Difference between revisions of "Parallel Lives"
| Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
== Using the pattern == | == Using the pattern == | ||
| − | + | [[Parallel Lives]] can be seen as a form of [[Lives]], and the design choices associated with [[Parallel Lives]] are similar to those of [[Lives]] with the addition that one needs to decide what game elements represent the individual 'lives'. [[Units]] are a natural option since they are designed to exist in numbers and can typically be lost. [[Missile Command]] shows how the available [[Destructables]] (in this specific case cities) can be the [[Parallel Lives]]. Games that use [[Avatars]] in ways close to that of [[Units]], e.g. [[Sleepwalker]] and [[Mario & Luigi: Partners in Time]], show that these can also be used in some circumstances. | |
The [[Penalties]] of losing a parallel 'life' is usually small comparably to that of [[Lives]], typically only the loss of the actions the Units provided. However, not all Units need to be valued the same in order to create a hierarchy of importance; the lose of some may allow continued gameplay while others must be kept alive, at least until certain events have taken place,. The consequences of losing all [[Parallel Lives]] are typically the same as losing all [[Lives]] in an [[Avatar]]-based game of [[Player Elimination]] but [[Missile Command]] shows multi-layered option - that the [[Parallel Lives]] are not the actually [[Lives]] used in the game and losing all [[Parallel Lives]] only results in losing one of the 'proper' [[Lives]] of the game. | The [[Penalties]] of losing a parallel 'life' is usually small comparably to that of [[Lives]], typically only the loss of the actions the Units provided. However, not all Units need to be valued the same in order to create a hierarchy of importance; the lose of some may allow continued gameplay while others must be kept alive, at least until certain events have taken place,. The consequences of losing all [[Parallel Lives]] are typically the same as losing all [[Lives]] in an [[Avatar]]-based game of [[Player Elimination]] but [[Missile Command]] shows multi-layered option - that the [[Parallel Lives]] are not the actually [[Lives]] used in the game and losing all [[Parallel Lives]] only results in losing one of the 'proper' [[Lives]] of the game. | ||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
== Consequences == | == Consequences == | ||
| Line 33: | Line 25: | ||
=== Can Modulate === | === Can Modulate === | ||
| − | + | [[Lives]] | |
=== Can Be Instantiated By === | === Can Be Instantiated By === | ||
Revision as of 16:32, 21 March 2011
Game elements that when individually lost do not interrupt gameplay, but do so when all or a predefined amount of them are lost.
The loss of game elements is bad for players for many games. While in some games a player only has one game element and loses the game if this is lost, or as in Chess one has many but one is of vital importance, other games let players control many that are at risk at once and gameplay continue without too much disturbance at long as some of them still remain. Since each of these can be said to be one of the players' 'lives' and they are all at risk in parallel, these can be called Parallel Lives.
Contents
Examples
Missile Command is an archetypical example of Parallel Lives: the player has six cities that all can be destroyed and the player can continue playing without losing a life as long as at least one city is intact. The Lemmings series give players the goal to make a certain number of 'lemmings' make it from one point of a level to another. Which make it is not important as long as a sufficient number do.
Space Hulk is an example of a Board Game that uses Parallel Lives. Here the player controlling the space marines at least has a theoretical chance of completing their mission as long as one space marine is still alive.
Using the pattern
Parallel Lives can be seen as a form of Lives, and the design choices associated with Parallel Lives are similar to those of Lives with the addition that one needs to decide what game elements represent the individual 'lives'. Units are a natural option since they are designed to exist in numbers and can typically be lost. Missile Command shows how the available Destructables (in this specific case cities) can be the Parallel Lives. Games that use Avatars in ways close to that of Units, e.g. Sleepwalker and Mario & Luigi: Partners in Time, show that these can also be used in some circumstances.
The Penalties of losing a parallel 'life' is usually small comparably to that of Lives, typically only the loss of the actions the Units provided. However, not all Units need to be valued the same in order to create a hierarchy of importance; the lose of some may allow continued gameplay while others must be kept alive, at least until certain events have taken place,. The consequences of losing all Parallel Lives are typically the same as losing all Lives in an Avatar-based game of Player Elimination but Missile Command shows multi-layered option - that the Parallel Lives are not the actually Lives used in the game and losing all Parallel Lives only results in losing one of the 'proper' Lives of the game.
Consequences
Parallel Lives require players to make Risk/Reward calculations on which game elements to protect and which to risk. The pattern often requires the players to perform Attention Swapping, especially in games where players do not have a complete overview of the Game World. The use of Parallel Lives is problematic to combine with that of Avatars.
Relations
Can Instantiate
-
Can Modulate
Can Be Instantiated By
Can Be Modulated By
Possible Closure Effects
Potentially Conflicting With
-
History
An updated version of the pattern Parallel Lives that was part of the original collection in the book Patterns in Game Design[1].
References
- ↑ Björk, S. & Holopainen, J. (2004) Patterns in Game Design. Charles River Media. ISBN1-58450-354-8.
