Difference between revisions of "Team Balance"
(→Examples) |
|||
| (4 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
[[Category:Dynamic Patterns]] | [[Category:Dynamic Patterns]] | ||
[[Category:Patterns]] | [[Category:Patterns]] | ||
| − | |||
[[Category:Needs revision]] | [[Category:Needs revision]] | ||
[[Category:Needs examples]] | [[Category:Needs examples]] | ||
[[Category:Needs references]] | [[Category:Needs references]] | ||
| − | |||
[[Category:To be Published]] | [[Category:To be Published]] | ||
| − | + | ''The state that competing teams have somewhat equal chances of succeeding with actions in a game or winning a game.'' | |
| − | ''The | + | |
| − | + | Games often categories players or game elements into teams that compete with each other. It is often in everybody's interest to ensure relative [[Team Balance]] between the teams make the gameplay interesting for all players. This can occur both through how the teams are constructed and through game rules that give benefits to teams that have problems and disadvantages to those that are in good positions. | |
=== Examples === | === Examples === | ||
| Line 18: | Line 15: | ||
== Using the pattern == | == Using the pattern == | ||
| − | [[Team Balance]] is used to balance [[Teams]] in games that have [[TvT]] gameplay. Motivations for trying to have the pattern in games range from knowing it is unbalanced due to design specifics to considering the local variations during gameplay can cause imbalances. Then again, a design might have certain patterns already that nearly guarantee that [[Team Balance]] will not be present until supported. The list of such patterns include: [[AI Players]], [[Drop-In/Drop-Out]], [[Empowerment]], [[Invulnerabilities]], [[Late Arriving Players]], [[New Abilities]], [[Player Killing]], [[Player-Decided Results]], [[Positive Feedback Loops]], and [[Privileged Abilities]]. | + | [[Team Balance]] is used to balance [[Teams]] in games that have [[TvT]] gameplay. Motivations for trying to have the pattern in games range from knowing it is unbalanced due to design specifics to considering the local variations during gameplay can cause imbalances. Then again, a design might have certain patterns already that nearly guarantee that [[Team Balance]] will not be present until supported. The list of such patterns include: [[AI Players]], [[Death Consequences]], [[Drop-In/Drop-Out]], [[Empowerment]], [[Invulnerabilities]], [[Late Arriving Players]], [[New Abilities]], [[Player Killing]], [[Player Elimination]], [[Player-Decided Results]], [[Positive Feedback Loops]], and [[Privileged Abilities]]. |
[[Team Balance]] isn't typically created by [[Player Balance]] since the advantages which individual members provide to a [[Teams|Team]] can be offset by disadvantages that member of other members have in the same [[Teams|Team]], advantages that members in other [[Teams]] provide, or external modifications applied to other [[Teams]] to balance out said advantages. | [[Team Balance]] isn't typically created by [[Player Balance]] since the advantages which individual members provide to a [[Teams|Team]] can be offset by disadvantages that member of other members have in the same [[Teams|Team]], advantages that members in other [[Teams]] provide, or external modifications applied to other [[Teams]] to balance out said advantages. | ||
| − | Patterns which can effectively be used to create [[Team Balance]] during or just before gameplay begins include [[Balancing Effects]], [[Dynamic Difficulty Adjustment]], [[Handicap Systems]], and [[Symmetry]]. [[Orthogonal Differentiation]] and [[Team Development]] can be designed to make [[Teams]] balanced, but this is a fragile solution since even small inequalities may work directly against [[Team Balance]] instead; the use of [[Evolving Rule Sets]] can smoothen out problems over time. In games where creating the [[Teams]] are part of the gameplay, [[Drafting]] can also help create [[Team Balance]]. In general, any games which are [[Self-Facilitated Games]] can have [[Team Balance]] if the players agree on changing rules or the game state to make this happen. | + | Patterns which can effectively be used to create [[Team Balance]] during or just before gameplay begins include [[Balancing Effects]], [[Dynamic Difficulty Adjustment]], [[Handicap Systems]], [[Negative Feedback Loops]], |
| + | and [[Symmetry]]. [[Orthogonal Differentiation]] and [[Team Development]] can be designed to make [[Teams]] balanced, but this is a fragile solution since even small inequalities may work directly against [[Team Balance]] instead; the use of [[Evolving Rule Sets]] can smoothen out problems over time. In games where creating the [[Teams]] are part of the gameplay, [[Drafting]] can also help create [[Team Balance]]. In general, any games which are [[Self-Facilitated Games]] can have [[Team Balance]] if the players agree on changing rules or the game state to make this happen. | ||
| + | |||
| + | The possibility of [[Early Leaving Players]] in a game works directly against [[Team Balance]] since as soon as a player leaves it is likely that the [[Team Balance]] is upset. | ||
== Consequences == | == Consequences == | ||
| Line 41: | Line 41: | ||
[[Handicap Systems]], | [[Handicap Systems]], | ||
[[Orthogonal Differentiation]], | [[Orthogonal Differentiation]], | ||
| + | [[Negative Feedback Loops]], | ||
[[Self-Facilitated Games]], | [[Self-Facilitated Games]], | ||
[[Symmetry]], | [[Symmetry]], | ||
| Line 54: | Line 55: | ||
=== Potentially Conflicting With === | === Potentially Conflicting With === | ||
[[AI Players]], | [[AI Players]], | ||
| + | [[Death Consequences]], | ||
[[Drop-In/Drop-Out]], | [[Drop-In/Drop-Out]], | ||
| + | [[Early Leaving Players]], | ||
[[Empowerment]], | [[Empowerment]], | ||
[[Invulnerabilities]], | [[Invulnerabilities]], | ||
| Line 60: | Line 63: | ||
[[New Abilities]], | [[New Abilities]], | ||
[[Orthogonal Differentiation]], | [[Orthogonal Differentiation]], | ||
| + | [[Player Elimination]], | ||
[[Player Killing]], | [[Player Killing]], | ||
[[Player-Decided Results]], | [[Player-Decided Results]], | ||
Latest revision as of 09:46, 4 April 2018
The state that competing teams have somewhat equal chances of succeeding with actions in a game or winning a game.
