Difference between revisions of "Supporting Goals"

Revision as of 08:22, 3 October 2016

Goals whose primary effect is to help players achieve other goals of a game.

This pattern is a still a stub.

Examples

Example: In the case of Chess, the subgoals of capturing the opponent's pieces can be seen as Supporting Goals for the higher level goal of checkmating the king. They are not necessary to achieve the checkmate but make it easier to complete.

Example: Getting the power pill in Pac-Man can be seen as a Supporting Goal for the goal of taking all the pills as the ghosts cannot capture Pac-Man during the time he is affected by the power pill.

Example: Real-time strategy games, such as Age of Empires, have many Supporting Goals, from identifying and collecting resources to building defenses and scouting enemy territory, all of which support the goal of defeating the opponents. Much of the skill in those games lies in balancing the struggle towards the different Supporting Goals so that the chances of succeeding with the overarching goal are maximized given the particular circumstances of a specific game instance.

Left 4 Dead series

Using the pattern

The design of Supporting Goals rely on identifying some other goal — the main goal — which can be supported through the Rewards of a Supporting Goal. This can of course exist in several different layers, so what is the main goal for one Supporting Goal can be a Supporting Goal for another (main) goal. The actual challenges of Supporting Goals do not need to be directly related to their main goals, and this may be an desirable to since the reason for the Supporting Goals may be a general difficulty with the type of challenge rather than the difficulty level of the challenge. Another reason why it may be desirable is to provide players with Varied Gameplay.

Goals that commonly work as Supporting Goals include Area Control, Evade, Gain Information, and Sidequests. Other common Supporting Goals are those that provide players with Resources (for example through Pick-Ups) and those that let players have New or Improved Abilities. The general goal class of Races can provide any of these and these goals are therefore often Supporting Goals when they are not the primary goals in a game. The role of Factions in games is often to provide players access to Abilities and Resources and in therefore also typical to provide players with Supporting Goals in the form of goals to join them or goals given by them that give such Abilities or Resources as Rewards. The main point of Gameplay Engines is to make other activities of players easier and constructing Gameplay Engines are for this reason always Supporting Goals. The only caveat to this is if players get overly focused on continuing building on their Gameplay Engines instead of the main goals of the game (this is the challenge in mastering a Construction/Scoring Phase Shift).

Any goals that do help players have more agency in a game, as the ones providing New or Improved Abilities or more Resources, can work as Supporting Goals towards other goals that rely on these Abilities or Resources. This means that often Optional Goals tend to be Supporting Goals as well although in an indirect fashion. Supporting Goals that are not optional instead help create Goal Hierarchies.

Where and when Supporting Goals can be encountered is another important aspect of their design. One option is of course to always have them present while others is to make them only temporary available. For games with Game World Exploration, they may be placed in the Game World at different places to encourage the exploration as well as providing Surprises as part of the exploration. They can similarly be placed in Game Worlds which have Traverse goals to split the goal into several smaller ones or to provide places where Chargers exist; see the Sega Rally series for an example linked to Time Limits and the Mario Kart series and the Super Monkey Ball series for example of speed boosters. In the case of Traverse goals their importance may also be as marking that Check Points have been reached (and these Check Points may in turn be Progress Indicators and Save Points).

Goals based around Red Herrings are the opposite of Supporting Goals since they misled players. The exception is when the Rewards for these goals provide improvements in Abilities or Resources as this may make them indirectly Supporting Goals in the same way other goals with these types of Resources are.

Consequences

Supporting Goals that players need to do to be able and complete the main goals create Goal Hierarchies and function as Progress Indicators towards completing the main goals. Optional ones in contrast make players have to do Trade-Offs between doing the Supporting Goals can going directly for the main goals. This can require Risk/Reward considerations if the Supporting Goals have bad failure consequences or if they can work against the main goals by making players waste Resources or time. In this way Supporting Goals can modify Challenging Gameplay, by letting players either try to take on the main goals directly or make use of Supporting Goals to (potentially) make the main goals easier to complete.

Supporting Goals can sometimes modify Player Balance when they let disadvantaged players have a chance to catch up. This of course depends on the Supporting Goals not being easier for the leading players to complete or win and that the disadvantaged players don't become even more disadvantaged regarding the main area of Competition or Conflict by working towards fulfilling the Supporting Goals.

Non-Player Characters with Supporting Goals to players' goals can create Cooperation and Team Combos. They may also make for more Casual Gameplay. Algorithmic Agents that have Supporting Goals to the goals of players can be Companions to those players. A typical example of this is the Companions players can acquire in the Elder Scrolls or Fallout series.

Relations

Can Instantiate

Goal Hierarchies, Progress Indicators, Varied Gameplay

with Algorithmic Agents

Companions

with Non-Player Characters

Casual Gameplay, Cooperation, Team Combos

Can Modulate

Challenging Gameplay, Game World Exploration, Player Balance, Risk/Reward , Trade-Offs, Traverse

Can Be Instantiated By

Area Control, Chargers, Check Points, Evade, Factions, Gain Information, Gameplay Engines, Improved Abilities, New Abilities, Optional Goals, Pick-Ups, Sidequests, Races

Can Be Modulated By

-

Possible Closure Effects

-

Potentially Conflicting With

Conflicts, Red Herrings

History

An updated version of the pattern Supporting Goals that was part of the original collection in the book Patterns in Game Design^[1].

References

1. ↑ Björk, S. & Holopainen, J. (2004) Patterns in Game Design. Charles River Media. ISBN1-58450-354-8.

Acknowledgements

-