Difference between revisions of "Agents"

From gdp3
Jump to: navigation, search
Line 11: Line 11:
  
 
=== Examples ===
 
=== Examples ===
While the ghosts of [[Pac-Man]] and the alien of [[Space Invaders]] can kill the player they do not actively react to what the player does<ref name="Pac-Man"/><ref name="Space Invaders"/>. In this they show little evidence for agency. In contrast, the enemies in later games such as the [[Doom series]], the [[Fallout series]], and the [[Left 4 Dead series]] adjust their actions in response to player actions. This is typically enhanced by them going from passive modes to active modes when first detecting the players.
+
While the ghosts of [[Pac-Man]] and the alien of [[Space Invaders]] can kill the player they do not actively react to what the player does<ref name="Pac-Man"/><ref name="Space Invaders"/>. In this they show little evidence for agency. In contrast, the enemies in later games such as [[Braid]], [[Gauntlet]], the [[Doom series]], the [[Left 4 Dead series]], and the [[Super Mario series]], adjust their actions in response to player actions. This is typically enhanced by them going from passive modes to active modes when first detecting the players.
  
 
Players' characters in roleplaying games such as [[Dungeons & Dragons]] and [[GURPS]] are examples of [[Agents]] since enacting or saying what the characters do is the way they can affect the game world. Likewise, all the non-player characters and monster controlled by game masters are [[Agents]].
 
Players' characters in roleplaying games such as [[Dungeons & Dragons]] and [[GURPS]] are examples of [[Agents]] since enacting or saying what the characters do is the way they can affect the game world. Likewise, all the non-player characters and monster controlled by game masters are [[Agents]].
Line 22: Line 22:
 
[[Avatars]], [[Characters]] and [[Units]] are examples of how [[Agents]] can be created by being directed by humans (or only seem to be so due to actually being [[Mules]] or [[AI Players]]). [[Enemies]], [[NPCs]] and [[Units]] controlled by [[Algorithmic Agents]] or [[Game Masters]] are examples of other common types of [[Agents]].  
 
[[Avatars]], [[Characters]] and [[Units]] are examples of how [[Agents]] can be created by being directed by humans (or only seem to be so due to actually being [[Mules]] or [[AI Players]]). [[Enemies]], [[NPCs]] and [[Units]] controlled by [[Algorithmic Agents]] or [[Game Masters]] are examples of other common types of [[Agents]].  
  
 +
[[Agents]] as a pattern are often volatile, that is players tend to rationalize them to simpler mental constructs if possible (typically [[Converters]], [[Containers]], [[Obstacles]], [[Self-Service Kiosks]] or [[Traps]])<ref name="Lankoski"/>. This in practice means that they are perceived as game elements which move and act with [[Predictable Consequences]] and where one doesn't have to assume they have intentional goals. The use of [[Game Masters]], and for [[Multiplayer Games]] other players, can make it impossible to reduce [[Agents]] behavior to a set of rules since the people controlling them can have an [[Unpredictable Behavior]], at least as long as the [[Game Masters]] and players aren't simply following a set of rules (they may not have an option unless the game has a [[Freedom of Choice]] or [[Randomness]]). For [[Agents]] built on [[Algorithmic Agents]] giving them [[Unpredictable Behavior]] is somewhat of a paradox since they are a set of rules fundamentally but several tricks exists, including [[Ambiguous Responses]], [[Emotional Attachment]], [[Own Agenda]], and [[Randomness]].
  
[[Agents]] as a pattern are often volatile, that is players tend to rationalize them to simpler mental constructs if possible (typically [[Converters]], [[Containers]], [[Obstacles]], [[Self-Service Kiosks]] or [[Traps]])<ref name="Lankoski"/>. This in practice means that they are perceived as game elements which move and act with [[Predictable Consequences]] and where one doesn't have to assume they have intentional goals. The use of [[Game Masters]], and for [[Multiplayer Games]] other players, can make it impossible to reduce [[Agents]] behavior to a set of rules since the people controlling them can have an [[Unpredictable Behavior]], at least as long as the [[Game Masters]] and players aren't simply following a set of rules (they may not have an option unless the game has a [[Freedom of Choice]] or [[Randomness]]). For [[Agents]] built on [[Algorithmic Agents]] giving them [[Unpredictable Behavior]] is somewhat of a paradox since they are a set of rules fundamentally but several tricks exists, including [[Own Agenda]], [[Ambiguous Responses]], and [[Randomness]].
+
In [[Single-Player Games]] it is easy for players to forget to differentiate between their own goals and that of which the [[Focus Loci]] they are controlling. [[Characters]] can be used to provide an explicit statement of the goals of diegetic people and thereby promote [[Roleplaying]] which in turn makes the player act according to the [[Characters]] goals. This is most easily achieved in games where one controls [[Avatars]] (e.g. the [[Fallout series]]), but the makers of the [[Europa Universalis series]] suggest that players can [[Roleplaying]] historical countries.
 
