Difference between revisions of "Non-Player Characters"

Revision as of 09:48, 8 December 2010

Diegetic persons in game worlds that are not controlled by players.

Note: the use of characters in this pattern and the pattern named Characters differs. Here, the usage of character complies to the common usage in the gaming community of referring to the graphical representation of a person in the game world (a sort of non-player version of the Avatar patterns). Although the common usage may also often imply the presence of the Agents and Characters patterns, this is not necessary and not presumed when used here.

Note: the abbreviation NPCs is very common for Non-Player Characters and is used here as well.

Examples

Using the pattern

A primary choice when designing NPCs is whether they should have agency within the Game World. This is typically achieved through the use of Algorithmic Agents or Game Masters, but can sometimes be done through Spectators (especially in games with Pervasive Gameplay, e.g. Prosopopeia).

Cut Scenes

Actions Have Diegetically Social Consequences

Detective Structure

Internal Conflicts

Internal Rivalry

Characters Enemies Torchlight Character Defining Actions Enforced Agent Behavior Factions

Awareness of Surroundings Open Destiny Own Agenda Unpredictable Behavior Binding Promises Brokering Competing for Attention Context Dependent Reaction Eavesdropping Either You are with Me or against Me False Accusations Favor Gain Allies Gossip Guide and Protect Hierarchical Factions Linked Destinies Maintaining Lies Match-Making Memory of Important Events

My Enemy’s Enemy is my Friend Others fortune affects own Mood Outcast Outspoken Support Requesting Support Social Gatekeeper Diegetic Social Maintenance Diegetic Social Norms Traitors Initiative Incremental Dialogue Processing Chunk-based Dialogue Processing Single-Initiative Dialogues Mixed Initiative Dialogues Basic Input Feedback Barge-In Canned Text Responses Diegetically Consistent Dialogues [[Context Dependent Dialogue Contextualized Conversational Responses Gameplay Integrated Conversations Location-Specific Dialogues Character-Specific Dialogues Colloquial Mastery Delicate Phrasing Ambiguous Responses

Note that NPCs do not actually need to be able to perform actions that change the game state, and more specifically players do not have to able to interact with them at all. The core of NPCs are their role in a Narration Structure, and as such they can exist only as Diegetically Outstanding Features or only be seen through Cut Scenes.

Diegetic Aspects

One design goal with NPCs can be that they should be believable as humans or self-aware individuals with the same emotional and social responses as those associated with humans. This can be rephrased as the goal of making players take an intentional stance towards the NPCs when anticipating their actions^[1].

A basic requirement for this to be possible is that the NPCs is in a Game World so that it has a space to act within (possible the real world for games using Real World Game Space). A second basic requirement is that they are Agents. As mentioned earlier, this is typically done through Algorithmic Agents or Game Masters but can in some cases also be done through Spectators.

There is actually another, even more basic, aspect of making NPCs to have Diegetic Consistency. This is that their representations should mimic their states as appropriate for the setting. In games like the Super Mario series this may be that Bob-ombs flash and sound before exploding

Visual Body Damage Dissectible Bodies

Interface Aspects

The amount of interaction available with NPCs can easily become overwhelming. Although breaking Diegetic Consistency, this is often solved through the use of Secondary Interface Screens to provide separate interfaces for activities such as Trading and Dialogues.

Narrative Aspects

Consequences

Since the creation of any NPC implies a Game World it consists in, have a NPC either requires a more fully developed Game World or creates one anyway but without Diegetic Consistency.

Relations

Can Instantiate

Can Modulate

Can Be Instantiated By

Game Elements

Can Be Modulated By

Possible Closure Effects

Potentially Conflicting With

History

New pattern created in this wiki. However, most of the material is collected from earlier research papers ^{[1] [2] [3] [4] [5]}.

References

1. ↑ ^{1.0 1.1} Lankoski, P. & Björk, S. (2007). Gameplay Design Patterns for Believable Non-Player Characters. Paper presentation at DiGRA 2007, Tokyo, Japan.
2. ↑ Lankoski, P. & Björk, S. (2007). Gameplay Design Patterns for Social Networks and Conflicts. Paper Presentation at Computer Game Design and Technology Workshop, John Moores University, Liverpool.
3. ↑ Lankoski, P. & Björk, S. (2008). Character-Driven Game Design: Characters, Conflicts, and Gameplay. Paper presentation at GDTW, Sixth International Conference in Game Design and Technology, 2008.
4. ↑ Brusk, J. & Björk, S. (2009). Gameplay Design Patterns for Game Dialogues. Paper presentation at DiGRA 2009: Breaking New Ground: Innovation in Games, Play, Practice and Theory. London, UK.
5. ↑ Lankoski, P. (2010). Character-Driven Game Design - A Design Approach and Its Foundations in Character Engagement. D.A. thesis at Aalto University. Publication Series of the School of Art and Design A 101. ISBN 978-952-60-0002-2.