Minimalized Social Weight
Games that interfere little with players ability to social interact with other people while the games are being played.
Games are often played as a way to have social interaction with others. While the gameplay itself can in this way be a type of social interaction, games can pose obstacles for social interaction by requiring players to focus their attention on interacting with the game interface, updating the game state to reflect the effects of actions, or interacting with parts of the game system that isn't mediated to other players. Even when the games do not interrupt the flow of interaction between players, they may do so with non-players that the players are able to (or should be able to) interact with. While it may be impossible to fully avoid these issues, games that pose few obstacles to social interaction can be said to have Minimalized Social Weight.
Contents
Examples
Puzzle Games consisting on many levels that can be solved in rather short amount of time, e.g. Angry Birds, Continuity, and Sokoban, have Minimalized Social Weight since they can easily be abandoned and do not distract other surrounding activities.
Anti-Examples
Using the pattern
A starting point for achieving Minimalized Social Weight is to avoid the usually negative patterns of Analysis Paralysis and Excise. While deciding to aim for this is usually easy in a game design process, the pattern also typically conflicts with Attention Demanding and choosing which pattern to support may be a tougher design decision.
Interruptibility is one way of trying to minimize how much attention the game requires from players. This since even if players may need to focus on the gameplay while played they can easily stop to engage in social interaction with others. Issues with the solution exist for games with Mediated Gameplay or when the interruptions are perceived as causing Downtime since in both cases other players feel that their gameplay is being negatively affected.
While Self-Facilitated Games do provide Excise, they do provide Minimalized Social Weight since players can whenever they wish to interrupt non-social gameplay and Excise to have social interaction outside the game. Note that requiring or supporting Social Interaction does not in itself make games have Minimalized Social Weight, this both because interaction within the gameplay may be strongly affected by the game and because the pattern may also refer to interaction with non-players.
Interface Aspects
Besides the actual interaction required with a game's interface (which is part of the discussion above), the design of the interface can add social weight to a game. Interfaces that are difficult or time-consuming to use add social weight as do those that draw attention to themselves through their appearance. One example of how games can draw attention to themselves purely through the interface - and thereby work against the pattern of Minimalized Social Weight - is through having Juicy Interfaces.
Narrative Aspects
As media developed to be Attention Demanding with a narration of diegetic events, Cutscenes work against Minimalized Social Weight.
Consequences
Since it reduces the intrusion a game has on the social context in which it is played, Minimalized Social Weight makes it have both Pervasive Gameplay and Social Adaptability.
Relations
Can Instantiate
Pervasive Gameplay, Social Adaptability
Can Modulate
-
Can Be Instantiated By
Can Be Modulated By
-
Possible Closure Effects
-
Potentially Conflicting With
Attention Demanding, Analysis Paralysis, Cutscenes, Excise, Juicy Interfaces. Mimetic Interfaces
History
A pattern based on the concept of Social Weight, first introduced by Toney et al.[1].
References
- ↑ Toney, A. , Mulley, B., Thomas, B. H., & Piekarski, W. (2003). Social Weight: Designing to minimise the social consequences arising from technology use by the mobile professional. Special Issue of Personal and Ubiquitous Computing, Springer-Verlag London, 2003
