Difference between revisions of "New Abilities"

Revision as of 18:47, 16 June 2011

The event of gaining new abilities during gameplay that allows for new actions to be performed.

Many games provide players with additional actions that they can perform after they have started playing. These New Abilities often give players more freedom in the games and allow them to be more empowered as gameplay continues.

Examples

Tabletop Roleplaying Games such as Dungeons & Dragons make use of character levels and when players reach new levels, players are awarded with New Abilities. This has been carried over to Computer-based Roleplaying Games such as the Neverwinter Nights and Dragon Age series, and the Fallout series where players get perks at every other character level gained. The Legend of Zelda series does likewise but ties New Abilities more to the possession of new tools.

The FPS Game Return to Castle Wolfenstein: Enemy Territory allows players to gain experience in several different skills during game play. When players "level up" in a skill, they gain New Abilities connected to that skill, e. g., being able to call air strikes based on observation with binoculars, fully reviving team mates with health injections, or having more ammunition in supply packs.

Becoming a zombie in Zombiepox does not automatically mean game over, since players can cure themselves by finding brains. However, when being zombies the players' avatars gain the ability to spread the zombie disease just like other zombies, which does not aid in their long-term success in the game.

Picking up power-ups in the Mario Kart series gives players New Abilities for a certain limit time or limited number of uses.

Using the pattern

Besides what Abilities should be given, the primary design choices for New Abilities lies in if the Abilities are linked to specific Focus Loci or more generally to players, if players can affect what Abilities is gained, and if the Abilities gained are Temporary Abilities due to having Time Limits. Although any Abilities may be New Abilities, Privileged Movement and Quick Returns can be mentioned since they are New Abilities but may be mistaken for Improved Abilities. The difference between New Abilities and Improved Abilities can be defined in several different ways: if the new actions are activated in the same way as the old, if the consequences of the actions affect different parts of the game state, or if the explanation given by the Alternative Realities differentiates them. However, the distinction between them may be blurry for players and it may be prudent to consider both patterns when designing one or the other.

New Abilities given to specific Focus Loci such as Avatars and Characters can be ties to the introduction of specific game elements such as Equipment, Tools, Weapons, new types of Ammunition, and even new Companions. This can be used to make the New Abilities a form of Limited Resources and allow Transfer of Control of the New Abilities through for example Trading or Stealing. Other ways of introducing New Abilities depend more on tying them directly to the game Game Worlds, for example through introducing Controllers or by creating Environmental Effects that are defined by the New Abilities they provide. This localizes the New Abilities to specific points in the Game Worlds and makes players have to move the Avatars or Characters there to get the Abilities. The placement of Chargers and Power-Ups in Game Worlds provide similar options but here getting to particular places (at the right time) becomes important and one then get the New Abilities with a Time Limit. These approaches can be used for Units as well. When done so, they increase the value of individual Units and can create Orthogonal Differentiation, but unless the New Abilities are also Temporary Abilities due to Time Limits, this may make them more into Characters than Units. Games which allows the Capture of enemy Units through Transfer of Control can give players New Abilities through these "converted" Units. Non-localized ways of giving New Abilities are through Character Levels, Evolving Rule Sets, or results of Investments such as advances in Technology Trees, and these options can be applied to Abstract Player Constructs, Characters, or classes of Units. Varying Rule Sets can also do this on a temporary basis.

New Abilities may be preordained by Predetermined Story Structures or forced upon players due to Role Reversal events.

often give players New Abilities while at the same time imposing Ability Losses of existing ones.

Giving players a Freedom of Choice over what New Abilities they gain and letting information about the possible New Abilities be made available in advance allows for Player-Planned Development. In games with Team Play, this also allows Team Development and player-directed Orthogonal Differentiation.

Like Privileged Abilities, New Abilities can affect Player Balance negatively. This may be countered by the Balancing Effects of linking the New Abilities to Ability Losses of another type, forcing players to perform Risk/Reward and Tradeoff choices. Another way to provide Balancing Effects is to have the actions provided by the New Abilities extend a set action that need to be paid for by Budgeted Action Points - so using the New Abilities means not using old ones. Putting Time Limits on how long players have the New Abilities - as is often done with Power-Ups - is a third way of balancing New Abilities.

