Difference between revisions of "Endgame"
From gdp3
(→Relations) |
(→Relations) |
||
| Line 42: | Line 42: | ||
[[Higher-Level Closures as Gameplay Progresses]] | [[Higher-Level Closures as Gameplay Progresses]] | ||
[[Combat]] | [[Combat]] | ||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
[[Analysis Paralysis]] | [[Analysis Paralysis]] | ||
| Line 56: | Line 53: | ||
=== Can Be Instantiated By === | === Can Be Instantiated By === | ||
| − | + | [[Entrenching Gameplay]], | |
| + | [[Extermination]] | ||
=== Can Be Modulated By === | === Can Be Modulated By === | ||
| − | + | [[Construction/Scoring Phase Shift]] | |
=== Possible Closure Effects === | === Possible Closure Effects === | ||
Revision as of 20:39, 26 July 2015
The one-sentence "definition" that should be in italics.
This pattern is a still a stub.
Contents
Examples
Chess and Go are well-known classical Board Games with distinct Endgame phases.
In the Starcraft series the Endgame is typically called "Late-Game"[1].
Anti-Examples
optional
Using the pattern
Diegetic Aspects
Interface Aspects
Narration Aspects
Consequences
Relations
Player Elimination Kingmaker Early Leaving Players
Higher-Level Closures as Gameplay Progresses Combat Analysis Paralysis
Can Instantiate
-
with ...
Can Modulate
-
Can Be Instantiated By
Entrenching Gameplay, Extermination
Can Be Modulated By
Construction/Scoring Phase Shift
Possible Closure Effects
-
Potentially Conflicting With
-
History
New pattern created in this wiki.
References
Acknowledgements
-
