Difference between revisions of "Mediated Gameplay"

Revision as of 10:58, 27 August 2012

Gameplay where the players interaction with the game state and/or each other is done through a system.

Games are typically designed with the intention of making player experience the gameplay as something they can directly affect. Even so, not all games allow players to directly manipulate or perceive their game state, constructing presentations for players to view and interpreting players' activities to determine with gameplay actions will take place. Games that do this have Mediated Gameplay.

Examples

The game states of Board Games, Card Games, and Pinball Games are typically maintained by the physical game elements used in them. In contrast, computer games such as Asteroids and Pac-Man have Mediated Gameplay in that they an internal game state in the system and construct presentations for players to know what this game state is and what the effects of their actions have been. Making computerized version of Board Games, Card Games, and introduce the same separation between game state, presentation, and possibilities to affect the game state.

Day of the Tentacle and the Elder Scrolls series shows examples of when Mediated Gameplay is used to hide information from the players so they do not have complete access to the entire game state. BatMUD and the Zork series do the same, but also show how text can be used instead of graphics to mediate gameplay.

Mediation of gameplay can also be done by humans. In Tabletop Roleplaying Games such as Call of Cthulhu, Dungeons & Dragons, and Paranoia human game masters maintain (and create) the current game state and the presentation of the game worlds to the players is done through them or under their guidance. I Love Bees, Momentum, and The Beast show examples of where combinations of computer systems and game masters mediate the gameplay for players.

Using the pattern

As the name suggests, Mediated Gameplay need someone or something that mediates the gameplay for the players. While players may make use of existing systems to mediate gameplay, e.g. using email or the postal system to play Chess, this pattern assumes that the mediating system is part of the design of the game. This means that Dedicated Game Facilitators are a prerequisite for the pattern. Given this basis, several more specific patterns can affect various parts of the interaction players have. Cameras allow players to view Game Worlds from perspective not tied to the one's given by Avatars. Communication Channels allows players to talk to each other using non-diegetic communication. More unusual, Self-Reported Positioning allows players themselves to provide their location to the game system in games that make use of this data.

Can Modulate

Potentially Conflicting With

Interruptibility, Social Adaptability,

Imperfect Information, Perfect Information,

Interface Aspects

Mediated Gameplay assumes the presence of an interface that controls at least parts of how players can interact with the game system and each other. For this reason, it is a Interface Pattern. While many other Interface Patterns can be part of Mediated Gameplay they do not necessarily need to be so since the gameplay may primarily be done unmediated with only some presentations being mediated. Patterns which are difficult to support without Mediated Gameplay include Split-Screen Views, Third-Person Views, Tooltips, and Vision Modes. While Self-Reported Positioning also requires Mediated Gameplay it modulates the pattern rather than is created by it.

Narrative Aspects

Since Mediated Gameplay gives the design a possibility to control how players experience the gameplay and Game World, it is a powerful tool in enforcing Narration Structures and providing Surprises.

Consequences

The use of Mediated Gameplay allows games to control information about the gameplay, and presenting the state of the Game World is typically the main responsibility for any game with a diegetic setting.

While the mediation can be used to provide both Imperfect and Perfect Information about the parts of the game state or the entirety of it, Mediated Gameplay also allows for more specific design solutions regarding information presentation, e.g. Split-Screen Views, Third-Person Views, Tooltips, and Vision Modes.

Mediated Gameplay is very likely to have an influence on Multiplayer Games when the communication between the players also become mediated; this typically happens except in the cases when players make sure they have another communication channel (most simply done by sitting close to each other).

The primary effect of this is to make Unmediated Social Interaction impossible, which makes many aspects of Coordination, Cooperation, and Negotiation more difficult; aspects made easier include lying and keeping up appearances.

Enactment,

Asynchronous Games,

Mediated Gameplay can make players have Limited Communication Abilities and when this is consciously enforced, it can lead to Enforced Player Anonymity. Even when players have good possibilities to communicate, the co-presence of Avatars, Handles, or Player Characters can give players the Possibility of Anonymity.

Relations

Can Instantiate

Enforced Player Anonymity, Game Worlds, Imperfect Information, Limited Communication Abilities, Narration Structures, Perfect Information, Split-Screen Views, Surprises, Third-Person Views, Tooltips, Vision Modes

with Avatars, Handles, or Player Characters

Possibility of Anonymity

Can Modulate

Asynchronous Games, Coordination, Cooperation, Enactment, Multiplayer Games, Negotiation

Can Be Instantiated By

Dedicated Game Facilitators, Game Masters

Can Be Modulated By

Cameras, Communication Channels, Self-Reported Positioning

Possible Closure Effects

-

Potentially Conflicting With

Interruptibility, Social Adaptability, Unmediated Social Interaction

History

New pattern created in this wiki.

References

-

Acknowledgements