Difference between revisions of "Playing to Lose"
(Created page with "Category:Patterns Category:Player Patterns Category:Needs work Category:Needs revision Category:Needs examples Category:Needs references Category:Pat...") |
(No difference)
|
Revision as of 06:42, 16 July 2014
The one-sentence "definition" that should be in italics.
Playing to Lose may not be considered gaming since one is not trying to have a better game state position than other players. However, there are many other ways of viewing this stance towards a game. First, Playing to Lose can be seen as an individual goal that players are try to reach. Second, it can be seen as focusing on storytelling or playing rather than gaming. Lastly, players may actually be competing against other players of who is best at Playing to Lose, something which may not be measured by the game state but even so can be judged by the players.
Contents
Examples
Anti-Examples
optional
Using the pattern
Diegetic Aspects
Interface Aspects
Narrative Aspects
Consequences
Relations
Storytelling Roleplaying Character Development
Can Instantiate
with ...
Can Modulate
-
Can Be Instantiated By
-
Can Be Modulated By
-
Possible Closure Effects
-
Potentially Conflicting With
-
History
An updated version of the pattern ... that was part of the original collection in the book Patterns in Game Design[1].
or
New pattern created in this wiki.
References
- ↑ Björk, S. & Holopainen, J. (2004) Patterns in Game Design. Charles River Media. ISBN1-58450-354-8.
Acknowledgements
-
