Difference between revisions of "Delayed Reciprocity"
| Line 18: | Line 18: | ||
== Using the pattern == | == Using the pattern == | ||
| − | The basis for having Delayed Reciprocity in the game is to have player actions, which can benefit another player without benefiting the player performing the action, and that there is a possibility of having situations where the return is paid back in the future. One explicit way to achieve [[Delayed Reciprocity]] is by making players complete [[Collaborative Actions]] that either just provide a [[Rewards|Reward]] for one player (e.g. attacks in [[Diplomacy]]) or have [[Player Decided Results and Individual Rewards]] under the control of one player (e.g. distributing funds after a vote in [[Junta]]). Another way is | + | The basis for having [[Delayed Reciprocity]] in the game is to have player actions, which can benefit another player without benefiting the player performing the action, and that there is a possibility of having situations where the return is paid back in the future. One explicit way to achieve [[Delayed Reciprocity]] is by making players complete [[Collaborative Actions]] that either just provide a [[Rewards|Reward]] for one player (e.g. attacks in [[Diplomacy]]) or have [[Player Decided Results and Individual Rewards]] under the control of one player (e.g. distributing funds after a vote in [[Junta]]). Another way is |
have [[Penalties]] that cause [[Helplessness]] in players (e.g. hanging from a ledge in the [[Left 4 Dead series]]) that other players can free them from. | have [[Penalties]] that cause [[Helplessness]] in players (e.g. hanging from a ledge in the [[Left 4 Dead series]]) that other players can free them from. | ||
| Line 28: | Line 28: | ||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| + | [[Committed Goals]] | ||
[[Altruistic Actions]] | [[Altruistic Actions]] | ||
| Line 41: | Line 40: | ||
== Consequences == | == Consequences == | ||
| − | Delayed Reciprocity gives players Anticipation of | + | [[Delayed Reciprocity]] gives players [[Anticipation]] of [[Delayed Effects]] that are [[Rewards]], thereby creating [[Hovering Closures]]. When the [[Delayed Reciprocity]] is not guaranteed it makes [[Betrayal]] possible, and requires players to make [[Risk/Reward]] considerations before making [[Leaps of Faith]]. [[Delayed Reciprocity]] combined with time delay and the possibility of not getting anything in return due to a [[Betrayal]], brings in [[Tension]] between the players involved in the situation. However, the situations involving [[Delayed Reciprocity]] also create a social bond between players and thereby promote [[Social Interaction]] even if it may be through the [[Social Dilemmas|Social Dilemma]] of [[Guilting]]. [[Delayed Reciprocity]] situations can also be used to give rise to [[Uncommitted Alliances]] as these basically are [[Delayed Reciprocity]] situations where there can be more than two players involved and that there is a mutual agreement of some kind between the players. |
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
== Relations == | == Relations == | ||
=== Can Instantiate === | === Can Instantiate === | ||
| + | [[Anticipation]], | ||
| + | [[Betrayal]], | ||
| + | [[Delayed Effects]], | ||
[[Guilting]], | [[Guilting]], | ||
| − | [[Social Interaction]] | + | [[Hovering Closures]], |
| + | [[Leaps of Faith]], | ||
| + | [[Rewards]], | ||
| + | [[Risk/Reward]], | ||
| + | [[Social Dilemmas]], | ||
| + | [[Social Interaction]], | ||
| + | [[Tension]], | ||
| + | [[Uncommitted Alliances]] | ||
=== Can Modulate === | === Can Modulate === | ||
| + | - | ||
=== Can Be Instantiated By === | === Can Be Instantiated By === | ||
| Line 58: | Line 64: | ||
=== Can Be Modulated By === | === Can Be Modulated By === | ||
| + | - | ||
=== Possible Closure Effects === | === Possible Closure Effects === | ||
| + | - | ||
=== Potentially Conflicting With === | === Potentially Conflicting With === | ||
| + | - | ||
== History == | == History == | ||
Revision as of 13:34, 6 February 2011
That returning gameplay favors cannot be done immediately.
