Difference between revisions of "Parallel Lives"
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
[[Category:Needs references]] | [[Category:Needs references]] | ||
[[Category:Stub]] | [[Category:Stub]] | ||
| + | [[Category:Staffan's current workpage]] | ||
''Game elements that when individually lost do not interrupt gameplay, but do so when all are lost.'' | ''Game elements that when individually lost do not interrupt gameplay, but do so when all are lost.'' | ||
| + | |||
| + | The loss of game elements | ||
| + | |||
| + | one of these elements may limit the players' possible actions or opportunities but does not have as severe consequences as the loss of a life of a player character, which typically signifies the end of a game session or forces the players to restart at an earlier point in the game. | ||
This pattern is a still a stub. | This pattern is a still a stub. | ||
| + | |||
=== Examples === | === Examples === | ||
| + | [[Missile Command]] is an archetypical example of [[Parallel Lives]]: the player has six cities that all can be destroyed and the player can continue playing without losing a life as long as at least one city is intact. | ||
| + | |||
| + | [[Lemmings series]] | ||
| + | |||
| + | [[Space Hulk]] is an example of a [[:Category:Board Games|Board Game]] that uses [[Parellel Lives]]. Here the player controlling the space marines at least has a theoretical chance of completing their mission as long as one space marine is still alive. | ||
== Using the pattern == | == Using the pattern == | ||
| + | The design choices associated with Parallel Lives are similar to those of Lives but the Penalties of losing a parallel life is usually small, typically only the loss of the actions the Units provided. However, not all Units need to be valued the same in order to create a hierarchy of importance; the lose of some may allow continued gameplay while others must be kept alive, at least until certain events have taken place,. The consequences of losing all Parallel Lives are typically the same as losing all Lives in an Avatar -based game of Player Elimination but [[Missile Command]] shows multi-layered option - that the [[Parallel Lives]] are not the actually [[Lives]] used in the game and losing all [[Parellel Lives]] only results in losing one of the 'proper' [[Lives]] of the game. | ||
=== Diegetic Aspects === | === Diegetic Aspects === | ||
| Line 20: | Line 32: | ||
== Consequences == | == Consequences == | ||
| + | Parallel Lives require players to make Risk/Reward calculations on which game elements to protect and which to risk. The pattern often requires the players to perform Attention Swapping, especially in games where players do not have a complete overview of the Game World. The use of Parallel Lives is problematic to combine with that of Avatars. | ||
== Relations == | == Relations == | ||
Revision as of 15:59, 21 March 2011
Game elements that when individually lost do not interrupt gameplay, but do so when all are lost.
The loss of game elements
one of these elements may limit the players' possible actions or opportunities but does not have as severe consequences as the loss of a life of a player character, which typically signifies the end of a game session or forces the players to restart at an earlier point in the game.
This pattern is a still a stub.
Examples
Missile Command is an archetypical example of Parallel Lives: the player has six cities that all can be destroyed and the player can continue playing without losing a life as long as at least one city is intact.
Space Hulk is an example of a Board Game that uses Parellel Lives. Here the player controlling the space marines at least has a theoretical chance of completing their mission as long as one space marine is still alive.
Using the pattern
The design choices associated with Parallel Lives are similar to those of Lives but the Penalties of losing a parallel life is usually small, typically only the loss of the actions the Units provided. However, not all Units need to be valued the same in order to create a hierarchy of importance; the lose of some may allow continued gameplay while others must be kept alive, at least until certain events have taken place,. The consequences of losing all Parallel Lives are typically the same as losing all Lives in an Avatar -based game of Player Elimination but Missile Command shows multi-layered option - that the Parallel Lives are not the actually Lives used in the game and losing all Parellel Lives only results in losing one of the 'proper' Lives of the game.
Diegetic Aspects
Interface Aspects
Narrative Aspects
Consequences
Parallel Lives require players to make Risk/Reward calculations on which game elements to protect and which to risk. The pattern often requires the players to perform Attention Swapping, especially in games where players do not have a complete overview of the Game World. The use of Parallel Lives is problematic to combine with that of Avatars.
Relations
Can Instantiate
with ...
Can Modulate
Can Be Instantiated By
Can Be Modulated By
Possible Closure Effects
Potentially Conflicting With
History
An updated version of the pattern Parallel Lives that was part of the original collection in the book Patterns in Game Design[1].
References
- ↑ Björk, S. & Holopainen, J. (2004) Patterns in Game Design. Charles River Media. ISBN1-58450-354-8.
