Difference between revisions of "Cooperation"
| Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
=== Examples === | === Examples === | ||
[[Left 4 Dead series]] | [[Left 4 Dead series]] | ||
| + | |||
| + | Example: Laying a puzzle together with friends has Cooperation between the players, but one can still see the puzzle as containing Competition (or even Conflict) against the game system or designers of the puzzle. | ||
| + | |||
| + | Example: The members of a Soccer team have to cooperate in order to beat the opposing team. | ||
| + | |||
| + | Example: In Lord of the Rings, the board game, the players coordinate their actions in order to defeat Sauron. The gameplay in this game is basically fully cooperative since the main goal, defeating Sauron, is common to all players, that is, either the players win the game or they all lose. | ||
| + | |||
| + | Example: MMORPG sections where there is no possibility for destructive player versus player actions, such as attacking or stealing, encourage Cooperation as the possibility of Betrayal is lessened. Further, a player that does not cooperate can lose compared to the other players if all the other players collaborate. | ||
See the category of [[:Category:Co-Op Games|Co-Op Games]] on this wiki for additional examples. | See the category of [[:Category:Co-Op Games|Co-Op Games]] on this wiki for additional examples. | ||
== Using the pattern == | == Using the pattern == | ||
| + | [[Drop-In/Drop-Out]] | ||
| + | [[Space Alert]] | ||
| + | [[Betrayal]] | ||
| + | [[Agents]] | ||
| + | [[Algorithmic Agents]] | ||
| + | [[Battlestar Galactica: The Board Game]] | ||
| + | [[Non-Player Characters]] | ||
| + | [[AI Players]] | ||
| + | [[Enemies]] | ||
| + | [[Multiplayer Games]] | ||
| + | [[Internal Conflicts]] | ||
| + | [[Free Gift Inventories]] | ||
| + | [[Invites]] | ||
| + | [[Altruistic Actions]] | ||
| + | [[Delayed Reciprocity]] | ||
| + | |||
| + | Players cooperate, i.e., coordinate their actions and share resources, in order to reach goals or subgoals of the game. | ||
| + | Cooperation in games allows players to divide goals between them and rely upon each other's abilities and resources. It may enable players to perform otherwise impossible actions or may make players feel that they are part of a team. The notion of a fully cooperative game, without any kind of competition or conflict, seems to be a moot point. Games without struggle to achieve some form of goal are not games at all, and any game containing competition or conflict situations automatically introduces struggle and makes full Cooperation impossible. | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | The simplest way to achieve Cooperation is to use Team Play, but equal levels of Cooperation can be achieved by introducing Mutual Goals with Shared Rewards to players. This creates incentives for the players to strive towards the goals together, and it has been shown that cooperative groups with Shared Rewards perform better, are more strongly motivated, and more willingly engage in Social Interaction. The Mutual Goals, however, do not need to be the highest level goals in the game; that is, it is possible to have Competition and Conflict between the players as a high level goal and use Mutual Goals as subgoals for reaching the high level goal. | ||
| + | |||
| + | All Alliances and Team Play are based on Cooperation between the players. Even the lowest level of Alliance, agreeing not to hinder or harm the other player, is a form of Cooperation, as the players coordinate their actions, even though they might not be trying to achieve Mutual Goals. | ||
| + | |||
| + | Every mode of play where the players perform actions together for mutual benefit requires Cooperation from basic Collaborative Actions to Trading and even Bidding. The benefit does not have to be direct to all the cooperating players but there can be a time delay for the Individual Rewards as is described in Delayed Reciprocity. | ||
| + | |||
| + | Shared Resources gives players the opportunity to decide between cooperating on how to use the Resources as fairly as possible or going into Conflict over how to use them. | ||
=== Diegetic Aspects === | === Diegetic Aspects === | ||
| Line 24: | Line 59: | ||
== Consequences == | == Consequences == | ||
| + | |||
| + | Cooperation increases Social Interaction between the players, as they have to coordinate their actions in order to reach the goals of the game. Having, or having the possibility, to cooperate allows players to make use of Competence Areas and provides a form of Constructive Play as the coordination in itself is a common achievement. Cooperation is also the basis for having Social Organizations and Social Dilemmas in the game. The different perceived Social Statuses of the players may lead to spontaneous chains of command in Cooperation situations. | ||
| + | |||
| + | Games where Cooperation and Competition coexist raise the level of Social Interaction even further and also increase the Tension between the players. When there is a possibility of Betrayal for the cooperating players, this also tends to raise the Tension and sometimes lowers the motivation for Cooperation. | ||
== Relations == | == Relations == | ||
Revision as of 14:02, 6 February 2011
Coordination of actions, information, and share resources in order to reach goals or subgoals of the game.