In some games, players can have the possibility of helping each other even if they are not in the same team as long as they are not directly in opposition. When the game does not provide mechanisms for repaying those actions immediately, players do not have any guarantees that whatever beneficial actions they have done will be repaid later but simply have to rely on Delayed Reciprocity.
Contents
Examples
In Diplomacy the player can beside using them to invade areas, order his armies to support other players' invasions. This also means that if, for example, the player controlling Italy supports a French Army in attacking Spain, that player does not get anything in return immediately but must trust the one playing France to later repay him or her. While attacks in Diplomacy can be successful without help from others, in So Long Sucker players need help from others and must convince them to rely on Delayed Reciprocity. Intrigue has a similar design but sets up different commitments of Delayed Reciprocity against each other so not all can be fulfilled.
FarmVille and Mafia Wars allows players to help each other with the various tasks they have. Since players may not be playing at the same time they cannot expect help back at once, and instead have to trust in Delayed Reciprocity.
Players in the Left 4 Dead series can be incapacitated by damage or by falling off heights. They can be saved by other players and the other players are motivated to do so because the promise of Delayed Reciprocity will increase their own chances of completing levels.
Using the pattern
The basis for having Delayed Reciprocity in the game is to have player actions, which can benefit another player without benefiting the player performing the action, and that there is a possibility of having situations where the return is paid back in the future. One explicit way to achieve Delayed Reciprocity is by making players complete Collaborative Actions that either just provide a Reward for one player (e.g. attacks in Diplomacy) or have Player Decided Results and Individual Rewards under the control of one player (e.g. distributing funds after a vote in Junta). Another way is have Penalties that cause Helplessness in players (e.g. hanging from a ledge in the Left 4 Dead series) that other players can free them from.
While both these ways include an element of Risk/Reward due to the possibility of a future Betrayal, Free Gift Inventories as found in games such as FarmVille do not cost players anything to do (except possibly not being able to give the gifts to some but not others).
Social Organizations are formalized Alliances based around the concepts Social Interaction and some form of Delayed Reciprocity. However, the similar situation can arise in any exchange and Cooperation situation where there is a possibility of having at least perceived differences in the benefit for each of the players. For example, in Settlers of Catan the players can trade basic resources between each other and it is quite common that a player agrees on a less profitable trade expecting that the other player will return the favor later in the game. This can also happen in other forms of Trading.
Note, however, that Delayed Reciprocity does not require that the players have agreed upon the exchange beforehand or that the return is paid back to the same player. The "random acts of kindness" sometimes seen in MMORPGs where high level players help newbies in seemingly random ways create Delayed Reciprocity situations where the newbie, after having reached a high level, pays the return back to another newbie by helping him out.
Consequences
Delayed Reciprocity gives players Anticipation of Delayed Effects that are Rewards, thereby creating Hovering Closures. When the Delayed Reciprocity is not guaranteed it makes Betrayal possible, and requires players to make Risk/Reward considerations before making Leaps of Faith. Delayed Reciprocity combined with time delay and the possibility of not getting anything in return due to a Betrayal, brings in Tension between the players involved in the situation. However, the situations involving Delayed Reciprocity also create a social bond between players and thereby promote Social Interaction even if it may be through the Social Dilemma of Guilting. Delayed Reciprocity situations can also be used to give rise to Uncommitted Alliances as these basically are Delayed Reciprocity situations where there can be more than two players involved and that there is a mutual agreement of some kind between the players.
Relations
Can Instantiate
Anticipation, Betrayal, Delayed Effects, Guilting, Hovering Closures, Leaps of Faith, Rewards, Risk/Reward, Social Dilemmas, Social Interaction, Tension, Uncommitted Alliances
Can Modulate
-
Can Be Instantiated By
Can Be Modulated By
-
Possible Closure Effects
-
Potentially Conflicting With
-
History
An updated version of the pattern Delayed Reciprocity that was part of the original collection in the book Patterns in Game Design[1].
References
- ↑ Björk, S. & Holopainen, J. (2004) Patterns in Game Design. Charles River Media. ISBN1-58450-354-8.
