Difference between revisions of "Parties"

From gdp3
Jump to: navigation, search
Line 38: Line 38:
  
 
== Relations ==
 
== Relations ==
[[Limited Resources]]
 
[[Tradeoffs]]
 
 
[[Functional Roles]]
 
 
[[Teams]]
 
[[Teams]]
 
[[Team Combos]]
 
[[Team Combos]]
Line 55: Line 51:
  
 
[[Internal Rivalry]]
 
[[Internal Rivalry]]
 
[[Loot]]
 
 
[[Player-Decided Distribution of Rewards & Penalties]]
 
  
 
=== Can Instantiate ===
 
=== Can Instantiate ===
 +
[[Functional Roles]],
  
 
==== with [[Limited Resources]] ====
 
==== with [[Limited Resources]] ====
 
[[Tradeoffs]]
 
[[Tradeoffs]]
 +
 +
==== with [[Loot]] ====
 +
[[Player-Decided Distribution of Rewards & Penalties]]
  
 
=== Can Modulate ===
 
=== Can Modulate ===
 +
[[Loot]]
  
 
=== Can Be Instantiated By ===
 
=== Can Be Instantiated By ===

Revision as of 13:47, 2 August 2011

...

This pattern is a still a stub.

Examples

Parties first emerged in Category:Tabletop Roleplaying Games such as Dungeons & Dragons and the Basic Role-Playing system. While Parties simply represented the characters of the players currently playing the structure of the games made it advantageous that characters' had diverse skill sets, e.g. complementing combat-oriented characters with those that could heal or find social solutions to problems. The third edition of Warhammer Fantasy Roleplay introduced game mechanics specifically oriented to Parties: the players have to collectively choose which type of party they are with the associated advantages and disadvantages this has. GURPS provides some possibilities for players to get party-specific advantages (e.g. the "Teamwork" perk).

Like most other features, Parties continued to be used in Computer-based Roleplaying Games such as the Ultima series, the Fallout series, and the Dragon Age series. In these single-player games the players create Parties with non-player characters, and may have to choose between which ones to have in the group. In contrast, players of World of Warcraft need to organize themselves in "raid" groups of appropriate sizes to complete the "instances" provided by the game. In this game concepts such as "tank", "healer", "crowd controller", and "damage dealer" have flourished as players have developed combat strategies. These have in turn influenced the fourth edition of Dungeons & Dragons, which uses functional descriptions such as "leader", "controller", "striker", and "defender".

The X-Com series shows

Using the pattern

Parties usually assume at least three members, so for example Torchlight - where players always have a pet companion - does not qualify as using the pattern.

Limited Resources

Diegetic Aspects

Interface Aspects

Narrative Aspects

Consequences

Having a maximum number of members in Parties make them into a form of Limited Resources. Games such as the Fallout series and the Dragon Age series

Tradeoffs

Relations

Teams Team Combos Togetherness

Characters Companions Player Characters

Inventories

Parallel Lives

Internal Rivalry

Can Instantiate

Functional Roles,

with Limited Resources

Tradeoffs

with Loot

Player-Decided Distribution of Rewards & Penalties

Can Modulate

Loot

Can Be Instantiated By

Can Be Modulated By

Limited Resources

Possible Closure Effects

Potentially Conflicting With

History

New pattern created in this wiki.

References

-

Acknowledgements

-