Difference between revisions of "Emotional Attachment"

Revision as of 20:10, 13 July 2014

The ability of agents to have noticeable emotional relations inside the game world to the diegetic phenomena in that world.

One of the typical assumptions about people is that they have emotional reaction to event that affect them or take place in their immediate surroundings. Players tend to apply these assumptions on people, and other types of agents, in games and can be annoyed or disappointed if these are not met. Making agents in games be able to show Emotional Attachment is a way to counter this by having them react diegetically appropriate.

Note: The pattern related to players being emotionally attached to the game is named Emotional Engrossment.

Examples

Computer-based Roleplaying Games typically can show some Emotional Attachment but not do so consistently. For example, non-player characters in The Elder Scrolls series and the Fallout series get angry and fight back when attacked and sometimes run away when they are frightened, but at the same time they may ignore if players' avatars are jumping on tables and throwing things around.

Using the pattern

Emotional Attachment is a way to provide Agents with ways of showing that they care about what happens in Game Worlds. The nature of designing Emotional Attachment differs greatly based on if the Agents considered are humans or Algorithmic Agents such as AI Players. In the first case the primary task of enabling displays of Emotional Attachment is an interface question (see the subsection below). While the presentation solutions to this is important for Algorithmic Agents to be able to show Emotional Attachment, they also need to have algorithms that ensure that Actions Have Diegetically Social Consequences. Specific examples that may need to be supported by such algorithms include Either You are with Me or against Me and Others Fortune affects own Mood.

Diegetic Aspects

Making Agents follow Diegetic Social Norms and engaging in Diegetic Social Maintenance are two ways of displaying Emotional Attachment. Then again, so can breaking them.

Interface Aspects

While it is Agents that have reactions which show Emotional Attachment, this may need to be expressed diegetically. This typically means supporting players in being able to engage in Enactment and Roleplaying. For games with Mediated Gameplay, equipping Avatars with visual Emotes provides one way of doing this.

Narrative Aspects

While Emotional Attachment helps make Storytelling that does not break Thematic Consistency, Emotional Attachment can also be expressed through Storytelling.

Consequences

As stated above, Emotional Attachment is a way to modulate Agents show they can show emotions so Thematic Consistency can be maintained.

Relations

Can Instantiate

Thematic Consistency

Can Modulate

Agents, AI Players, Storytelling

Can Be Instantiated By

Either You are with Me or against Me, Enactment, Diegetic Social Maintenance, Diegetic Social Norms, Others Fortune affects own Mood, Roleplaying, Storytelling

Actions Have Diegetically Social Consequences together with Algorithmic Agents

Avatars together with Emotes

Can Be Modulated By

-

Possible Closure Effects

-

Potentially Conflicting With

-

History

A rewrite of a pattern that was part of the original collection in the paper Gameplay Design Patterns for Believable Non-Player Characters^[1].

References

1. ↑ Lankoski, P. & Björk, S. (2007) Gameplay Design Patterns for Believable Non-Player Characters. Proceedings of DiGRA 2007.

Acknowledgments