Difference between revisions of "Character Defining Actions"
| Line 19: | Line 19: | ||
For changes in game systems, the actions that define [[Characters]] can either do so gradually through incremental modifications or through distinct choices that significantly changes the [[Characters]]. The former is typically used in relation [[Skills]] and examples of this exists in | For changes in game systems, the actions that define [[Characters]] can either do so gradually through incremental modifications or through distinct choices that significantly changes the [[Characters]]. The former is typically used in relation [[Skills]] and examples of this exists in | ||
| − | [[Basic Roleplaying System]] and the [[Elder Scroll Series]]. Games that have moments that radically change [[Characters]] or make the difference in outcome between [[Character Defining Actions]] great often tie this into [[ | + | [[Basic Roleplaying System]] and the [[Elder Scroll Series]]. Games that have moments that radically change [[Characters]] or make the difference in outcome between [[Character Defining Actions]] great often tie this into [[Narration Structures]]. This can also be achieved through [[Internal Conflicts]] or [[Social Dilemmas]], which may or may not be part of [[Narration Structures]]. An intermittent options may be the choices offered when a new [[Character Levels|Character Level]] is reached. |
It may be difficult to stop players' from building their own perceptions of [[Characters]] in a game based upon what actions they let them perform, but players' can be supported to notice [[Character Defining Actions]] through encouraging [[Roleplaying]] in a game. | It may be difficult to stop players' from building their own perceptions of [[Characters]] in a game based upon what actions they let them perform, but players' can be supported to notice [[Character Defining Actions]] through encouraging [[Roleplaying]] in a game. | ||
| − | The consequences of actions should not easily be possible to undo for them to be seen as defining [[Characters]] since a mutable characteristics is a unsuitable starting point for a stable definition. This means that [[Reversibility]] is difficult to combine with [[Character Defining Actions]] and many of these actions initiate [[Ultra-Powerful Events]], especially when used together with [[ | + | The consequences of actions should not easily be possible to undo for them to be seen as defining [[Characters]] since a mutable characteristics is a unsuitable starting point for a stable definition. This means that [[Reversibility]] is difficult to combine with [[Character Defining Actions]] and many of these actions initiate [[Ultra-Powerful Events]], especially when used together with [[Narration Structures]]. |
| Line 30: | Line 30: | ||
=== Narrative Aspects === | === Narrative Aspects === | ||
| − | Even if [[ | + | Even if [[Narration Structures]] can help set up [[Character Defining Actions]] as noted above, they may also oppose them unless players have an [[Exaggerated Perception of Influence]] or [[Freedom of Choice]]. Especially [[Cut-Scenes]] may be problematic if they are used to develop the [[Characters]] since players have no control over these. |
== Consequences == | == Consequences == | ||
| Line 37: | Line 37: | ||
When [[Character Development]] is used to achieve [[Character Defining Actions]], this supports [[Gain Competence]] goals and [[Planned Character Development]] if players have some form [[Freedom of Choice]] in what way to develop the [[Characters|Character]]. | When [[Character Development]] is used to achieve [[Character Defining Actions]], this supports [[Gain Competence]] goals and [[Planned Character Development]] if players have some form [[Freedom of Choice]] in what way to develop the [[Characters|Character]]. | ||
| − | Given that [[Character Defining Actions]] typically are not combined with [[Reversibility]], these types of actions have an associated [[Risk/Reward]]. Further, since a series of this type of actions describe the development of [[Characters|Character]], they form a [[ | + | Given that [[Character Defining Actions]] typically are not combined with [[Reversibility]], these types of actions have an associated [[Risk/Reward]]. Further, since a series of this type of actions describe the development of [[Characters|Character]], they form a [[Narration Structures|Narration Structure]] even if none was planned beforehand. |
== Relations == | == Relations == | ||
=== Can Instantiate === | === Can Instantiate === | ||
| − | [[Characters]], [[Gain Competence]], [[ | + | [[Characters]], [[Gain Competence]], [[Narration Structures]], [[Planned Character Development]], [[Risk/Reward]], [[Ultra-Powerful Events]] |
=== Can Modulate === | === Can Modulate === | ||
Revision as of 11:52, 30 May 2010
That the choices of actions players make define their characters.
Characters under players' control in games give people the possibility to interact with the game world. Doing so does however also provide a means for those players to define those characters by changing their characteristics, or by filling in blank areas of their personalities or changing these. This can either be on a mechanical level by updates through game state variables or be on a social level on the agreement between players.
