Difference between revisions of "Safe Havens"

From gdp3
Jump to: navigation, search
Line 21: Line 21:
 
[[Left 4 Dead series]]
 
[[Left 4 Dead series]]
  
 +
[[Team Fortress series]]
  
 
== Using the pattern ==
 
== Using the pattern ==
 +
There are two requirements for a place to be a Safe Haven: first, there should be no environmental elements, such as [[Deadly Traps]], that can negatively affect players. Second, no hostile [[Agents]] or players should be able to affect the area. This can be done by having [[Private Game Spaces]], or, in cases where [[Units]] or [[Avatars]] can perform hostile actions, limiting access by requiring a form of [[Privileged Movement]] to enter.
 +
 
[[Time Limits]]
 
[[Time Limits]]
[[Avatars]]
+
 
[[Private Game Spaces]]
+
 
[[Stimulated Planning]]
 
[[Stimulated Planning]]
 
[[Pottering]]
 
[[Pottering]]
Line 38: Line 40:
  
  
[[Privileged Movement]]
 
  
There are two requirements for a place to be a Safe Haven: first, there should be no environmental elements, such as Deadly Traps, that can negatively affect players. Second, no hostile Agents or players should be able to affect the area. However, the Safe Haven does not have to be permanent, for example it can either be safe under a certain Time Limit or until the players in the Safe Haven perform certain actions. Some Safe Havens also make it impossible for players to have negative consequences of their own actions. These forms of Safe Havens support Experimenting.
+
 
 +
 
 +
However, the Safe Haven does not have to be permanent, for example it can either be safe under a certain Time Limit or until the players in the Safe Haven perform certain actions. Some Safe Havens also make it impossible for players to have negative consequences of their own actions. These forms of Safe Havens support Experimenting.
  
 
One variant to hinder hostile activities within a Safe Haven is to allow hostile Agents or players in the area but make hostile actions impossible within the Safe Haven. Sometimes these kinds of Safe Havens are safe only for the lower ranking players. For example, the home cities in Dark Age of Camelot are safe only for low level characters. By making the Safe Haven a neutral area, players can be offered the possibility for Negotiation and forming Dynamic Alliances.
 
One variant to hinder hostile activities within a Safe Haven is to allow hostile Agents or players in the area but make hostile actions impossible within the Safe Haven. Sometimes these kinds of Safe Havens are safe only for the lower ranking players. For example, the home cities in Dark Age of Camelot are safe only for low level characters. By making the Safe Haven a neutral area, players can be offered the possibility for Negotiation and forming Dynamic Alliances.
Line 63: Line 66:
  
 
=== Can Modulate ===
 
=== Can Modulate ===
 +
[[Agents]]
 +
[[Units]]
 +
[[Avatars]]
  
 
=== Can Be Instantiated By ===
 
=== Can Be Instantiated By ===
 +
[[Privileged Movement]],
 +
[[Private Game Spaces]]
  
 
=== Can Be Modulated By ===
 
=== Can Be Modulated By ===
 +
-
  
 
=== Possible Closure Effects ===
 
=== Possible Closure Effects ===
 +
-
  
 
=== Potentially Conflicting With ===
 
=== Potentially Conflicting With ===
 +
[[Deadly Traps]]
  
 
== History ==
 
== History ==

Revision as of 19:48, 8 March 2011

Locations in game worlds where game elements are safe from harmful game events.

Many games put players' game elements are risk. To allow players rest these risks, games can be design so that some parts of the game environment provide protection from the threats that create these. This makes them into Safe Havens.

Examples

Pieces on castle squares in Pachisi are safe for capture are thereby provide Safe Havens. In addition, a player's home column is effectively a Safe Haven also since no other pieces can enter it (the same applies for the simpler Ludo).

Super Mario 64 has Safe Havens between the worlds since the player is safe from the threats and has time to think what to do next.

Many first-person shooters have Safe Havens, some that are temporary and some that cannot be entered after being left. These Safe Havens are used to avoid the possibility of spawn killing, i. e. the player being killed immediately after having been being brought back into the game.

Minecraft Left 4 Dead series

Team Fortress series

Using the pattern

There are two requirements for a place to be a Safe Haven: first, there should be no environmental elements, such as Deadly Traps, that can negatively affect players. Second, no hostile Agents or players should be able to affect the area. This can be done by having Private Game Spaces, or, in cases where Units or Avatars can perform hostile actions, limiting access by requiring a form of Privileged Movement to enter.

Time Limits

Stimulated Planning Pottering

Risk/Reward

Capture

Tension

Camping



However, the Safe Haven does not have to be permanent, for example it can either be safe under a certain Time Limit or until the players in the Safe Haven perform certain actions. Some Safe Havens also make it impossible for players to have negative consequences of their own actions. These forms of Safe Havens support Experimenting.

One variant to hinder hostile activities within a Safe Haven is to allow hostile Agents or players in the area but make hostile actions impossible within the Safe Haven. Sometimes these kinds of Safe Havens are safe only for the lower ranking players. For example, the home cities in Dark Age of Camelot are safe only for low level characters. By making the Safe Haven a neutral area, players can be offered the possibility for Negotiation and forming Dynamic Alliances.

Safe Havens are often combined with Spawn Points to ensure that the Spawning of Avatars or Units the Game World cannot immediately be followed by attacks by other players. In games with Team Play this allows the teams to at least have a minimal area they always control. Placing Resource Generators inside such Safe Havens will further enhance the Balancing Effect.

One kind of Save Haven can be constructed by making Avatars and Units indestructible for a short period of time after spawning. This approach is typically used in multiplayer games with no teams and games where the Save Haven is publicly accessible to all players.

Diegetic Aspects

Interface Aspects

Narrative Aspects

Consequences

Safe Havens naturally create Goal Points for Traverse goalsand thereby also Strategic Locations. As the players can pause and reconsider their next moves there, this also promotes Stimulated Planning and can be used to lessen Tension or to modulate the gameplay to shift between stressful periods and calmer periods.

Relations

Can Instantiate

with ...

Can Modulate

Agents Units Avatars

Can Be Instantiated By

Privileged Movement, Private Game Spaces

Can Be Modulated By

-

Possible Closure Effects

-

Potentially Conflicting With

Deadly Traps

History

An updated version of the pattern Safe Havens that was part of the original collection in the book Patterns in Game Design[1].

References

  1. Björk, S. & Holopainen, J. (2004) Patterns in Game Design. Charles River Media. ISBN1-58450-354-8.

Acknowledgements

-