Can Be Modulated By

Factions, Privileged Abilities,

Having diseases and the ability to spread them is an example of how New Abilities can be Penalties; this can be found in Zombiepox, Team Fortress Classic and caused the Corrupted Blood incident^[1] in World of Warcraft.

Diegetic Aspects

To let other players know what New Abilities players have acquired one can change the representation of Avatars and Units accordingly. Generally, New Abilities fits less well with a game's Thematic Consistency than Improved Abilities unless present through game elements, Abstract Player Construct or Character Development, or part of Predefined Goals,

Interface Aspects

In computer-based games where players have a Freedom of Choice in what New Abilities to get from raises in Character Levels, this is typically done in Secondary Interface Screens.

Narrative Aspects

As stated above, New Abilities may be part of Predetermined Story Structures but can also create narratives through the Character Development they embody, especially when they can be seen as the effects of Character Defining Actions.

Consequences

New Abilities - quite obviously - give players new Abilities in games. They do this through changing what action the players' Focus Loci, e.g. Avatars, Characters, and Units, can do. The ability to have more influence over the game state makes goals of acquiring New Abilities into implicit if not explicit Supporting Goals of Gain Ability, Gain Ownership of Tools, or acquiring new Competence Areas - Power-Ups are examples of game elements that make these goals explicit especially since the New Abilities also typically are Privileged Abilities. As they give players increased Freedom of Choice and the New Abilities may be Privileged Abilities, receiving them is almost always considered a Reward and can give players the feeling of Empowerment. This may give players an Exaggerated Perception of Influence even if no actual influence exist, as in the cases where Red Queen Dilemmas exist due to the New Abilities are matched by New Abilities of Enemies.

Giving New Abilities as the gameplay unfolds can help players have Smooth Learning Curves and provides a means to support Varied Gameplay over a game session. New Abilities given to Characters are a form of Character Development (and if the Abilities are chosen these choices can be seen as Character Defining Actions) and likewise a form of Abstract Player Construct Development when given to Abstract Player Constructs. In games with Teams, New Abilities also creates Team Development and possibly Functional Roles through Competence Areas. This Abstract Player Construct or Character Development can in turn provide the development of Paper-Rock-Scissors and Red Queen Dilemmas structures but also problems with Player Balance in Multiplayer games] (and Team Balance in games with Teams).

New Abilities can provide Balancing Effects when who they are given to and what actions are given is based upon players' current gameplay ranking.

Relations

Can Instantiate

Abstract Player Construct Development, Ammunition, Balancing Effects, Character Defining Actions, Character Development, Competence Areas, Empowerment, Environmental Effects, Exaggerated Perception of Influence, Gain Ability, Orthogonal Differentiation, Privileged Abilities, Red Queen Dilemmas, Rewards, Supporting Goals, Varied Gameplay

with Ability Losses

Risk/Reward, Tradeoff

with Competence Areas and Teams

Functional Roles

with Freedom of Choice

Player-Planned Development

with Power-Ups

Gain Ability, Privileged Abilities

with Teams

Team Development

with Time Limits

Temporary Abilities

with Tools

Gain Ownership

with Units

Characters

Can Modulate

Abilities, Abstract Player Constructs, Avatars, Character Levels, Characters, Focus Loci, Freedom of Choice, Investments, Power-Ups, Predetermined Story Structures, Role Reversal, Technology Trees, Units

with Abstract Player Construct Development or Character Development

Paper-Rock-Scissors,

Can Be Instantiated By

Companions, Controllers, Equipment, Evolving Rule Sets, Gain Ability, Privileged Movement, Quick Returns, Tools, Varying Rule Sets, Weapons

Capture together with Transfer of Control

Can Be Modulated By

Budgeted Action Points, Balancing Effects, Factions, Freedom of Choice, Privileged Abilities, Time Limits, Transfer of Control

Possible Closure Effects

-

Potentially Conflicting With

Player Balance, Team Balance

History

An updated version of the pattern New Abilities that was part of the original collection in the book Patterns in Game Design^[2].

References

1. ↑ Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; no text was provided for refs named Corrupted_Blood
2. ↑ Björk, S. & Holopainen, J. (2004) Patterns in Game Design. Charles River Media. ISBN1-58450-354-8.

Acknowledgements

-