examples === | ||
| − | [[Parties]] first emerged in [[:Category:Tabletop Roleplaying Games]] such as [[Dungeons & Dragons]] and the [[Basic Roleplaying System]]. While [[Parties]] simply represented the characters of the players currently playing the structure of the games made it advantageous that characters' had diverse skill sets, e.g. complementing combat-oriented characters with those that could heal or find social solutions to problems. | + | [[Parties]] first emerged in [[:Category:Tabletop Roleplaying Games]] such as [[Dungeons & Dragons]] and the [[Basic Roleplaying System]]. While [[Parties]] simply represented the characters of the players currently playing the structure of the games made it advantageous that characters' had diverse skill sets, e.g. complementing combat-oriented characters with those that could heal or find social solutions to problems. The third edition of [[Warhammer Fantasy Roleplay]] introduced game mechanics specifically oriented to [[Parties]]: the players have to collectively choose which type of party they are with the associated advantages and disadvantages this has. [[GURPS]] provides some possibilities for players to get party-specific advantages (e.g. the "Teamwork" perk). |
| + | Like most other features, [[Parties]] continued to be used in [[:Category:Computer-based Roleplaying Games|Computer-based Roleplaying Games]] such as the [[Ultima series]], the [[Fallout series]], and the [[Dragon Age series]]. In these single-player games the players create [[Parties]] with non-player characters, and may have to choose between which ones to have in the group. In contrast, players of [[World of Warcraft]] need to organize themselves in "raid" groups of appropriate sizes to complete the "instances" provided by the game. In this game concepts such as "tank", "healer", "crowd controller", and "damage dealer" have flourished as players have developed combat strategies. These have in turn influenced the fourth edition of [[Dungeons & Dragons]], which uses functional descriptions such as "leader", "controller", "striker", and "defender". | ||
| − | [[ | + | The [[X-Com series]] shows |
| − | + | == Using the pattern == | |
| + | [[Parties]] usually assume at least three members, so for example [[Torchlight]] - where players always have a pet companion - does not qualify as using the pattern. | ||
| − | + | [[Limited Resources]] | |
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
=== Diegetic Aspects === | === Diegetic Aspects === | ||
| Line 33: | Line 32: | ||
== Consequences == | == Consequences == | ||
| + | |||
| + | Having a maximum number of members in [[Parties]] make them into a form of [[Limited Resources]]. Games such as the [[Fallout series]] and the [[Dragon Age series]] | ||
| + | |||
| + | [[Tradeoffs]] | ||
== Relations == | == Relations == | ||
| + | [[Limited Resources]] | ||
| + | [[Tradeoffs]] | ||
| + | |||
[[Functional Roles]] | [[Functional Roles]] | ||
[[Teams]] | [[Teams]] | ||
| Line 56: | Line 62: | ||
=== Can Instantiate === | === Can Instantiate === | ||
| − | ==== with | + | ==== with [[Limited Resources]] ==== |
| + | [[Tradeoffs]] | ||
=== Can Modulate === | === Can Modulate === | ||
| Line 63: | Line 70: | ||
=== Can Be Modulated By === | === Can Be Modulated By === | ||
| + | [[Limited Resources]] | ||
=== Possible Closure Effects === | === Possible Closure Effects === | ||
Revision as of 13:45, 2 August 2011
...
This pattern is a still a stub.
Contents
Examples
Parties first emerged in Category:Tabletop Roleplaying Games such as Dungeons & Dragons and the Basic Roleplaying System. While Parties simply represented the characters of the players currently playing the structure of the games made it advantageous that characters' had diverse skill sets, e.g. complementing combat-oriented characters with those that could heal or find social solutions to problems. The third edition of Warhammer Fantasy Roleplay introduced game mechanics specifically oriented to Parties: the players have to collectively choose which type of party they are with the associated advantages and disadvantages this has. GURPS provides some possibilities for players to get party-specific advantages (e.g. the "Teamwork" perk).
Like most other features, Parties continued to be used in Computer-based Roleplaying Games such as the Ultima series, the Fallout series, and the Dragon Age series. In these single-player games the players create Parties with non-player characters, and may have to choose between which ones to have in the group. In contrast, players of World of Warcraft need to organize themselves in "raid" groups of appropriate sizes to complete the "instances" provided by the game. In this game concepts such as "tank", "healer", "crowd controller", and "damage dealer" have flourished as players have developed combat strategies. These have in turn influenced the fourth edition of Dungeons & Dragons, which uses functional descriptions such as "leader", "controller", "striker", and "defender".
The X-Com series shows
Using the pattern
Parties usually assume at least three members, so for example Torchlight - where players always have a pet companion - does not qualify as using the pattern.
Diegetic Aspects
Interface Aspects
Narrative Aspects
Consequences
Having a maximum number of members in Parties make them into a form of Limited Resources. Games such as the Fallout series and the Dragon Age series
Relations
Functional Roles Teams Team Combos Togetherness
Characters Companions Player Characters
Player-Decided Distribution of Rewards & Penalties
Can Instantiate
with Limited Resources
Can Modulate
Can Be Instantiated By
Can Be Modulated By
Possible Closure Effects
Potentially Conflicting With
History
New pattern created in this wiki.
References
-
Acknowledgements
-
