Difference between revisions of "Playing to Lose"
(→Consequences) |
|||
| Line 30: | Line 30: | ||
== Consequences == | == Consequences == | ||
| − | [[Playing to lose]] is typically undertaken by players that | + | [[Playing to lose]] is typically undertaken by players that wish to engage in a specific type of [[Storytelling]] through [[Roleplaying]] their [[Characters]] so they have a negative [[Character Development]]. Very often the goal is to have [[Spectacular Failure Enjoyment]]. |
| − | [[ | + | In the Nordic LARP tradition, [[Playing to Lose]] is seen as [[Cooperation]] in [[Storytelling]]<ref name="Nordic"/>. This since players may besides letting their [[Characters]] have a bad fate sacrifice their comfort during play and may miss some of the gameplay to provide a better drama for other players. |
| − | [[ | + | |
| − | [[ | + | |
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | <ref name=" | + | |
| − | + | ||
| − | [[ | + | |
== Relations == | == Relations == | ||
Revision as of 07:07, 16 July 2014
The one-sentence "definition" that should be in italics.
Playing to Lose may not be considered gaming since one is not trying to have a better game state position than other players. However, there are many other ways of viewing this stance towards a game. First, Playing to Lose can be seen as an individual goal that players are try to reach. Second, it can be seen as focusing on storytelling or playing rather than gaming. Lastly, players may actually be competing against other players of who is best at Playing to Lose, something which may not be measured by the game state but even so can be judged by the players.
Note: This pattern does not examine intentionally loosing a game instances for extra-game reasons such as winning bets, having better positions in tournaments, etc. The eight disqualified players in Badminton at the 2012 Summer Olympics are example of the losing in order to manipulate which team they would meet in the next round[1]. For a further example of other ways of playing to lose, see the documentary "Playing to Lose" which examines if the Pittsburgh Penguins Hockey team intentionally lost games during the 1983-84 season to get the first pick of players for the next season.
Contents
Examples
Using the pattern
As explained above, the Playing to Lose does not actually focus on players' success or failure. Instead, it focuses on how Characters lose and can by this be seen as a way players can decide to take Character Development. This requires that Characters have an Open Destiny.
Diegetic Aspects
Interface Aspects
Narrative Aspects
Consequences
Playing to lose is typically undertaken by players that wish to engage in a specific type of Storytelling through Roleplaying their Characters so they have a negative Character Development. Very often the goal is to have Spectacular Failure Enjoyment.
In the Nordic LARP tradition, Playing to Lose is seen as Cooperation in Storytelling[2]. This since players may besides letting their Characters have a bad fate sacrifice their comfort during play and may miss some of the gameplay to provide a better drama for other players.
Relations
Storytelling Roleplaying Character Development Characters Open Destiny Cooperation
Can Instantiate
with ...
Can Modulate
-
Can Be Instantiated By
-
Can Be Modulated By
-
Possible Closure Effects
-
Potentially Conflicting With
-
History
New pattern created in this wiki.
References
- ↑ Entry in Wikipedia for Badminton at the 2012 Summer Olympics – Women's doubles.
- ↑ Entry for Playing to Lose in the Nordic LARP wiki.
Acknowledgements
-
