Difference between revisions of "Parties"
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
[[Category:Patterns created on the Wiki]] | [[Category:Patterns created on the Wiki]] | ||
[[Category:Stub]] | [[Category:Stub]] | ||
| − | '' | + | ''Groups of characters working together to '' |
This pattern is a still a stub. | This pattern is a still a stub. | ||
| Line 20: | Line 20: | ||
== Using the pattern == | == Using the pattern == | ||
| + | |||
| + | [[Parties]] can be used in both [[Single-Player games]] and [[Multiplayer Games]]. | ||
| + | |||
[[Parties]] usually assume at least three members, so for example [[Torchlight]] - where players always have a pet companion - does not qualify as using the pattern. | [[Parties]] usually assume at least three members, so for example [[Torchlight]] - where players always have a pet companion - does not qualify as using the pattern. | ||
| Line 46: | Line 49: | ||
== Consequences == | == Consequences == | ||
| + | Although [[Parties]] make use of the [[Characters]] pattern, the pattern can also be said to modulate [[Player Characters]] since it puts them in a group where they need to cooperate. | ||
| + | |||
Having a maximum number of members in [[Parties]] make them into a form of [[Limited Resources]]. Games such as the [[Fallout series]] and the [[Dragon Age series]] use this to force players to make [[Tradeoffs]] between which [[Companions]] to have in their [[Parties]]. | Having a maximum number of members in [[Parties]] make them into a form of [[Limited Resources]]. Games such as the [[Fallout series]] and the [[Dragon Age series]] use this to force players to make [[Tradeoffs]] between which [[Companions]] to have in their [[Parties]]. | ||
| Line 56: | Line 61: | ||
=== Can Instantiate === | === Can Instantiate === | ||
| + | [[Cooperation]] | ||
| + | |||
[[Functional Roles]], | [[Functional Roles]], | ||
[[Internal Rivalry]], | [[Internal Rivalry]], | ||
| Line 69: | Line 76: | ||
== Relations == | == Relations == | ||
=== Can Instantiate === | === Can Instantiate === | ||
| + | [[Cooperation]], | ||
[[Functional Roles]], | [[Functional Roles]], | ||
[[Internal Rivalry]], | [[Internal Rivalry]], | ||
| Line 88: | Line 96: | ||
=== Can Modulate === | === Can Modulate === | ||
[[Loot]] | [[Loot]] | ||
| + | [[Player Characters]] | ||
=== Can Be Instantiated By === | === Can Be Instantiated By === | ||
Revision as of 14:18, 2 August 2011
Groups of characters working together to
This pattern is a still a stub.
Contents
Examples
Parties first emerged in Category:Tabletop Roleplaying Games such as Dungeons & Dragons and the Basic Role-Playing system. While Parties simply represented the characters of the players currently playing the structure of the games made it advantageous that characters' had diverse skill sets, e.g. complementing combat-oriented characters with those that could heal or find social solutions to problems. The third edition of Warhammer Fantasy Roleplay introduced game mechanics specifically oriented to Parties: the players have to collectively choose which type of party they are with the associated advantages and disadvantages this has. GURPS provides some possibilities for players to get party-specific advantages (e.g. the "Teamwork" perk).
Like most other features, Parties continued to be used in Computer-based Roleplaying Games such as the Ultima series, the Fallout series, and the Dragon Age series. In these single-player games the players create Parties with non-player characters, and may have to choose between which ones to have in the group. In contrast, players of World of Warcraft need to organize themselves in "raid" groups of appropriate sizes to complete the "instances" provided by the game. In this game concepts such as "tank", "healer", "crowd controller", and "damage dealer" have flourished as players have developed combat strategies. These have in turn influenced the fourth edition of Dungeons & Dragons, which uses functional descriptions such as "leader", "controller", "striker", and "defender".
The X-COM and UFO series shows examples of small scale strategy games where players create Parties to go into battles against extraterrestrial enemies.
Using the pattern
Parties can be used in both Single-Player games and Multiplayer Games.
Parties usually assume at least three members, so for example Torchlight - where players always have a pet companion - does not qualify as using the pattern.
Characters Companions Player Characters
Can Modulate
Can Be Instantiated By
Can Be Modulated By
Inventories, Limited Resources
Diegetic Aspects
Interface Aspects
Narrative Aspects
Consequences
Although Parties make use of the Characters pattern, the pattern can also be said to modulate Player Characters since it puts them in a group where they need to cooperate.
Having a maximum number of members in Parties make them into a form of Limited Resources. Games such as the Fallout series and the Dragon Age series use this to force players to make Tradeoffs between which Companions to have in their Parties.
with Multiplayer Games
Actions Have Diegetically Social Consequences
Can Be Modulated By
Actions Have Diegetically Social Consequences in games with Companions (add this to Companions as well)
Can Instantiate
Functional Roles, Internal Rivalry, Loyalty, Parallel Lives, Team Combos, Teams, Togetherness
with Loot
Player-Decided Distribution of Rewards & Penalties
Relations
Can Instantiate
Cooperation, Functional Roles, Internal Rivalry, Loyalty, Parallel Lives, Team Combos, Teams, Togetherness
with Limited Resources
with Loot
Player-Decided Distribution of Rewards & Penalties
with Multiplayer Games
Actions Have Diegetically Social Consequences
Can Modulate
Can Be Instantiated By
Can Be Modulated By
Inventories, Limited Resources
Actions Have Diegetically Social Consequences in games with Companions
Possible Closure Effects
-
Potentially Conflicting With
-
History
New pattern created in this wiki.
References
-
Acknowledgements
-