This pattern is a still a stub.
Contents
Examples
Example: Laying a puzzle together with friends has Cooperation between the players, but one can still see the puzzle as containing Competition (or even Conflict) against the game system or designers of the puzzle.
Example: The members of a Soccer team have to cooperate in order to beat the opposing team.
Example: In Lord of the Rings, the board game, the players coordinate their actions in order to defeat Sauron. The gameplay in this game is basically fully cooperative since the main goal, defeating Sauron, is common to all players, that is, either the players win the game or they all lose.
Example: MMORPG sections where there is no possibility for destructive player versus player actions, such as attacking or stealing, encourage Cooperation as the possibility of Betrayal is lessened. Further, a player that does not cooperate can lose compared to the other players if all the other players collaborate.
See the category of Co-Op Games on this wiki for additional examples.
Using the pattern
Drop-In/Drop-Out Space Alert Betrayal Agents Algorithmic Agents Battlestar Galactica: The Board Game Non-Player Characters AI Players Enemies Multiplayer Games Internal Conflicts Free Gift Inventories Invites Altruistic Actions Delayed Reciprocity
Players cooperate, i.e., coordinate their actions and share resources, in order to reach goals or subgoals of the game. Cooperation in games allows players to divide goals between them and rely upon each other's abilities and resources. It may enable players to perform otherwise impossible actions or may make players feel that they are part of a team. The notion of a fully cooperative game, without any kind of competition or conflict, seems to be a moot point. Games without struggle to achieve some form of goal are not games at all, and any game containing competition or conflict situations automatically introduces struggle and makes full Cooperation impossible.
The simplest way to achieve Cooperation is to use Team Play, but equal levels of Cooperation can be achieved by introducing Mutual Goals with Shared Rewards to players. This creates incentives for the players to strive towards the goals together, and it has been shown that cooperative groups with Shared Rewards perform better, are more strongly motivated, and more willingly engage in Social Interaction. The Mutual Goals, however, do not need to be the highest level goals in the game; that is, it is possible to have Competition and Conflict between the players as a high level goal and use Mutual Goals as subgoals for reaching the high level goal.
All Alliances and Team Play are based on Cooperation between the players. Even the lowest level of Alliance, agreeing not to hinder or harm the other player, is a form of Cooperation, as the players coordinate their actions, even though they might not be trying to achieve Mutual Goals.
Every mode of play where the players perform actions together for mutual benefit requires Cooperation from basic Collaborative Actions to Trading and even Bidding. The benefit does not have to be direct to all the cooperating players but there can be a time delay for the Individual Rewards as is described in Delayed Reciprocity.
Shared Resources gives players the opportunity to decide between cooperating on how to use the Resources as fairly as possible or going into Conflict over how to use them.
Diegetic Aspects
Interface Aspects
Narrative Aspects
Consequences
Cooperation increases Social Interaction between the players, as they have to coordinate their actions in order to reach the goals of the game. Having, or having the possibility, to cooperate allows players to make use of Competence Areas and provides a form of Constructive Play as the coordination in itself is a common achievement. Cooperation is also the basis for having Social Organizations and Social Dilemmas in the game. The different perceived Social Statuses of the players may lead to spontaneous chains of command in Cooperation situations.
Games where Cooperation and Competition coexist raise the level of Social Interaction even further and also increase the Tension between the players. When there is a possibility of Betrayal for the cooperating players, this also tends to raise the Tension and sometimes lowers the motivation for Cooperation.
Relations
Can Instantiate
Can Modulate
Can Be Instantiated By
Can Be Modulated By
Possible Closure Effects
Potentially Conflicting With
History
A revised version of the pattern Cooperation that was part of the original collection in the book Patterns in Game Design[1].
References
- ↑ Björk, S. & Holopainen, J. (2004) Patterns in Game Design. Charles River Media. ISBN1-58450-354-8.