Contents
Examples
With the successfully use of a skill or ability in table-top role-playing games such as CORPS and Basic Roleplaying System one gets experience in those skills, and the skill will increase after enough use. A similar system is used in the Elders Scroll Series.
The choices players make in the Fable II changes their alignments, several independent measures including Good-Evil, Slim-Fat, Pure-Corrupt, and Scary-Funny. Besides influencing how NPCs react to the player characters, changes in these alignments also change the appearance of the avatars.
Using the pattern
A primary choice when considering Character Defining Actions is if the gameplay should support defining Characters in the game system or support the social agreement between the players of what constitutes the Characters. It is possible to combine the two but this success of this depends on players' willingness to adjust their perceptions of the Characters to what the game system dictates. Game Masters provide a way of negotiating between the two.
On a system level Character Defining Actions can be implemented by Character Development via Skills where the performed actions determine the areas of competence gain. Improved Abilities and New Abilities can function similarly but may also be consequences of choices in relation to advancements in Character Level, if these are diegetically presented are characters choices, e.g. which teacher to study under. Alternatively, actions can change the relations between the PC and NPCs via Actions Have Diegetically Social Consequences.
For changes in game systems, the actions that define Characters can either do so gradually through incremental modifications or through distinct choices that significantly changes the Characters. The former is typically used in relation Skills and examples of this exists in Basic Roleplaying System and the Elder Scroll Series. Games that have moments that radically change Characters or make the difference in outcome between Character Defining Actions great often tie this into Narration Structures. This can also be achieved through Internal Conflicts or Social Dilemmas, which may or may not be part of Narration Structures. An intermittent options may be the choices offered when a new Character Level is reached.
It may be difficult to stop players' from building their own perceptions of Characters in a game based upon what actions they let them perform, but players' can be supported to notice Character Defining Actions through encouraging Roleplaying in a game.
The consequences of actions should not easily be possible to undo for them to be seen as defining Characters since a mutable characteristics is a unsuitable starting point for a stable definition. This means that Reversibility is difficult to combine with Character Defining Actions and many of these actions initiate Ultra-Powerful Events, especially when used together with Narration Structures.
Diegetic Aspects
As the Fable II example shows, changes in the way players' Characters are presenting is one way of providing feedback on Character Defining Actions.
Narrative Aspects
Even if Narration Structures can help set up Character Defining Actions as noted above, they may also oppose them unless players have an Exaggerated Perception of Influence or Freedom of Choice. Especially Cut-Scenes may be problematic if they are used to develop the Characters since players have no control over these.
Consequences
Character Defining Actions result in the creation of Player-Designed Characters during game sessions. In one sense any use of Characters introduces Character Defining Actions, even if the game system does not provide support for changing statistics of the Characters based on players' actions. This since the actions performed influences how the players interpret the characters. This of course requires that players do some form of interpretation of the Characters, which is not necessarily done in Single-Player Games but can be encouraged through Cut-Scenes or Third-Person Views. This may also be a problem in Multiplayer Games but there representation of other players' Characters offers additional possibilities for this interpretation. Roleplaying can further support this since it strengthens the differentiation between the players and the Characters.
When Character Development is used to achieve Character Defining Actions, this supports Gain Competence goals and Planned Character Development if players have some form Freedom of Choice in what way to develop the Character.
Given that Character Defining Actions typically are not combined with Reversibility, these types of actions have an associated Risk/Reward. Further, since a series of this type of actions describe the development of Character, they form a Narration Structure even if none was planned beforehand.
Relations
Can Instantiate
Characters, Gain Competence, Narration Structures, Planned Character Development, Risk/Reward, Ultra-Powerful Events
Can Modulate
Can Be Instantiated By
Actions Have Diegetically Social Consequences, Character Development, Character Levels, Cut-Scenes, Improved Abilities, Internal Conflicts, Narrative Structures, New Abilities, Roleplaying, Skills, Social Dilemmas, Third-Person Views
Can Be Modulated By
Potentially Conflicting With
Cut-Scenes, Narrative Structures, Reversibility
History
An updated version of the pattern Character Defining Actions, first introduced in Lankoski 2010[1].
References
- ↑ Lankoski (2010). Character-Driven Game Design - A Design Approach and Its Foundations in Character Engagement. PhD thesis at Aalto University. Publication Series of the School of Art and Design A 101.