Games often categories players or game elements into teams that compete with each other. It is often in everybody's interest to ensure relative Team Balance between the teams make the gameplay interesting for all players. This can occur both through how the teams are constructed and through game rules that give benefits to teams that have problems and disadvantages to those that are in good positions.
Contents
Examples
Recreational play of Sports often let team leaders take turns picking members for the team to at least somewhat balance the teams. In professional leagues of American Football, Basketball, and some other Sports the teams that faired worst the previous year gets to begin bidding for players to hire. Drafting is also exists as official options when playing Magic: The Gathering.
Online Games where teams plays against other teams, e.g. Counter-Strike, League of Legends, and the Battlefield series have ranking system that can be used to help balance teams.
Using the pattern
Team Balance is used to balance Teams in games that have TvT gameplay. Motivations for trying to have the pattern in games range from knowing it is unbalanced due to design specifics to considering the local variations during gameplay can cause imbalances. Then again, a design might have certain patterns already that nearly guarantee that Team Balance will not be present until supported. The list of such patterns include: AI Players, Death Consequences, Drop-In/Drop-Out, Empowerment, Invulnerabilities, Late Arriving Players, New Abilities, Player Killing, Player Elimination, Player-Decided Results, Positive Feedback Loops, and Privileged Abilities.
Team Balance isn't typically created by Player Balance since the advantages which individual members provide to a Team can be offset by disadvantages that member of other members have in the same Team, advantages that members in other Teams provide, or external modifications applied to other Teams to balance out said advantages.
Patterns which can effectively be used to create Team Balance during or just before gameplay begins include Balancing Effects, Dynamic Difficulty Adjustment, Handicap Systems, Negative Feedback Loops, and Symmetry. Orthogonal Differentiation and Team Development can be designed to make Teams balanced, but this is a fragile solution since even small inequalities may work directly against Team Balance instead; the use of Evolving Rule Sets can smoothen out problems over time. In games where creating the Teams are part of the gameplay, Drafting can also help create Team Balance. In general, any games which are Self-Facilitated Games can have Team Balance if the players agree on changing rules or the game state to make this happen.
The possibility of Early Leaving Players in a game works directly against Team Balance since as soon as a player leaves it is likely that the Team Balance is upset.
Consequences
The presence of Team Balance gives players a Determinable Chance to Succeed roughly dependent on the number of Teams.
Relations
Can Instantiate
Determinable Chance to Succeed
Can Modulate
Can Be Instantiated By
TvT and either Balancing Effects, Drafting, Evolving Rule Sets, Dynamic Difficulty Adjustment, Handicap Systems, Orthogonal Differentiation, Negative Feedback Loops, Self-Facilitated Games, Symmetry, or Team Development
Can Be Modulated By
-
Possible Closure Effects
-
Potentially Conflicting With
AI Players, Death Consequences, Drop-In/Drop-Out, Early Leaving Players, Empowerment, Invulnerabilities, Late Arriving Players, New Abilities, Orthogonal Differentiation, Player Elimination, Player Killing, Player-Decided Results, Positive Feedback Loops, Privileged Abilities, Team Development
History
An updated version of the pattern Team Balance that was part of the original collection in the book Patterns in Game Design[1].
References
- ↑ Björk, S. & Holopainen, J. (2004) Patterns in Game Design. Charles River Media. ISBN1-58450-354-8.
Acknowledgements
-
