Difference between revisions of "Improved Abilities"
(→Using the pattern) |
|||
Line 38: | Line 38: | ||
The design choices regarding [[Improved Abilities]] include what [[Abilities]] to improve, how much to improve them, when to improve them, and if players have a choice regarding this issues. | The design choices regarding [[Improved Abilities]] include what [[Abilities]] to improve, how much to improve them, when to improve them, and if players have a choice regarding this issues. | ||
− | The difference between [[New Abilities]] and [[Improved Abilities]] is often one of scale or perspective: are the abilities activated in the same fashion as before, do they affect the same parts of the game state, and are do games' [[Alternative Realities]] explain them as being different or the same? [[Improved Abilities]] are often easier to explain within a [[Thematic Consistency]] than [[New Abilities]], as the pattern can be instantiated as increases in [[Attributes]], [[Powers]], or [[Skills]] of [[Characters]] or [[Avatars]]. For [[Abstract Player Constructs]] the introduction of [[Improved Abilities]] can also uses these explanations but [[New Abilities]] are as thematically plausible as improved ones. [[Equipment]], [[Sets]], [[Tools]], [[Vehicles]], and [[Weapons]] are all ways of giving [[Improved Abilities]] that are linked to the possession of [[Game Items]] and therefore fit [[Characters]] and [[Avatars]] well - they can thematically be used on [[Units]] as well but may functionally be effects of [[Investments]], unlocking parts of [[Technology Trees]], or [[Upgrading]]. These latter solutions may also work well on [[Abstract | + | The difference between [[New Abilities]] and [[Improved Abilities]] is often one of scale or perspective: are the abilities activated in the same fashion as before, do they affect the same parts of the game state, and are do games' [[Alternative Realities]] explain them as being different or the same? [[Improved Abilities]] are often easier to explain within a [[Thematic Consistency]] than [[New Abilities]], as the pattern can be instantiated as increases in [[Attributes]], [[Powers]], or [[Skills]] of [[Characters]] or [[Avatars]]. For [[Abstract Player Constructs]] the introduction of [[Improved Abilities]] can also uses these explanations but [[New Abilities]] are as thematically plausible as improved ones. [[Equipment]], [[Sets]], [[Tools]], [[Vehicles]], and [[Weapons]] are all ways of giving [[Improved Abilities]] that are linked to the possession of [[Game Items]] and therefore fit [[Characters]] and [[Avatars]] well - they can thematically be used on [[Units]] as well but may functionally be effects of [[Investments]], unlocking parts of [[Technology Trees]], or [[Upgrading]]. These latter solutions may also work well on [[Abstract Player Constructs]]. |
Revision as of 13:26, 23 June 2011
The event of abilities improving their efficiency.
This pattern is a still a stub.
Improved Abilities are not the physical or mental abilities of players; they are the effects of the game state upon the evaluation functions of actions.
Players can progress in games by having their actions effect on the Game World increase and by having greater chances of succeeding. When these chances or effects have improved, the players have received Improved Abilities and have greater chances of completing goals or otherwise influencing the game state.
Contents
Examples
Example: Tabletop roleplaying games often describe players' skill in an area with a value, and succeeding with the skill requires players to roll below the value with a die. Improvement of these skills is done simply by increasing the associated value.
Example: Chargers and power-ups in racing games often give vehicles a speed boost or raise the maximum speed possible without further affecting players' possible actions.
Fallout series Elder Scroll series
Dungeons & Dragons Basic Role-Playing Hârnmaster Mutant GURPS
Using the pattern
The design choices regarding Improved Abilities include what Abilities to improve, how much to improve them, when to improve them, and if players have a choice regarding this issues.
The difference between New Abilities and Improved Abilities is often one of scale or perspective: are the abilities activated in the same fashion as before, do they affect the same parts of the game state, and are do games' Alternative Realities explain them as being different or the same? Improved Abilities are often easier to explain within a Thematic Consistency than New Abilities, as the pattern can be instantiated as increases in Attributes, Powers, or Skills of Characters or Avatars. For Abstract Player Constructs the introduction of Improved Abilities can also uses these explanations but New Abilities are as thematically plausible as improved ones. Equipment, Sets, Tools, Vehicles, and Weapons are all ways of giving Improved Abilities that are linked to the possession of Game Items and therefore fit Characters and Avatars well - they can thematically be used on Units as well but may functionally be effects of Investments, unlocking parts of Technology Trees, or Upgrading. These latter solutions may also work well on Abstract Player Constructs.
