Difference between revisions of "Area Control"
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
''Being in control over who can move within an area in the game world, or having access to actions linked to locations in the game world.'' | ''Being in control over who can move within an area in the game world, or having access to actions linked to locations in the game world.'' | ||
| − | + | Games with game worlds of some kind often make use of these worlds by making different parts of them have different value for gameplay. This makes it natural for players to try and have access and control to these. This [[Area Control]] may hinder other players from using the resources or other possibilities available there, or can simply be that one can oneself access them regardless if other players can do so also. | |
| − | + | ||
| − | Games with | + | |
=== Examples === | === Examples === | ||
| + | the goal of Go is to have as efficient Area Control as possible through so few stones as possible. Gameplay typically begins with claiming areas in the corners, which are most easy to defend, and then moving out along the sides to finally revolve around the center of the board. | ||
| − | + | having implicit Area Control over the center of the game board in Chess is one of the main strategies in the game. | |
| − | + | [[Area Control]] can also be regulated through rules. For example, one of the goals in the [[Battlefield series]] is to have control over flag points. This is done by teams by having sole presences in the areas around the flags for a certain period of time. Other games, e.g. [[Risk]] and [[Greed Corp]] give players [[Area Control]] simply by entering locations (and [[Greed Corp]] lets this persist when units are moved out of the | |
| − | |||
== Using the pattern == | == Using the pattern == | ||
Revision as of 13:51, 14 July 2011
Being in control over who can move within an area in the game world, or having access to actions linked to locations in the game world.
Games with game worlds of some kind often make use of these worlds by making different parts of them have different value for gameplay. This makes it natural for players to try and have access and control to these. This Area Control may hinder other players from using the resources or other possibilities available there, or can simply be that one can oneself access them regardless if other players can do so also.
Contents
Examples
the goal of Go is to have as efficient Area Control as possible through so few stones as possible. Gameplay typically begins with claiming areas in the corners, which are most easy to defend, and then moving out along the sides to finally revolve around the center of the board.
having implicit Area Control over the center of the game board in Chess is one of the main strategies in the game.
Area Control can also be regulated through rules. For example, one of the goals in the Battlefield series is to have control over flag points. This is done by teams by having sole presences in the areas around the flags for a certain period of time. Other games, e.g. Risk and Greed Corp give players Area Control simply by entering locations (and Greed Corp lets this persist when units are moved out of the
Using the pattern
The design of Area Control consists of how control is achieved and what effects the control gives. Control can either be due to direct or indirect actions. Direct actions consist of reach the area itself with a Focus Loci, making it a Race to Traverse to the area. Often Contact with the area determines the winner, but the Contact may have to be an Extended Action to give Perceivable Margins and let other players try to Overcome the first claimer. Gaining Area Control due to indirect actions does not require players to have Focus Loci in the area but instead requires the use of Resources in Trading or Bidding, alternatively being given the area as an effect of Luck.
If the ownership of the area is not an Irreversible Action, the possibility of future Transfer of Controls creates Guard goals of keeping the area which are both Continuous Goals and Interferable Goals. Preventing Goals of Overcome or Eliminate can created around the Guard goal, as can Stealth when an extended sole presence is required to control the area. If the game area is larger than can be overviewed at once, the subgoal of Reconnaissance may be necessary. The Guard goal can be encouraged by giving explicit Penalties beyond any possible losses of abilities and Resources that naturally occur when the area is lost. This makes the goal of keeping the area a Committed Goal.
The common effects of Area Control is access to Producers and Resources in the area, Privileged Abilities from Controllers, providing good Game State Overview through the view from the area, or making opponents have Movement Limitations. When being in the area making completion of other goals easier, for example having positive modifiers for Combat, the action of having Area Control is a Supporting Goal.
Can Be Instantiated By
Can Be Modulated By
Controllers, Extended Actions, Strategic Knowledge, Territories
Interface Aspects
Area Control is typically not shown in game interfaces unless it is formalized with Territories.
Consequences
Having Area Control is a form of Ownership that affects Game Worlds. Getting Area Control over part of a Game World can be the fulfillment to Gain Ownership goals defined by Goal Points, and make the areas into Strategic Locations. Besides the Rewards of completing the goal, areas may be Strategic Locations due to the Game State Overview the areas gives or the presence of Producers, Controllers or Resources. Like other cases of ownership, having Area Control can give Emotional Immersion and modulates how players perceive potential losses of areas.
When many areas exist that can be controlled, knowing the values of each is Strategic Knowledge. Choosing between these Selectable Sets of Goals may require players to do Risk/Reward choices or Tradeoffs as not all areas may be able to be controlled by one player. Maintaining control over several areas requires Attention Swapping or Team Play.
Can Instantiate
with Location-Fixed Abilities
Privileged Abilities, Temporary Abilities
with Territories
Can Modulate
Relations
Can Instantiate
Movement Limitations, Ownership
with Location-Fixed Abilities
Privileged Abilities, Temporary Abilities
with Territories
Can Modulate
Game Worlds, Location-Fixed Abilities
Can Be Instantiated By
Can Be Modulated By
Controllers, Extended Actions, Strategic Knowledge, Territories
Possible Closure Effects
-
Potentially Conflicting With
-
History
An updated version of the pattern Area Control that was part of the original collection in the book Patterns in Game Design[1].
References
- ↑ Björk, S. & Holopainen, J. (2004) Patterns in Game Design. Charles River Media. ISBN1-58450-354-8.
Acknowledgements
-
