Difference between revisions of "Ragequitting"
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| + | [[Category:Negative Patterns]] | ||
[[Category:Aesthetic Patterns]] | [[Category:Aesthetic Patterns]] | ||
[[Category:Subjective Patterns]] | [[Category:Subjective Patterns]] | ||
| Line 12: | Line 13: | ||
''Quitting a game instance due to anger or frustration without regards to how this will affect gameplay for others.'' | ''Quitting a game instance due to anger or frustration without regards to how this will affect gameplay for others.'' | ||
| − | + | Playing games are typically a voluntary activity. In most cases players continue playing even when the gameplay is unfavorable, frustrating, or boring for them even so because they do not wish to appear as quitter or because they do not want to ruin the gameplay experience for other players. [[Ragequitting]] is what happens when players do become so frustrated or angry that they stop caring about these things and simply leave a game instance to avoid having to experience it any more. | |
TV Tropes has a entry for "Rage Quit"<ref name="tvtropes"/>. | TV Tropes has a entry for "Rage Quit"<ref name="tvtropes"/>. | ||
| Line 26: | Line 27: | ||
== Using the pattern == | == Using the pattern == | ||
| − | A perceived [[Predictable Winner]] or an identified [[Dominant Strategy]] is typically not enough to provoke [[Ragequitting]] since this might just be due to others playing well. [[Ragequitting]] depends on players feeling frustrated to the point where quitting regardless of consequences for other players gameplay experience becomes the least bad alternative. This is typically happens to players either on due their own performance when meeting [[Challenging Gameplay]] or the inability of succeeding with [[Cooperation]]. The latter cause makes [[Betrayal]] a potential reason for [[Ragequitting]], but only when players are not emotionally prepared for it. [[Pubstomping]] is a typical example of emergent feature that can be frustrating to experience since one is thrown into a disadvantageous gameplay situation with a strong possibility of being killed quickly and then have to experience the exact say thing directly again. | + | [[Ragequitting]] is nearly always seen as a [[:Category:Negative Patterns|Negative Pattern]] and for that reason game designs tend to try and minimize the risk for this to occur or at least mitigate the effect it has on other players. A perceived [[Predictable Winner]] or an identified [[Dominant Strategy]] is typically not enough to provoke [[Ragequitting]] since this might just be due to others playing well. [[Ragequitting]] depends on players feeling frustrated to the point where quitting regardless of consequences for other players gameplay experience becomes the least bad alternative. This is typically happens to players either on due their own performance when meeting [[Challenging Gameplay]] or the inability of succeeding with [[Cooperation]]. The latter cause makes [[Betrayal]] a potential reason for [[Ragequitting]], but only when players are not emotionally prepared for it. [[Pubstomping]] is a typical example of emergent feature that can be frustrating to experience since one is thrown into a disadvantageous gameplay situation with a strong possibility of being killed quickly and then have to experience the exact say thing directly again. |
Designing for [[Spectacular Failure Enjoyment]] is a way to design against [[Ragequitting]] since the two experiences are mutually exclusive. While not directly countering the reasons for [[Ragequitting]], punishing people that do it by negatively adjusting them in [[Ranking Systems]] for this behavior can help players control their behavior. | Designing for [[Spectacular Failure Enjoyment]] is a way to design against [[Ragequitting]] since the two experiences are mutually exclusive. While not directly countering the reasons for [[Ragequitting]], punishing people that do it by negatively adjusting them in [[Ranking Systems]] for this behavior can help players control their behavior. | ||
| Line 38: | Line 39: | ||
[[NPCs]] | [[NPCs]] | ||
[[Possibility of Own Goals]] | [[Possibility of Own Goals]] | ||
| + | [[Drop-In/Drop-Out]] | ||
=== Can Instantiate === | === Can Instantiate === | ||
Revision as of 14:39, 16 January 2015
Quitting a game instance due to anger or frustration without regards to how this will affect gameplay for others.
Playing games are typically a voluntary activity. In most cases players continue playing even when the gameplay is unfavorable, frustrating, or boring for them even so because they do not wish to appear as quitter or because they do not want to ruin the gameplay experience for other players. Ragequitting is what happens when players do become so frustrated or angry that they stop caring about these things and simply leave a game instance to avoid having to experience it any more.
TV Tropes has a entry for "Rage Quit"[1].
Contents
Examples
Online Games such as League of Legends, the Counter-Strike series, the Left 4 Dead series, and the Team Fortress series are well-known for producing Ragequitting since they all require team work under pressure. When teams do not manage to coordinate, agree, or succeed this may become extremely frustrating for players and make them want to quit.
Intrigue and So Long Sucker are games that are noted for causing players to become irritated at each other. This makes them candidates for Ragequitting although this has not been documented or discussed as much as for the games above. There are however several depictions of players Ragequitting games of Go in Japanese art; the covers of the books in the "Get strong at Go" series depict these (see for example "Get Strong at Tesuji"[2]
Sometimes Ragequitting is applied to players that are actually continuing to follow the rules of a game but clearly not trying to win. One such example is the Soccer game between SO l'Emyrne and AS Adema where the former team got so upset with a ruling that they scored a 149 own goals resulting in the other team winning 149 to 0[3].
According to TV Tropes[1], NPCs in Sid Meier's SimGolf can ragequit if their mood value becomes too low.
Using the pattern
Ragequitting is nearly always seen as a Negative Pattern and for that reason game designs tend to try and minimize the risk for this to occur or at least mitigate the effect it has on other players. A perceived Predictable Winner or an identified Dominant Strategy is typically not enough to provoke Ragequitting since this might just be due to others playing well. Ragequitting depends on players feeling frustrated to the point where quitting regardless of consequences for other players gameplay experience becomes the least bad alternative. This is typically happens to players either on due their own performance when meeting Challenging Gameplay or the inability of succeeding with Cooperation. The latter cause makes Betrayal a potential reason for Ragequitting, but only when players are not emotionally prepared for it. Pubstomping is a typical example of emergent feature that can be frustrating to experience since one is thrown into a disadvantageous gameplay situation with a strong possibility of being killed quickly and then have to experience the exact say thing directly again.
Designing for Spectacular Failure Enjoyment is a way to design against Ragequitting since the two experiences are mutually exclusive. While not directly countering the reasons for Ragequitting, punishing people that do it by negatively adjusting them in Ranking Systems for this behavior can help players control their behavior. Togetherness has a dual relationship with Ragequitting. First, people are less likely to ragequit if they are experiencing Togetherness with some of the other players since this typically would negatively affect these other players. Second, if Ragequitting does occur it will break Togetherness related to that player.
Consequences
The direct consequence of Ragequitting is of course that a player Surrenders. Since this was due to anger at what had happened during gameplay, Ragequitting is a good indicator that the quitting player had Emotional Engrossment. Scapegoats are created whenever a person blames other players for the problems that result in Ragequitting.
Relations
Achievements NPCs Possibility of Own Goals Drop-In/Drop-Out
Can Instantiate
Cooperation, Emotional Engrossment, Scapegoats, Surrendering
Can Modulate
-
Can Be Instantiated By
Betrayal, Challenging Gameplay, Pubstomping
Can Be Modulated By
Possible Closure Effects
-
Potentially Conflicting With
Spectacular Failure Enjoyment, Togetherness
History
New pattern created in this wiki.
References
- ↑ 1.0 1.1 Entry for "Rage Quit" on TV Tropes.
- ↑ Amazon's page for the book "Get Strong at Tesuji".
- ↑ Wikipedia Entry for the AS Adema vs. SO l'Emyrne Soccer game in 2002.
Acknowledgements
-
