Difference between revisions of "Togetherness"

From gdp3
Jump to: navigation, search
(Relations)
(Relations)
Line 38: Line 38:
  
 
== Relations ==
 
== Relations ==
[[Reflective Communication]],
+
=== Can Instantiate ===
[[Real-Time Games]],
+
[[Team Strategy Identification]],
+
[[Spectacular Failure Enjoyment]],
+
[[Multiplayer Games]],
+
[[Parties]],
+
[[Social Rewards]],
+
[[Communication Channels]],
+
[[Negotiable Game Instance Duration]],
+
[[Social Roles]],
+
 
[[Actor Detachment]],  
 
[[Actor Detachment]],  
[[Social Adaptability]],
+
[[Social Roles]]  
 +
 
 +
==== with [[Cooperation]] or [[Negotiation]] ====
 +
[[Reflective Communication]]
 +
 
 +
=== Can Modulate ===
 +
-
 +
 
 +
=== Can Be Instantiated By ===
 
[[Backseat Gamers]],  
 
[[Backseat Gamers]],  
[[Mutual FUBAR Enjoyment]],
+
[[Communication Channels]],  
[[Game Instance Stories]],  
+
 
[[Friend Lists]],  
 
[[Friend Lists]],  
 +
[[Multiplayer Games]],
 +
[[Mutual FUBAR Enjoyment]],
 +
[[Negotiable Game Instance Duration]],
 +
[[Shared Penalties]],
 +
[[Shared Rewards]],
 +
[[Social Adaptability]],
 +
[[Social Rewards]],
 
[[Synchronous Gameplay]],  
 
[[Synchronous Gameplay]],  
[[TvT]],
 
 
[[Team Development]],  
 
[[Team Development]],  
 +
[[Team Strategy Identification]],
 
[[Teams]],  
 
[[Teams]],  
[[Lull Periods]],
+
[[TvT]],  
[[Shared Penalties]],
+
[[Shared Rewards]],  
+
  
=== Can Instantiate ===
+
[[Game Instance Stories]] in [[Multiplayer Games]]
-
+
  
==== with [[Cooperation]] or [[Negotiation]] ====
+
[[Lull Periods]] in [[Multiplayer Games]]
[[Reflective Communication]]
+
  
=== Can Modulate ===
+
[[Parties]] in [[Multiplayer Games]]
-
+
  
=== Can Be Instantiated By ===
+
[[Spectacular Failure Enjoyment]] in [[Multiplayer Games]]
-
+
  
 
=== Can Be Modulated By ===
 
=== Can Be Modulated By ===
-
+
[[Real-Time Games]]
  
 
=== Possible Closure Effects ===
 
=== Possible Closure Effects ===

Revision as of 07:10, 14 April 2022

The one-sentence "definition" that should be in italics.

This pattern is a still a stub.

For a more thorough examination of the concept of Togetherness in the context of gaming, see Bergström 2012[1].

Examples

Anti-Examples

optional

Using the pattern

Collins[2]:

  • Group solidarity, a feeling of membership
  • Emotional energy in the individual: a feeling of confidence, elation, strength, enthusiasm, and initiative in taking action
  • Symbols that represent the group: emblems or other representations (visual icons, words, gestures) that members feel are associated with themselves collectively; these are Durkheim’s “sacred objects”. Persons pumped up with feelings of group solidarity treat symbols with great respect and defend them against the disrespect of outsiders, and even more of renegade insiders.
  • Feelings of morality: the sense of rightness in adhering to the group, respecting its symbols, and defending both against transgressors. Along with this goes the sense of moral evil or impropriety in violating the group’s solidarity and symbolic representations.

Diegetic Aspects

Interface Aspects

Narration Aspects

Consequences

Relations

Can Instantiate

Actor Detachment, Social Roles

with Cooperation or Negotiation

Reflective Communication

Can Modulate

-

Can Be Instantiated By

Backseat Gamers, Communication Channels, Friend Lists, Multiplayer Games, Mutual FUBAR Enjoyment, Negotiable Game Instance Duration, Shared Penalties, Shared Rewards, Social Adaptability, Social Rewards, Synchronous Gameplay, Team Development, Team Strategy Identification, Teams, TvT,

Game Instance Stories in Multiplayer Games

Lull Periods in Multiplayer Games

Parties in Multiplayer Games

Spectacular Failure Enjoyment in Multiplayer Games

Can Be Modulated By

Real-Time Games

Possible Closure Effects

-

Potentially Conflicting With

Drop-In/Drop-Out, Guilting, Player Elimination, Ragequitting, Unsynchronized Game Sessions

History

New pattern created in this wiki.

References

  1. Bergström, K. 2012. Playing for Togetherness - Designing for Interaction Rituals through Gaming. Doctoral thesis in Interaction Design, Gothenburg University.
  2. Collins, R. 2004. Interaction ritual chains, Princeton University Press..

Acknowledgements

Karl Bergström