+
[[Roleplaying]]
+
 
+
  
 
[[Enforced Agent Behavior]]
 
[[Enforced Agent Behavior]]
 
[[Focus Loci]]
 
  
 
[[Drop-In/Drop-Out]]
 
[[Drop-In/Drop-Out]]
 
[[Challenging Gameplay]]
 
[[Challenging Gameplay]]
[[Emotional Attachment]]
 
 
[[Stimulated Planning]]
 
[[Stimulated Planning]]
 
[[Fudged Results]]
 
[[Fudged Results]]
Line 48: Line 43:
  
 
== Consequences ==
 
== Consequences ==
 +
[[Agents]] created by having players control them are [[Focus Loci]].
  
 
[[Stimulated Planning]]
 
[[Stimulated Planning]]

Revision as of 12:09, 2 January 2011

Game elements that can be interpreted as having goals.

Games can be viewed as simulations, i.e. an imitation of some aspect of reality. While these may overlook other aspects and include fantastical elements, games often include representations of Agents that actively work towards goals through manipulating the game environment. These Agents may be the points through which player can interact with the game or be the conduits for game facilitators or separated sets of rules to enact other inhabitants in the game world.

Examples

While the ghosts of Pac-Man and the alien of Space Invaders can kill the player they do not actively react to what the player does[1][2]. In this they show little evidence for agency. In contrast, the enemies in later games such as Braid, Gauntlet, the Doom series, the Left 4 Dead series, and the Super Mario series, adjust their actions in response to player actions. This is typically enhanced by them going from passive modes to active modes when first detecting the players.

Players' characters in roleplaying games such as Dungeons & Dragons and GURPS are examples of Agents since enacting or saying what the characters do is the way they can affect the game world. Likewise, all the non-player characters and monster controlled by game masters are Agents.

The computer programs underlying Façade and ELIZA give rise to characters that can be experienced as having personal goals and emotional states, and exploring these is the prime intention of the designs.

Using the pattern

The presence of humans controlling Avatars or Units in games makes it nearly impossible to avoid have Agents in games, and one could argue that unless human-controlled Agents exist in the design it is not a game. The description of Crobots, P-Robots, etc., as games show that others argue that this is not necessary. Adding the Roleplaying pattern (which indeed players themselves can do as a form of Meta Game to most games) is an explicit way of advocating that game elements should be controlled as if they had their own goals - if this is not done the players can be said to not be Roleplaying.

Avatars, Characters and Units are examples of how Agents can be created by being directed by humans (or only seem to be so due to actually being Mules or AI Players). Enemies, NPCs and Units controlled by Algorithmic Agents or Game Masters are examples of other common types of Agents.

Agents as a pattern are often volatile, that is players tend to rationalize them to simpler mental constructs if possible (typically Converters, Containers, Obstacles, Self-Service Kiosks or Traps)[3]. This in practice means that they are perceived as game elements which move and act with Predictable Consequences and where one doesn't have to assume they have intentional goals. The use of Game Masters, and for Multiplayer Games other players, can make it impossible to reduce Agents behavior to a set of rules since the people controlling them can have an Unpredictable Behavior, at least as long as the Game Masters and players aren't simply following a set of rules (they may not have an option unless the game has a Freedom of Choice or Randomness). For Agents built on Algorithmic Agents giving them Unpredictable Behavior is somewhat of a paradox since they are a set of rules fundamentally but several tricks exists, including Ambiguous Responses, Emotional Attachment, Own Agenda, and Randomness.

In Single-Player Games it is easy for players to forget to differentiate between their own goals and that of which the Focus Loci they are controlling. Characters can be used to provide an explicit statement of the goals of diegetic people and thereby promote Roleplaying which in turn makes the player act according to the Characters goals. This is most easily achieved in games where one controls Avatars (e.g. the Fallout series), but the makers of the Europa Universalis series suggest that players can Roleplaying historical countries.

Enforced Agent Behavior

Drop-In/Drop-Out Challenging Gameplay Stimulated Planning Fudged Results Loyalty

Diegetic Aspects

As a first step to making players and Spectators


Interface Aspects

Narrative Aspects

Consequences

Agents created by having players control them are Focus Loci.

Stimulated Planning

Relations

Can Instantiate

Can Modulate

Can Be Instantiated By

Avatars, Humans, Units, Algorithmic Agents

Can Be Modulated By

Possible Closure Effects

Predictable Consequences

Potentially Conflicting With

History

New pattern created in this wiki.

References

  1. Enemies section in the Wikipedia entry for Pac-Man.
  2. Wikipedia entry for Space Invaders.
  3. Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; no text was provided for refs named Lankoski

Cite error: <ref> tag with name "Lankoski2007" defined in <references> is not used in prior text.

Acknowledgments