Difference between revisions of "Encouraged Return Visits"
From gdp3
Line 21: | Line 21: | ||
[[Grinding]] | [[Grinding]] | ||
+ | [[Spawn Points]] | ||
[[Evolving Rule Sets]] | [[Evolving Rule Sets]] | ||
− | [[ | + | |
+ | [[Investments]] | ||
+ | |||
[[Resource Generators]] | [[Resource Generators]] | ||
− | [[ | + | |
+ | |||
+ | [[Persistent Game Worlds]] add another option: if they have [[Evolving Rule Sets]] players need to return regularly to keep up with the changes in the game. | ||
+ | |||
Line 37: | Line 43: | ||
== Relations == | == Relations == | ||
− | |||
=== Can Instantiate === | === Can Instantiate === | ||
− | |||
− | |||
=== Can Modulate === | === Can Modulate === | ||
=== Can Be Instantiated By === | === Can Be Instantiated By === | ||
+ | [[Evolving Rule Sets]] together with [[Persistent Game Worlds]] | ||
=== Can Be Modulated By === | === Can Be Modulated By === |
Revision as of 21:03, 31 January 2011
Game structures making players wanting to return to certain places or activities in the game.
This pattern is a still a stub.
Contents
Examples
Using the pattern
Players are encouraged to return frequently to a certain part of the game space (Based upon observations in Brathwaite, 2007);
Persistent Game Worlds add another option: if they have Evolving Rule Sets players need to return regularly to keep up with the changes in the game.
Diegetic Aspects
Interface Aspects
Narrative Aspects
Consequences
Relations
Can Instantiate
Can Modulate
Can Be Instantiated By
Evolving Rule Sets together with Persistent Game Worlds
Can Be Modulated By
Possible Closure Effects
Potentially Conflicting With
History
New pattern created in this wiki.
References
-
Acknowledgements
-