Difference between revisions of "Real Life Activities Affect Game State"
(→History) |
(→Relations) |
||
Line 38: | Line 38: | ||
== Relations == | == Relations == | ||
+ | [[Real World Knowledge Advantages]] | ||
+ | |||
=== Can Instantiate === | === Can Instantiate === | ||
[[Changes in Perception of Real World Phenomena due to Gameplay]], | [[Changes in Perception of Real World Phenomena due to Gameplay]], |
Revision as of 07:52, 23 August 2012
The one-sentence "definition" that should be in italics.
This pattern is a still a stub.
Contents
Examples
The energy usage in a household is the primary input to the game Power Explorer, indirectly causing the players' everyday behavior affect the game through how much electrical energy their activities use.
Zombie Run
Anti-Examples
rock band
wii games
Using the pattern
Player-Location Proximity does not directly make Real Life Activities Affect Game State part of the gameplay of a game, but
Diegetic Aspects
Interface Aspects
Narrative Aspects
Consequences
Relations
Real World Knowledge Advantages
Can Instantiate
Changes in Perception of Real World Phenomena due to Gameplay, Extra-Game Input, Pervasive Gameplay, Ubiquitous Gameplay
Can Modulate
-
Can Be Instantiated By
Physical Navigation, Player Physical Prowess
Extra-Game Input together with Pervasive Gameplay
Can Be Modulated By
-
Possible Closure Effects
-
Potentially Conflicting With
History
Updated version of the pattern Real Life Activities Affect Game State first described in the report Game Design Patterns for Mobile Games[1].
References
- ↑ Davidsson, O., Peitz, J. & Björk, S. (2004). Game Design Patterns for Mobile Games. Project report to Nokia Research Center, Finland.
Acknowledgements
-