Power-Ups and Chargers are common game elements used to provide temporary Improved Abilities with Time Limits, while Tools give improvements as long as they are carried. Another way to give players Improved Abilities is to make their actions require fewer Resources, thereby letting players make more efficient use of Limited Resources.
As a Balancing Effect, Diminishing Returns can be used to avoid letting players with powerful abilities more easily get Improved Abilities than other players. In the same way, New Abilities can be balanced by Ability Losses in other Competence Areas; game design can have Balancing Effects by linking Decreased Abilities in some areas to Improved Abilities in others.
Budgeted Action Points Movement Combat
Can Instantiate
Can Be Instantiated By
Can Be Modulated By
Can Modulate
Factions, Power-Ups Enemies Freedom of Choice,
Can Modulate
While Improved Abilities may disrupt player balance if given unchecked, Balancing Effects for them can easily be acquired by simultaneously making other Abilities into Decreased Abilities.
Diegetic Aspects
Interface Aspects
Narrative Aspects
Consequences
Improved Abilities give players Empowerment by making the Abilities of Abstract Player Constructs, Avatars, or Characters more potent and can through this promote Competence Areas. The improvement is typically Rewards for completing Gain Competence goals or the acquisition of various types of Controllers, Equipment, Sets, Tools, or Vehicles as part of Gain Ownership goals. Gaining Improved Abilities create Supporting Goals as well, as they empower players to influence the game state and create Exaggerated Perception of Influence. When given before gameplay starts, Improved Abilities are a way of setting Difficulty Levels. Regardless of when they are given, Improved Abilities may go against Challenging Gameplay if given in too much abundance but when given by by others (including Dedicated Game Facilitators or impartial rule systems) they may function as Balancing Effects.
When Improved Abilities are applied to Enemies this can give Challenging Gameplay as well as create Boss Monsters. When applied both to players and Enemies, Improved Abilities can, like New Abilities, give rise to Red Queen Dilemmas. This can also occur when competing players can improve abilities during gameplay so that they are equally matched.
Like New Abilities, the improvement of Abilities is a form of Abstract Player Construct Development or Character Development that may give rise to Varied Gameplay and set up Paper-Rock-Scissors relations (although not as readily as New Abilities may do). When players' are given a Freedom of Choice to affect what Abilities are improved, these effects become more potent and can give rise to Player-Planned Development and the choices can represent Character Defining Actions. In games with Teams, the development also becomes Team Development, potentially with the additional effect of Orthogonal Differentiation.
Improved Abilities can create Tradeoffs when players have to choose between several different categories of Abilities to improve. In the case of Abstract Player Construct Development or Character Development this is typically permanent, but having several different types of Ammunition is one example of how players can have Tradeoffs between different types of Improved Abilities on a moment to moment basis.
Relations
Can Instantiate
Abstract Player Construct Development, Balancing Effects, Character Defining Actions, Character Development, Competence Areas, Difficulty Levels, Empowerment, Environmental Effects, Exaggerated Perception of Influence, Gain Competence, Red Queen Dilemmas, Rewards, Supporting Goals
with Abstract Player Construct Development or Character Development
Paper-Rock-Scissors, Varied Gameplay
Ammunition
with Controllers, Equipment, Sets, Tools, or Vehicles
with Decreased Abilities
with Enemies
with Freedom of Choice
with Teams
Orthogonal Differentiation, Team Development
Can Modulate
Abilities, Abstract Player Constructs, Ammunition, Attributes, Avatars, Challenging Gameplay, Characters, Enemies, Factions, Freedom of Choice, Power-Ups, Powers, Skills, Units
Can Be Instantiated By
Controllers, Equipment, Investments, Sets, Technology Trees, Tools, Upgrading, Vehicles, Weapons
Can Be Modulated By
Possible Closure Effects
-
Potentially Conflicting With
History
An updated version of the pattern Improved Abilities that was part of the original collection in the book Patterns in Game Design[1].
References
- ↑ Björk, S. & Holopainen, J. (2004) Patterns in Game Design. Charles River Media. ISBN1-58450-354-8.