Difference between revisions of "Character Defining Actions"

Revision as of 09:05, 29 October 2010

That the choices of actions players make during gameplay define their characters.

Characters under players' control in games give people the possibility to interact with the game world. Doing so does however also provide a means for those players to define those characters by changing their characteristics, or by filling in blank areas of their personalities or changing these. This can either be on a mechanical level by updates through game state variables or be on a social level on the agreement between players.

Examples

With the successfully use of a skill or ability in table-top role-playing games such as CORPS and Basic Roleplaying System one gets experience in those skills, and the skill will increase after enough use. A similar system is used in the Elders Scroll Series.

The choices players make in the Fable II changes their alignments, several independent measures including Good-Evil, Slim-Fat, Pure-Corrupt, and Scary-Funny. Besides influencing how NPCs react to the player characters, changes in these alignments also change the appearance of the avatars. A main part of the storyline in The Witcher revolves around giving advice to a young boy that possesses magical powers - the choice of which advice one gives effects through the narration not only on the boy but also on the player's character.

Using the pattern

A primary choice when considering Character Defining Actions is if the gameplay should support defining Characters in the game system or support the social agreement between the players of what constitutes the Characters. It is possible to combine the two but this success of this depends on players' willingness to adjust their perceptions of the Characters to what the game system dictates. Game Masters provide a way of negotiating between the two.

On a system level Character Defining Actions can be implemented by Character Development via Skills where the performed actions determine the areas of competence gain. Improved Abilities and New Abilities can function similarly but may also be consequences of choices in relation to advancements in Character Level, if these are diegetically presented are characters choices, e.g. which teacher to study under. Alternatively, actions can change the relations between the PC and NPCs via Actions Have Diegetically Social Consequences.

For changes in game systems, the actions that define Characters can either do so gradually through incremental modifications or through distinct choices that significantly changes the Characters. The former is typically used in relation Skills and examples of this exists in Basic Roleplaying System and the Elder Scroll Series. Games that have moments that radically change Characters or make the difference in outcome between Character Defining Actions great often tie this into Narration Structures. This can also be achieved through Internal Conflicts or Social Dilemmas, which may or may not be part of Narration Structures. An intermittent options may be the choices offered when a new Character Level is reached.

It may be difficult to stop players' from building their own perceptions of Characters in a game based upon what actions they let them perform, but players' can be supported to notice Character Defining Actions through encouraging Roleplaying in a game.

The consequences of actions should not easily be possible to undo for them to be seen as defining Characters since a mutable characteristics is a unsuitable starting point for a stable definition. This means that Reversibility is difficult to combine with Character Defining Actions and many of these actions initiate Ultra-Powerful Events, especially when used together with Narration Structures.

Diegetic Aspects

As the Fable II example shows, changes in the way players' Characters are presenting is one way of providing feedback on Character Defining Actions.

Narrative Aspects

Even if Narration Structures can help set up Character Defining Actions as noted above, they may also oppose them unless players have an Exaggerated Perception of Influence or Freedom of Choice. Especially Cut-Scenes may be problematic when used to develop the Characters in this sense since players have no control over these.

When it is essential that specific Character Defining Actions take place, the use of Enforced Agent Behavior can ensure this.

Consequences

Character Defining Actions result in the creation of Player-Designed Characters during game sessions. In one sense any use of Characters introduces Character Defining Actions, even if the game system does not provide support for changing statistics of the Characters based on players' actions. This since the actions performed influences how the players interpret the characters. This of course requires that players do some form of interpretation of the Characters, which is not necessarily done in Single-Player Games but can be encouraged through Cut-Scenes or Third-Person Views. This may also be a problem in Multiplayer Games but there representation of other players' Characters offers additional possibilities for this interpretation. Roleplaying can further support this since it strengthens the differentiation between the players and the Characters.

When Character Development is used to achieve Character Defining Actions, this supports Gain Competence goals and Player-Planned Character Development if players have some form Freedom of Choice in what way to develop the Character.

Given that Character Defining Actions typically are not combined with Reversibility, these types of actions have an associated Risk/Reward and may require Leaps of Faith if the consequences of the actions have not been presented clearly enough. Further, since a series of this type of actions describe the development of Character, they form a Narration Structure even if none was planned beforehand.

Relations

Can Instantiate

Characters, Gain Competence, Leaps of Faith, Narration Structures, Player-Planned Character Development, Risk/Reward, Ultra-Powerful Events

Can Modulate

Characters

Can Be Instantiated By

Actions Have Diegetically Social Consequences, Character Development, Character Levels, Cut-Scenes, Enforced Agent Behavior, Improved Abilities, Internal Conflicts, Loyalty, Narration Structures, New Abilities, Roleplaying, Skills, Social Dilemmas, Third-Person Views

Can Be Modulated By

Game Masters

Potentially Conflicting With

Cut-Scenes, Narration Structures, Reversibility

History

An updated version of the pattern Character Defining Actions, first introduced in Lankoski 2010^[1].

References

1. ↑ Lankoski (2010). Character-Driven Game Design - A Design Approach and Its Foundations in Character Engagement. D.A. thesis at Aalto University. Publication Series of the School of Art and Design A 101.