Difference between revisions of "Awareness of Surroundings"

From gdp3
Jump to: navigation, search
(Consequences)
Line 10: Line 10:
  
 
=== Examples ===
 
=== Examples ===
 
+
[[:Category:First-Person Shooters|FPS]] such as the [[Doom series]] or the [[Counter-Strike series]]
==== Anti-Examples ====
+
optional
+
  
 
== Using the pattern ==
 
== Using the pattern ==
  
=== Can Modulate ===
+
 
 
[[Algorithmic Agents]],  
 
[[Algorithmic Agents]],  
 
[[Non-Player Characters]]
 
[[Non-Player Characters]]
 +
 +
[[Enemies]],
 +
 +
[[Thematic Consistency]]
  
 
=== Diegetic Aspects ===
 
=== Diegetic Aspects ===
Line 37: Line 39:
 
=== Can Modulate ===
 
=== Can Modulate ===
 
[[Algorithmic Agents]],  
 
[[Algorithmic Agents]],  
 +
[[Enemies]],
 
[[Non-Player Characters]]
 
[[Non-Player Characters]]
  

Revision as of 19:52, 12 August 2014

The ability of algorithmic agents to detect and react to all deigetically relevant phenomena.

This pattern is a still a stub.

Examples

FPS such as the Doom series or the Counter-Strike series

Using the pattern

Algorithmic Agents, Non-Player Characters

Enemies,

Thematic Consistency

Diegetic Aspects

Interface Aspects

Narration Aspects

Consequences

That Agents have an Awareness of Surroundings provides one of the requirements for them to display both a Sense of Self and an Own Agenda. This can also help for a game to have Thematic Consistency.

Relations

Can Instantiate

Own Agenda, Sense of Self, Thematic Consistency

Can Modulate

Algorithmic Agents, Enemies, Non-Player Characters

Can Be Instantiated By

-

Can Be Modulated By

-

Possible Closure Effects

-

Potentially Conflicting With

-

History

A rewrite of a pattern that was part of the original collection in the paper Gameplay Design Patterns for Believable Non-Player Characters[1].

References

  1. Lankoski, P. & Björk, S. (2007) Gameplay Design Patterns for Believable Non-Player Characters. Proceedings of DiGRA 2007.

Acknowledgments

-