Difference between revisions of "FUBAR Enjoyment"
From gdp3
(→Relations) |
(→Relations) |
||
| Line 31: | Line 31: | ||
== Relations == | == Relations == | ||
| − | |||
[[Attention Swapping]] | [[Attention Swapping]] | ||
[[Cognitive Engrossment]] | [[Cognitive Engrossment]] | ||
[[Disruption of Focused Attention]] | [[Disruption of Focused Attention]] | ||
| − | |||
[[Gameplay Mastery]] | [[Gameplay Mastery]] | ||
[[Hovering Closures]] | [[Hovering Closures]] | ||
| Line 58: | Line 56: | ||
=== Can Be Instantiated By === | === Can Be Instantiated By === | ||
| − | - | + | [[Challenging Gameplay]], |
| + | [[Real-Time Games]] | ||
=== Can Be Modulated By === | === Can Be Modulated By === | ||
Revision as of 09:20, 1 September 2014
The enjoyment experienced when things are not going your way, but you are still in the fight; a specific type of Tension
This pattern is a still a stub.
FUBAR[1] Enjoyment FUBAR Enjoyment
Contents
Examples
Anti-Examples
optional
Using the pattern
Diegetic Aspects
Interface Aspects
Narration Aspects
Consequences
Relations
Attention Swapping Cognitive Engrossment Disruption of Focused Attention Gameplay Mastery Hovering Closures Limited Foresight Limited Planning Ability Complex Gameplay Survive The Show Must Go On Attention Demanding Simultaneous Challenges Ever Increasing Difficulty
Can Instantiate
Spectacular Failure Enjoyment, Tension
with Parties, PvE, or Teams in Multiplayer Games
Can Modulate
-
Can Be Instantiated By
Challenging Gameplay, Real-Time Games
Can Be Modulated By
-
Possible Closure Effects
-
Potentially Conflicting With
-
History
Updated version of the pattern "Spectacular Failure Enjoyment" first described in the paper Exploring aesthetical gameplay design patterns: camaraderie in four games[2].
References
- ↑ US miliary slang: F***ed up Beyond Recognition.
- ↑ Bergström, K., Björk, S. & Lundgren, S. 2010. Exploring aesthetical gameplay design patterns: camaraderie in four games. In Proceedings of MindTrek 2010.
Acknowledgments
-
