Difference between revisions of "Excluding Goals"
| Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
This pattern is a still a stub. | This pattern is a still a stub. | ||
| + | |||
| + | Completing an Excluding Goal makes the completion of other goals in the game meaningless or impossible. | ||
| + | Some goals exist in relations to each other so that conditions required in the game state to fulfill one makes the completion of the others impossible. The two basic forms of Excluding Goals are based around collections of the same goal or collections of different goals. Racing is an example of several players having the same goal but only one can complete the goal. Collections of different goals can also be between different players but may also be goals that one player has and has to choose between. | ||
=== Examples === | === Examples === | ||
| + | Example: Races which do not allow tied results use Excluding Goals; the first player to finish the race makes the other players' goals invalid. | ||
| − | + | Example: Star Wars: Knights of the Old Republic is a single player adventure game, where finishing certain goals exclude other possible goals as the player character moves towards being good or evil. | |
| − | + | ||
== Using the pattern == | == Using the pattern == | ||
| + | Excluding Goals can easily be created by taking one goal and constructing Preventing Goals aroundit. However, Excluding Goals do not have to be of a preventing nature, as Races and Overcome goals are examples of goals being excluding but not preventing. However, in these cases Excluding Goals have to use Tie-Breakers to ensure that only one player can have a certain position in the outcome of the game. Further, this requires that there must exist rules to determine the order in which the Excluding Goals exclude each other, typically the order in which they were completed but in some cases judged on how well goals were completed. | ||
| + | |||
| + | Using Excluding Goals with Hierarchy of Goals assumes, of course, that the hierarchy is not linear. Goal hierarchies arranged in a tree-like structure are the most suitable for Excluding Goals as the exclusion can be easily implemented by just cutting of branches from the goal tree. Using the pattern in this manner implies the use of Dynamic Goal Characteristics for the goal information available to the players and also the use of Selectable Sets of Goals to allow the players to choose what goals they are pursuing. | ||
=== Diegetic Aspects === | === Diegetic Aspects === | ||
| Line 28: | Line 34: | ||
== Consequences == | == Consequences == | ||
| + | Excluding Goals is a one way of creating Incompatible Goals; the other goals simply fail when one is completed. Because of this incompatibility, Excluding Goals make Tied Results impossible and raises the level of Conflict between the players. This is because the success of one player becomes closely linked to the failure of the other players in Competition, creating higher Risk/Reward levels compared to goals where players have do not have to compete against each other. Excluding Goals can also create Perceivable Margins if the goals have sufficiently strong impact on the game. | ||
| + | |||
| + | Goal exclusion within Selectable Sets of Goals that is part of a Hierarchy of Goals only allows players to fulfill a subset of the possible goals when playing the game. This use of the pattern can promote Replayability, especially in games with strong Narrative Structure, as it leads to the possibility for players to traverse the hierarchy in different ways, each leading to a different play experience. | ||
| + | |||
| + | The use of Excluding Goals forms a natural starting point for defining Closure Points as certain characteristics of the possible future game states are known when one of the Excluding Goals is completed. If the game state values needed by the excluded goals are not needed for the other goals in the game, the Closure Points may remove game elements no longer needed and make unnecessary action unavailable. | ||
| + | |||
== Relations == | == Relations == | ||
| + | |||
| + | Instantiates: [[Conflict]], [[Competition]], [[Incompatible Goals]], [[Closure Points]] | ||
| + | |||
| + | Modulates: [[Hierarchy of Goals]] | ||
| + | |||
| + | Instantiated by: [[Overcome]], [[Race]], [[Preventing Goals]], [[Tiebreakers]] | ||
| + | |||
| + | Modulated by: [[Selectable Sets of Goals]], [[Dynamic Goal Characteristics]] | ||
| + | |||
| + | Potentially conflicting with: [[Tied Results]], [[Shared Rewards]] | ||
| + | |||
| + | [[Tension]] | ||
| + | [[Gain Competence]] | ||
| + | [[Role Selection]] | ||
| + | [[Races]] | ||
| + | [[Stealth]] | ||
| + | [[Evade]] | ||
=== Can Instantiate === | === Can Instantiate === | ||
Revision as of 08:25, 15 October 2014
The one-sentence "definition" that should be in italics.
