Difference between revisions of "Individual Rewards"
(→Relations) |
|||
| (12 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
[[Category:Patterns]] | [[Category:Patterns]] | ||
| − | |||
[[Category:Needs revision]] | [[Category:Needs revision]] | ||
[[Category:Needs examples]] | [[Category:Needs examples]] | ||
[[Category:Needs references]] | [[Category:Needs references]] | ||
| − | |||
[[Category:To be Published]] | [[Category:To be Published]] | ||
| − | + | ''Rewards in a game which are only given to one player.'' | |
| − | ' | + | |
| − | + | Games are typically set up so that there are rewards for certain actions or the completion of specific challenges. When these rewards are only given to one player - regardless if several players contributed - the rewards are [[Individual Rewards]]. | |
=== Examples === | === Examples === | ||
| + | In single-player games the rewards are naturally [[Individual Rewards]]. For example, in [[Tetris]] it is the player who performs the actions and fills in the rows who gets the reward. | ||
| − | + | Many multiplayer games that pitch players against each other have [[Individual Rewards]]. For example, in [[Diplomacy]] the player that performs a successful attack conquers the area even though there might be several other players supporting this action with their own armies. Likewise, rewards associated with killing an enemy in [[League of Legends]] or death-match games of [[Quake series|Quake]] are given to the player that dealt the final damage even if other players may have caused more total damage. | |
| − | + | ||
== Using the pattern == | == Using the pattern == | ||
| + | Like other types of [[Rewards]], designing [[Individual Rewards]] requires deciding on what specifically makes up the [[Rewards]] and when they should be given. Quite naturally, all [[Rewards]] in [[Single-Player Games]] are [[Individual Rewards]] but they can be used for various reasons in [[Multiplayer Games]]. First, they can increase [[Competition]] or [[Conflicts]] by giving clear indications between the difference of winning or losing specific gameplay activities. They can also decrease motivation or make more complex [[Collaborative Actions]], [[Cooperation]], and [[Mutual Goals]]. | ||
| − | + | For apparent reasons, the same [[Rewards]] cannot both be [[Individual Rewards]] and [[Shared Rewards]]. However, [[Altruistic Actions]] can make [[Shared Rewards]] into individual ones if players can renounce their right to parts of the [[Shared Rewards]]. | |
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
== Consequences == | == Consequences == | ||
| + | Rather obviously, [[Individual Rewards]] is a type of [[Rewards|Reward]]. [[Individual Rewards]] can cause [[Social Dilemmas]] if a player can see that others, or a collective, could have greater benefit of the [[Rewards]] than the player could have. One such example is games in which there exists [[Teams]] but team members are in [[Races]] with each other over [[Individual Rewards]], this not only causes [[Social Dilemmas]] but also [[Internal Rivalry]]. | ||
| + | |||
| + | When combined with [[Delayed Effects]] of [[Collaborative Actions]], [[Individual Rewards]] give rise to [[Delayed Reciprocity]]. | ||
== Relations == | == Relations == | ||
| Line 31: | Line 28: | ||
[[Social Dilemmas]] | [[Social Dilemmas]] | ||
| − | ==== with [[Collaborative Actions]] ==== | + | ==== with [[Collaborative Actions]] and [[Delayed Effects]] ==== |
[[Delayed Reciprocity]] | [[Delayed Reciprocity]] | ||
| Line 43: | Line 40: | ||
[[Cooperation]], | [[Cooperation]], | ||
[[Mutual Goals]], | [[Mutual Goals]], | ||
| − | [[Single-Player Games]] | + | [[Single-Player Games]] |
| − | + | ||
=== Can Be Instantiated By === | === Can Be Instantiated By === | ||
[[Altruistic Actions]] | [[Altruistic Actions]] | ||
Latest revision as of 14:39, 8 August 2015
Rewards in a game which are only given to one player.
Games are typically set up so that there are rewards for certain actions or the completion of specific challenges. When these rewards are only given to one player - regardless if several players contributed - the rewards are Individual Rewards.
Contents
Examples
In single-player games the rewards are naturally Individual Rewards. For example, in Tetris it is the player who performs the actions and fills in the rows who gets the reward.
Many multiplayer games that pitch players against each other have Individual Rewards. For example, in Diplomacy the player that performs a successful attack conquers the area even though there might be several other players supporting this action with their own armies. Likewise, rewards associated with killing an enemy in League of Legends or death-match games of Quake are given to the player that dealt the final damage even if other players may have caused more total damage.
Using the pattern
Like other types of Rewards, designing Individual Rewards requires deciding on what specifically makes up the Rewards and when they should be given. Quite naturally, all Rewards in Single-Player Games are Individual Rewards but they can be used for various reasons in Multiplayer Games. First, they can increase Competition or Conflicts by giving clear indications between the difference of winning or losing specific gameplay activities. They can also decrease motivation or make more complex Collaborative Actions, Cooperation, and Mutual Goals.
For apparent reasons, the same Rewards cannot both be Individual Rewards and Shared Rewards. However, Altruistic Actions can make Shared Rewards into individual ones if players can renounce their right to parts of the Shared Rewards.
Consequences
Rather obviously, Individual Rewards is a type of Reward. Individual Rewards can cause Social Dilemmas if a player can see that others, or a collective, could have greater benefit of the Rewards than the player could have. One such example is games in which there exists Teams but team members are in Races with each other over Individual Rewards, this not only causes Social Dilemmas but also Internal Rivalry.
When combined with Delayed Effects of Collaborative Actions, Individual Rewards give rise to Delayed Reciprocity.
Relations
Can Instantiate
with Collaborative Actions and Delayed Effects
with Races and Teams
Can Modulate
Collaborative Actions, Competition, Conflicts, Cooperation, Mutual Goals, Single-Player Games
Can Be Instantiated By
Can Be Modulated By
-
Possible Closure Effects
-
Potentially Conflicting With
History
An updated version of the pattern Individual Rewards that was part of the original collection in the book Patterns in Game Design[1].
References
- ↑ Björk, S. & Holopainen, J. (2004) Patterns in Game Design. Charles River Media. ISBN1-58450-354-8.
Acknowledgements
-
