Difference between revisions of "Strategic Knowledge"

Revision as of 18:57, 25 May 2011

Knowledge based on game elements, rules, possible actions, or evaluation functions of games without regards to specific game states.

This pattern is a still a stub.

Many games are easier to win if players have information about how the actions and events work, even though it is not necessarily required to be able to play. When this information is usable for all game sessions of the same game, the information is Strategic Knowledge about the game.

Examples

The locations of power-ups and pick-ups in first-person shooter deathmatches are essential knowledge for players to successfully compete against each other.

The knowledge of long sequences of combos in fighting games such as the Tekken or Dead or Alive series are Strategic Knowledge to players, even if they may not have the skill to successfully perform them.

Using the pattern

Providing players with Strategic Knowledge about rules are necessary in Self-Facilitated Games but can be used to create Smooth Learning Curves in other games. Besides rules, Strategic Knowledge can be about the configuration of the Game World, the value of different goals, how to perform certain actions, and the likelihood of different actions and events to take place in a game.

Knowledge about the Game World consists of knowing where Strategic Locations are, for example Shared Resources or Power-Ups, and can help Game World Navigation and winning Races. The knowledge about the correct values of goals consists mainly of knowing the Tradeoff values between various Resources,Rewards, and Penalties. This can be used to influence choices in Selectable Sets of Goals and Hierarchies of Goals, and knowing when to strive for Transfer of Control or what areas to try and achieve Area Control over. In cases of Unknown Goals, knowing what Predefined Goals exist is Strategic Knowledge in itself. Examples of Strategic Knowledge related to information about actions are how to perform Combos, what Achilles' Heels enemies have, and what places are most important to Guard. Knowing the likelihood of events and actions mainly consists of knowing all the possible Predictable Consequences in games or the probabilities of Dice and other randomizers in games with high degrees of Randomness. The easiest knowledge in these cases are predetermined Ultra-Powerful Events such as Moveable Tiles or Shrinking Game Worlds. Knowledge of the exact effects of Damage or Delayed Effects, and the Tradeoffs between Risk/Reward choices (especially in Betting) are also part of these types of Strategic Knowledge.

A typical way of letting players acquire Strategic Knowledge is through Game State Overviews, Cut Scenes, Experimenting, or being Spectators to games played by others. This becomes easier when the information presented is Perfect Information and, in the case of Spectators, requires that the information is Public Information.

Can Be Instantiated By

Crafting, Cutscenes, Diegetically Outstanding Features, Environmental Effects, Fixed Distributions, Predictable Consequences, Randomness, Stimulated Planning, Strategic Locations, Thematic Consistency, Zero-Player Games

Asymmetric Abilities together with Units

Combos together with Construction, Hidden Rules or Heterogeneous Game Element Ownership

Construction together with Emergent Gameplay

Vulnerabilities together with Weapons

Can Be Modulated By

Multiplayer Games

Diegetic Aspects

Interface Aspects

Narrative Aspects

Consequences

The possibility of developing Strategic Knowledge allows players to have gives Empowerment in relation to a game, and if it can successfully be applied to actions performed it can translate to having Game Mastery. It creates Stimulated Planning in game design both during and before gameplay in the form of Strategic Planning. The possibility to have Strategic Knowledge about a game allows Extra-Game Actions specifically for extracting and Memorizing that knowledge, and communicating the knowledge between players makes it into Extra-Game Information if done through Storytelling within the game or Trans-Game Information if done by other means outside the game. The possibility also gives an incentive for Replayability in the game to learn and make use of the Strategic Knowledge, for example, in Tournaments.

Strategic Knowledge affects players' Illusion of Influence depending on whether players actually have any influence. It typically removes players' ability to feel that they have Luck in the game but can be used to create knowledge-based Meta Games.

in both Single-Player Games, , and in Multiplayer Games - for Multiplayer Games this exchange may take place within the gameplay (players in two concurrent Single-Player Games can of course exchange information also but this is not within the same game session).

Can Instantiate

Extra-Game Actions, Internal Conflicts, Self-Facilitated Games, Social Interaction, , Trans-Game Information

with Evolving Rule Sets

Red Queen Dilemma

Potentially Conflicting With

Exaggerated Perception of Influence, Surprises

Relations

Can Instantiate

Empowerment, Extra-Game Actions, Game Mastery, Internal Conflicts, Self-Facilitated Games, Social Interaction, Stimulated Planning, Strategic Planning, Trans-Game Information

with Evolving Rule Sets

Red Queen Dilemma

Can Modulate

-

Can Be Instantiated By

Crafting, Cutscenes, Diegetically Outstanding Features, Environmental Effects, Fixed Distributions, Predictable Consequences, Randomness, Stimulated Planning, Strategic Locations, Thematic Consistency, Zero-Player Games

Asymmetric Abilities together with Units

Combos together with Construction, Hidden Rules or Heterogeneous Game Element Ownership

Construction together with Emergent Gameplay

Vulnerabilities together with Weapons

Can Be Modulated By

Multiplayer Games

Possible Closure Effects

-

Potentially Conflicting With

Exaggerated Perception of Influence, Surprises

History

An updated version of the pattern Strategic Knowledge that was part of the original collection in the book Patterns in Game Design^[1].

References

1. ↑ Björk, S. & Holopainen, J. (2004) Patterns in Game Design. Charles River Media. ISBN1-58450-354-8.

Acknowledgements

-