This pattern is a still a stub.
Completing an Excluding Goal makes the completion of other goals in the game meaningless or impossible. Some goals exist in relations to each other so that conditions required in the game state to fulfill one makes the completion of the others impossible. The two basic forms of Excluding Goals are based around collections of the same goal or collections of different goals. Racing is an example of several players having the same goal but only one can complete the goal. Collections of different goals can also be between different players but may also be goals that one player has and has to choose between.
Contents
Examples
Example: Races which do not allow tied results use Excluding Goals; the first player to finish the race makes the other players' goals invalid.
Example: Star Wars: Knights of the Old Republic is a single player adventure game, where finishing certain goals exclude other possible goals as the player character moves towards being good or evil.
Using the pattern
Excluding Goals can easily be created by taking one goal and constructing Preventing Goals aroundit. However, Excluding Goals do not have to be of a preventing nature, as Races and Overcome goals are examples of goals being excluding but not preventing. However, in these cases Excluding Goals have to use Tie-Breakers to ensure that only one player can have a certain position in the outcome of the game. Further, this requires that there must exist rules to determine the order in which the Excluding Goals exclude each other, typically the order in which they were completed but in some cases judged on how well goals were completed.
Using Excluding Goals with Hierarchy of Goals assumes, of course, that the hierarchy is not linear. Goal hierarchies arranged in a tree-like structure are the most suitable for Excluding Goals as the exclusion can be easily implemented by just cutting of branches from the goal tree. Using the pattern in this manner implies the use of Dynamic Goal Characteristics for the goal information available to the players and also the use of Selectable Sets of Goals to allow the players to choose what goals they are pursuing.
Diegetic Aspects
Interface Aspects
Narration Aspects
Consequences
Excluding Goals is a one way of creating Incompatible Goals; the other goals simply fail when one is completed. Because of this incompatibility, Excluding Goals make Tied Results impossible and raises the level of Conflict between the players. This is because the success of one player becomes closely linked to the failure of the other players in Competition, creating higher Risk/Reward levels compared to goals where players have do not have to compete against each other. Excluding Goals can also create Perceivable Margins if the goals have sufficiently strong impact on the game.
Goal exclusion within Selectable Sets of Goals that is part of a Hierarchy of Goals only allows players to fulfill a subset of the possible goals when playing the game. This use of the pattern can promote Replayability, especially in games with strong Narrative Structure, as it leads to the possibility for players to traverse the hierarchy in different ways, each leading to a different play experience.
The use of Excluding Goals forms a natural starting point for defining Closure Points as certain characteristics of the possible future game states are known when one of the Excluding Goals is completed. If the game state values needed by the excluded goals are not needed for the other goals in the game, the Closure Points may remove game elements no longer needed and make unnecessary action unavailable.
Relations
Instantiates: Conflict, Competition, Incompatible Goals, Closure Points
Modulates: Hierarchy of Goals
Instantiated by: Overcome, Race, Preventing Goals, Tiebreakers
Modulated by: Selectable Sets of Goals, Dynamic Goal Characteristics
Potentially conflicting with: Tied Results, Shared Rewards
Tension Gain Competence Role Selection Races Stealth Evade
Can Instantiate
-
with ...
Can Modulate
-
Can Be Instantiated By
-
Can Be Modulated By
-
Possible Closure Effects
-
Potentially Conflicting With
-
History
An updated version of the pattern Excluding Goals that was part of the original collection in the book Patterns in Game Design[1].
References
- ↑ Björk, S. & Holopainen, J. (2004) Patterns in Game Design. Charles River Media. ISBN1-58450-354-8.
Acknowledgements
-
