Difference between revisions of "Player Killing"
| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
This pattern is a still a stub. | This pattern is a still a stub. | ||
| + | |||
| + | Games in which the players control only one Avatar each make the death of these very influential for players' experiences and success in the game. As players easily identify with their Avatars, killing them is usually referred to as Player Killing even though it is actually Avatar killing. | ||
=== Examples === | === Examples === | ||
| + | Early Ultima Online was notorious for more experienced players killing other players' characters for looting their items or just for fun. The players who were killed lost the items they were carrying unless they were able to come back to the spot before the player killers looted them. | ||
| + | |||
| + | Deathmatch first-person shooters, such as Quake III, have Player Killing as one of the main goals for the game. The more other players the player manages to take out, the more points or frags he is rewarded. The players who are killed usually lose their gained special items and abilities and are transferred back to a spawn point. | ||
| + | |||
| + | Counter-Strike | ||
| + | |||
| + | Frag | ||
| + | |||
== Using the pattern == | == Using the pattern == | ||
| + | Having or not having Player Killing is always an explicit design choice. Player Killing is, in effect, Player Elimination with the Spawning of the players' Avatars allowed. Designing Player Killing in the game obviously involves deciding the details of Spawning and Penalties involved for being killed. Usually they are mainly Individual Penalties even in games with Team Play, and players receive Decreased Abilities, Ability Losses, and they might lose Ownership of Tools and other items they possess at the time of killing. Other possibilities include forced Downtime or limitations to the number of times a player can respawn due to the use of Lives. | ||
| + | |||
| + | Player Killing can be used as a method of keeping Score in both games with Team Play, as in games with Team Elimination, and without Team Play. Games with Team Play sometimes allow the players to Eliminate their team members, and this can be called unintentional Player Killing. On the other hand, some team-oriented games break Consistent Reality Logic by not having the possibility of Player Killing within the same team in order to avoid internal fighting and possibilities for saboteurs. | ||
=== Diegetic Aspects === | === Diegetic Aspects === | ||
| Line 22: | Line 35: | ||
== Consequences == | == Consequences == | ||
| + | Player Killing naturally has an effect on Tension involved, depending on the actual Penalties and Rewards for Player Killing. The Tension involved is usually not as drastic as in games with Player Elimination without Spawning but is modulated in both cases by how much Identification the player has with the controlled Avatar. As the early versions of Ultima Online demonstrated, if the players are rewarded for Player Killing, that is what is going to happen no matter what the social rules of conduct are within the game itself. More recent MMORPGs have solved the Player Killing problem either by removing the possibility of Player Killing, having special places in the Game World where Player Killing is allowed, or designing Penalties also for player killers, for example, by changing their explicit Social Status to outlaws and not allowing them to enter cities. Depending on the solution, Player Killing can significantly modify Risk/Reward choices for both attackers and potential victims. | ||
== Relations == | == Relations == | ||
| + | [[Ability Losses]] | ||
| + | [[Permadeath]] | ||
| + | [[Lives]] | ||
| + | [[Downtime]] | ||
=== Can Instantiate === | === Can Instantiate === | ||
Revision as of 07:39, 6 July 2011
The intentionally, or unintentionally, removal of players from active gameplay.
This pattern is a still a stub.
Games in which the players control only one Avatar each make the death of these very influential for players' experiences and success in the game. As players easily identify with their Avatars, killing them is usually referred to as Player Killing even though it is actually Avatar killing.
Contents
Examples
Early Ultima Online was notorious for more experienced players killing other players' characters for looting their items or just for fun. The players who were killed lost the items they were carrying unless they were able to come back to the spot before the player killers looted them.
Deathmatch first-person shooters, such as Quake III, have Player Killing as one of the main goals for the game. The more other players the player manages to take out, the more points or frags he is rewarded. The players who are killed usually lose their gained special items and abilities and are transferred back to a spawn point.
Counter-Strike
Frag
Using the pattern
Having or not having Player Killing is always an explicit design choice. Player Killing is, in effect, Player Elimination with the Spawning of the players' Avatars allowed. Designing Player Killing in the game obviously involves deciding the details of Spawning and Penalties involved for being killed. Usually they are mainly Individual Penalties even in games with Team Play, and players receive Decreased Abilities, Ability Losses, and they might lose Ownership of Tools and other items they possess at the time of killing. Other possibilities include forced Downtime or limitations to the number of times a player can respawn due to the use of Lives.
Player Killing can be used as a method of keeping Score in both games with Team Play, as in games with Team Elimination, and without Team Play. Games with Team Play sometimes allow the players to Eliminate their team members, and this can be called unintentional Player Killing. On the other hand, some team-oriented games break Consistent Reality Logic by not having the possibility of Player Killing within the same team in order to avoid internal fighting and possibilities for saboteurs.
Diegetic Aspects
Interface Aspects
Narrative Aspects
Consequences
Player Killing naturally has an effect on Tension involved, depending on the actual Penalties and Rewards for Player Killing. The Tension involved is usually not as drastic as in games with Player Elimination without Spawning but is modulated in both cases by how much Identification the player has with the controlled Avatar. As the early versions of Ultima Online demonstrated, if the players are rewarded for Player Killing, that is what is going to happen no matter what the social rules of conduct are within the game itself. More recent MMORPGs have solved the Player Killing problem either by removing the possibility of Player Killing, having special places in the Game World where Player Killing is allowed, or designing Penalties also for player killers, for example, by changing their explicit Social Status to outlaws and not allowing them to enter cities. Depending on the solution, Player Killing can significantly modify Risk/Reward choices for both attackers and potential victims.
Relations
Ability Losses Permadeath Lives Downtime
Can Instantiate
with ...
Can Modulate
Can Be Instantiated By
Can Be Modulated By
Possible Closure Effects
Potentially Conflicting With
History
An updated version of the pattern Player Killing that was part of the original collection in the book Patterns in Game Design[1].
References
- ↑ Björk, S. & Holopainen, J. (2004) Patterns in Game Design. Charles River Media. ISBN1-58450-354-8.
Acknowledgements
-
