Difference between revisions of "Closure Points"

From gdp3
Jump to: navigation, search
(Relations)
(Relations)
Line 26: Line 26:
 
== Relations ==
 
== Relations ==
 
Instantiates: [[Limited Foresight]]
 
Instantiates: [[Limited Foresight]]
 
[[Irreversible Events]]
 
  
 
Modulates: [[Predictable Consequences]], [[Narration Structures]]
 
Modulates: [[Predictable Consequences]], [[Narration Structures]]

Revision as of 10:56, 7 July 2016

The one-sentence "definition" that should be in italics.

This pattern is a still a stub.

Examples

Games that provide levels also provide Closure Points. A few examples of the many games that does this include Candy Crush Saga, Doom, Staries, Pac-Man, and Tetris.

Using the pattern

Diegetic Aspects

Interface Aspects

Narration Aspects

Consequences

Relations

Instantiates: Limited Foresight

Modulates: Predictable Consequences, Narration Structures

Instantiated by: Tournaments, Transfer of Control

Modulated by: Committed Goals

Potentially conflicting with: Never Ending Stories


Can Instantiate

Value of Effort

Can Modulate

-

Can Be Instantiated By

Excluding Goals, Finale Levels, Higher-Level Closures as Gameplay Progresses, Irreversible Events, Quests, Save Points

Levels with Irreversible Events

Can Be Modulated By

Downtime

Possible Closure Effects

-

Potentially Conflicting With

-

History

An updated version of the pattern Closure Points that was part of the original collection in the book Patterns in Game Design[1].

References

  1. Björk, S. & Holopainen, J. (2004) Patterns in Game Design. Charles River Media. ISBN1-58450-354-8.

Acknowledgements

-