Difference between revisions of "Bluffing"
(→Can Be Modulated By) |
|||
| Line 24: | Line 24: | ||
== Using the pattern == | == Using the pattern == | ||
| − | |||
[[Uncertainty of Information]] is the primary requirement for [[Bluffing]] to be possible in a game. This since players need some part of the game state to be unknown to other players to be able to try [[Bluffing]]. | [[Uncertainty of Information]] is the primary requirement for [[Bluffing]] to be possible in a game. This since players need some part of the game state to be unknown to other players to be able to try [[Bluffing]]. | ||
| Line 62: | Line 61: | ||
== Consequences == | == Consequences == | ||
| − | The possibility of [[Bluffing]] in games creates uncertainty about results and thereby [[Tension]], especially for the [[Bluffing]] player. [[Bluffing]] modulates [[Social Interaction]] between players, and players bluffing must be able to control their [[Emotional Engrossment]]. This is especially true if the game is played face-to-face, i.e. with [[Player-Player Proximity]]. It should be noted that even though [[Player-Player Proximity]] can require more skill and produce more [[Tension]], it is not a requirement. As long as the possibilities and channels for Negotiation exist, there is a possibility for Bluffing. Bluffing in most cases leads to at least a possibility of Betrayal. | + | The possibility of [[Bluffing]] in games creates uncertainty about results and thereby [[Tension]], especially for the [[Bluffing]] player. [[Bluffing]] modulates [[Social Interaction]] between players, and players bluffing must be able to control their [[Emotional Engrossment]]. This is especially true if the game is played face-to-face, i.e. with [[Player-Player Proximity]] or [[Unmediated Social Interaction]]. It should be noted that even though [[Player-Player Proximity]] can require more skill and produce more [[Tension]], it is not a requirement. As long as the possibilities and channels for Negotiation exist, there is a possibility for Bluffing. Bluffing in most cases leads to at least a possibility of Betrayal. |
=== Can Instantiate === | === Can Instantiate === | ||
| Line 112: | Line 111: | ||
[[Direct Information]], | [[Direct Information]], | ||
[[Symmetric Information]], | [[Symmetric Information]], | ||
| − | [[Player-Player Proximity]] | + | [[Player-Player Proximity]], |
| + | [[Unmediated Social Interaction]] | ||
=== Possible Closure Effects === | === Possible Closure Effects === | ||
Revision as of 15:58, 8 February 2019
Conveying false information to other players in order to influence their behavior to one's own advantage.
Players have a possibility to convey false information to other players in order to benefit from the situation. Usually the basic information for Bluffing is something about the current game state, as is the case in Poker. It is possible, however, that Bluffing concerns other game components such as past events and actions, players' goals, and even players' strategies and intentions. One of the simplest games of this kind of Bluffing is an iterated version of Paper-Rock-Scissors, where the players try to outguess the other player's action based on previous plays and social clues.
Contents
Examples
Poker uses Bluffing as one of the basic characteristics of the game. The players do not have direct information about the other players' hands but try to guess the relative values based on the play of previous rounds, social clues, and how the players are playing the current round. Bluffing in Poker thus means that the player is trying to give a false impression to other players about the actual value of his hand.
The classic board game Diplomacy has all the information about positions of the players' armies and fleets available to all players. Bluffing in this game is based on giving the other players false information about the current strategies, goals, and agreements between the players. The game even has a specific diplomacy phase for giving the players the ability to scheme together with players against other players.
Battlestar Galactica: The Board Game is a board game where players are co-operating but some players are traitors they need to bluff that they are ordinary players. Dead of Winter has a similar feature, but where it is not certain that there is a player with opposing goals; all players however have personal goals that need to be fulfilled to be eligible to be part of a common victory. These personal goals can requires players to hide their intentions (so that other players don't ruin this even if the game is geared toward co-operation) but also allows any potential traitor to hide their goals behind personal goals.
The spy is one of the classes in the Team Fortress series. Players of this role can mask themselves to be seen as being other roles and belonging to the opposing team. Performing as the other roles and team without shooting (since this removes the disguise) through various forms of Bluffing is however required to place the spies in positions where they can be most efficient for their teams.
Using the pattern
Uncertainty of Information is the primary requirement for Bluffing to be possible in a game. This since players need some part of the game state to be unknown to other players to be able to try Bluffing.
In order to have the possibility for bluffing, the game should have Asymmetric Information together with means of players giving each other Indirect Information about game components, that is, the players do not have direct access to the required information but can get it from other players, usually via Social Interaction. Games that have Symmetric Information as well as Direct Information about game elements limit the possibilities for Bluffing but can still have it concerning players' goals, strategies, and intentions. This, however, also requires that players have a possibility of some kind of cooperation and that the player actions can have an effect on the other players' position in the game. An example of a game not satisfying these requirements is a 100 Meter Dash, or almost any other sports race, where Bluffing seems to be almost impossible.
Bluffing is possible in almost all cases of Negotiation and can be used to avoid situations where Randomness would normally let players feel Luck, since Bluffing can add a level of social skill even on totally random situations. Common examples where Bluffing is usually possible include Trading, Betting, and Bidding. An explicit type of game element that can be used for Bluffing is Alarms when these can be activated by players' actions.
Can Be Instantiated By
Asymmetric Information, Beat the Leader, Betrayal, Betting, Gameplay Mastery, Indirect Information, Imperfect Information Negotiation, Performance Uncertainty, Player Unpredictability, Secret Goals, Social Interaction, Trading,
End State Scoring together with Imperfect Information
Sanctioned Cheating together with PvP or TvT
Can Be Modulated By
Direct Information, Symmetric Information
Diegetic Aspects
Interface Aspects
Narration Aspects
Consequences
The possibility of Bluffing in games creates uncertainty about results and thereby Tension, especially for the Bluffing player. Bluffing modulates Social Interaction between players, and players bluffing must be able to control their Emotional Engrossment. This is especially true if the game is played face-to-face, i.e. with Player-Player Proximity or Unmediated Social Interaction. It should be noted that even though Player-Player Proximity can require more skill and produce more Tension, it is not a requirement. As long as the possibilities and channels for Negotiation exist, there is a possibility for Bluffing. Bluffing in most cases leads to at least a possibility of Betrayal.
Can Instantiate
Risk/Reward, Social Skills, Social Roles,
Can Modulate
Potentially Conflicting With
Relations
Can Instantiate
Emotional Engrossment, Risk/Reward, Social Skills, Social Roles, Tension
Can Modulate
Alarms, Bidding, Social Interaction,
Can Be Instantiated By
Asymmetric Information, Beat the Leader, Betrayal, Betting, Gameplay Mastery, Indirect Information, Imperfect Information Negotiation, Performance Uncertainty, Player Unpredictability, Secret Goals, Social Interaction, Trading, Uncertainty of Information
End State Scoring together with Imperfect Information
Sanctioned Cheating together with PvP or TvT
Can Be Modulated By
Direct Information, Symmetric Information, Player-Player Proximity, Unmediated Social Interaction
Possible Closure Effects
-
Potentially Conflicting With
History
An updated version of the pattern Bluffing that was part of the original collection in the book Patterns in Game Design[1].
References
- ↑ Björk, S. & Holopainen, J. (2004) Patterns in Game Design. Charles River Media. ISBN1-58450-354-8.
Acknowledgements
-
