Difference between revisions of "Heterogeneous Game Element Ownership"

Revision as of 22:38, 4 March 2011

Game designs that require players to contribute with the game elements anew for each game instance.

Most games come with all components together so that playing the game only requires that one person owns the game or that it exists as a service. However, other games require players to each bring some the components to each new game instance. By doing so, each game instance has different starting points and players have direct influence over how the game evolve besides be able to spend time between games planning on how to use the game elements they own. Players who know what they want can of course also engage in trading with others to get hold of these.

Examples

Probably the oldest example of Heterogeneous Game Element Ownership are Marble Games, in which players have to bring the players they want to play with and possibly bet with. Other examples include miniatures games such as Warhammer Fantasy Battle and Warhammer 40K which let players build their own armies for a certain amount of points before the game begins. They can buy any from the lists contained in the various rule books but must own the actual miniatures, and for competitions they must be painted as well. Live Action Roleplaying Games set in fantasy or historical setting go a step further, requiring people participating in them to prepare beforehand by making the clothes and equipment they will be using.

Magic: The Gathering, Star Trek Customizable Card Game, and other Collectible Card Games let players challenge each other with decks they have built. The cards available to them are those bought in randomized sets and the ones they have acquired through trading. When people play Poker using their own money to place bets this can also be seen as an example of Heterogeneous Game Element Ownership but not when play is done with specialized markers since these game elements do not change between game instances (for casinos all the markers in use can be seen as a part of all game instances going on).

Writing piece of code that compete against other pieces of code is another way of having Heterogeneous Game Element Ownership. Crobots and P-Robots are examples of games using this design.

Using the pattern

By definition, Heterogeneous Game Element Ownership is meaningful for Multiplayer Games. The main design choice when using th pattern is deciding what parts of the game are available for players to reassemble to a whole for each game instance. Typical game elements used are Cards (e.g. Magic: The Gathering) or Units (e.g. Warhammer Fantasy Battle and Warhammer 40K). Less common are those that let players have Creative Control involving the Construction of Algorithmic Agents (e.g. Crobots and P-Robots).

Game designers need to consider the possible Combos when designing Heterogeneous Game Element Ownership. This since players will look for them as part of achieving Game Mastery but unless the types of combos are balanced this may make various elements unbalance and as an effect easily destroy Player Balance. This may be mitigated partly through Expansions that can introduce new rules with the new game elements that balance the game using a Evolving Rule Set, although this may also require that old elements are passed out as well.

Investments

Extra-Game Consequences

Consequences

Heterogeneous Game Element Ownership lets players have Freedom of Choice to construct their parts of a game through Game Element Insertion or by building their own Drawing Stacks. This also creates a Meta Game consisting of Construction where the game elements are Resources, at quite commonly also lead to Game Element Trading. When this Construction is to achieve different Combos, the pattern supports Strategic Planning

Strategic Knowledge as a form of Trans-Game Information.

Being able to bring their own game elements means that players can also customize them in different ways, be it painting miniatures, creating equipment and armor for live-action roleplaying games, or writing code to control agents. In all these cases Heterogeneous Game Element Ownership provide players with ways of having Creative Control. 

When rules exist to balance or control the number of game elements each player may bring to them game, this forces players to make Tradeoffs based on Risk/Reward calculations between which game elements to use.

When players contribute to games with Algorithmic Agents they have created this allows No Direct Player Influence.

Relations

Can Instantiate

Combos, Construction, Creative Control, Freedom of Choice, Game Element Insertion, Meta Games, Resources, Risk/Reward, Game Element Trading, Tradeoffs

with Algorithmic Agents

No Direct Player Influence

with Combos

Strategic Planning

Strategic Knowledge as a form of Trans-Game Information.

Can Modulate

Drawing Stacks, Multiplayer Games

Can Be Instantiated By

-

Can Be Modulated By

Evolving Rule Sets

Possible Closure Effects

Potentially Conflicting With

History

New pattern created in this wiki.

References

-

Acknowledgments

Daniel Bernhoff