Difference between revisions of "Information Passing"
(→Relations) |
|||
| Line 51: | Line 51: | ||
[[Predefined Goals]] | [[Predefined Goals]] | ||
[[Optional Goals]] | [[Optional Goals]] | ||
| + | [[Narration Structures]] | ||
| + | [[Gossip]] | ||
| + | [[Gain Information]] | ||
| + | [[Stealth]] | ||
=== Can Modulate === | === Can Modulate === | ||
| + | [[Narration Structures]] | ||
=== Can Be Instantiated By === | === Can Be Instantiated By === | ||
| + | [[Canned Text Responses]] | ||
[[Character Dialogues]] | [[Character Dialogues]] | ||
=== Can Be Modulated By === | === Can Be Modulated By === | ||
| + | [[Eavesdropping]] | ||
| + | [[Limited Set of Actions]] | ||
=== Potentially Conflicting With === | === Potentially Conflicting With === | ||
[[Perfect Information]] | [[Perfect Information]] | ||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
One design possibility regarding how the [[Information Passing]] is represented in the game environment is if it should be presented verbatim or symbolic to the players. While giving players the access to the exact information passed between the characters can more easily provide [[Clues]] or [[Red Herrings]] it typically requires more resources to develop this type of content for the game. In contrast, representing the [[Information Passing]] as symbols (see for example the [[Sims series]]) makes it easier to integrate with the game system and provides easily creates [[Ambiguous Responses]]. | One design possibility regarding how the [[Information Passing]] is represented in the game environment is if it should be presented verbatim or symbolic to the players. While giving players the access to the exact information passed between the characters can more easily provide [[Clues]] or [[Red Herrings]] it typically requires more resources to develop this type of content for the game. In contrast, representing the [[Information Passing]] as symbols (see for example the [[Sims series]]) makes it easier to integrate with the game system and provides easily creates [[Ambiguous Responses]]. | ||
| Line 75: | Line 78: | ||
Conversation becomes more tightly integrated with the Character-Driven Game Design gameplay and they can be used to tie the gameplay and the [[Narrative Structures]] together. | Conversation becomes more tightly integrated with the Character-Driven Game Design gameplay and they can be used to tie the gameplay and the [[Narrative Structures]] together. | ||
| − | Typically, a game event of containing [[Information Passing]] results in information being gained by players also, although it may not be the same information or only the knowledge that information has been passed. When information is revealed, this may cause [[Surprises]] and the unfolding of [[Narrative Structures]] but regardless of this, the event may be sufficient to complete [[Gain Information]] goals. | + | Typically, a game event of containing [[Information Passing]] results in information being gained by players also, although it may not be the same information or only the knowledge that information has been passed. When information is revealed, this may cause [[Surprises]] and the unfolding of [[Narrative Structures]] but regardless of this, the event may be sufficient to complete [[Gain Information]] goals. |
== History == | == History == | ||
Revision as of 16:34, 2 September 2010
The passing, from a character to another, of information that has influence on the gameplay.
When characters interact with each other in games it is quite common that they exchange information, and this regardless of if they are under player control or not. Besides the role this information can have in the development of a story, it can also trigger new goals for players, make them aware of action possibilities previously overlooked, or improve the chances of making good choices.
Contents
Examples
In Lies and Seductions[1] players can find out that a non-player character, Ed, is a good poker player but becomes legless when drunk through talking to other characters, and thereby uncover the possible game strategy to win money from Ed.
Players of the Thief series of games receive new goals, or have current goals canceled, as their characters overheard discussions between non-player characters.
Characters in the Sim series can quickly become friends or enemies depending on what they heard them saying.
Through the use of dialogue menus, players of the Mass Effect series can develop their relations to crew members under their command. The possible choices of dialogues depend not only on previous conversations but also on which attributes their characters' have.
The interactive drama Façade allows players to talk to two non-player characters through free text input. Information Passing takes place in both directions since not only do the characters' utterances provide clues for potential conversation topics but the interpretation of the input by the game's parser results in the characters changing their opinion about the player's character and each other.
Using the pattern
Information Passing is easily achieved as part of Character Dialogues in a game although the level of influence on gameplay can vary. While Information Passing resulting in the completion or failure of goals, it directly steers the gameplay but merely providing the player with information also lets the pattern provide Clues or Red Herrings. Similarly, the introduction of Predefined Goals or Optional Goals as an effect of Information Passing show two distinctly different ways of influencing the gameplay.
One design choice regarding Information Passing is if the events are predetermined Canned Text Responses which are part of Narration Structures (as for example in Thief series) or if the Information Passing is part of the game system (as for example in the Sim series). This is especially important regarding the information characters under players' control can pass on to others, since providing options beyond a single utterance or a Limited Set of Actions easily requires advanced parsing capabilities.
One specific way of creating Information Passing is to present it as Gossip between characters. Eavesdropping can be combined with this or work independently as another way to instantiate the pattern, but also open up to having Gain Information goals requiring Stealth.
Diegetic Aspects
One design possibility regarding how the Information Passing is represented in the game environment is if it should be presented verbatim or symbolic to the players. While giving players the access to the exact information passed between the characters can more easily provide Clues or Red Herrings it typically requires more resources to develop this type of content for the game. In contrast, representing the Information Passing as symbols (see for example the Sims series) makes it easier to integrate with the game system and provides easily creates Ambiguous Responses.
Interface Aspects
For simple Canned Text Responses the interface for supporting Information Passing can be just a button of a menu to choose from a Limited Set of Actions.
Narrative Aspects
Information Passing is typically a cornerstone in a game's Narration Structure since not only can it be used to parcel out information to players but it can also be used to establish Conflicts without the immediate use of Combat, e.g. to create Internal Rivalry within Factions.
Consequences
Conversation becomes more tightly integrated with the Character-Driven Game Design gameplay and they can be used to tie the gameplay and the Narrative Structures together.
Typically, a game event of containing Information Passing results in information being gained by players also, although it may not be the same information or only the knowledge that information has been passed. When information is revealed, this may cause Surprises and the unfolding of Narrative Structures but regardless of this, the event may be sufficient to complete Gain Information goals.
Whenever the event gives information not only to characters but also to players, this makes the pattern incompatible with Perfect Information.
Relations
Can Instantiate
Clues Red Herrings Predefined Goals Optional Goals Narration Structures Gossip Gain Information Stealth
Can Modulate
Can Be Instantiated By
Canned Text Responses Character Dialogues
Can Be Modulated By
Eavesdropping Limited Set of Actions
Potentially Conflicting With
One design possibility regarding how the Information Passing is represented in the game environment is if it should be presented verbatim or symbolic to the players. While giving players the access to the exact information passed between the characters can more easily provide Clues or Red Herrings it typically requires more resources to develop this type of content for the game. In contrast, representing the Information Passing as symbols (see for example the Sims series) makes it easier to integrate with the game system and provides easily creates Ambiguous Responses.
For simple Canned Text Responses the interface for supporting Information Passing can be just a button of a menu to choose from a Limited Set of Actions.
Information Passing is typically a cornerstone in a game's Narration Structure since not only can it be used to parcel out information to players but it can also be used to establish Conflicts without the immediate use of Combat, e.g. to create Internal Rivalry within Factions.
Conversation becomes more tightly integrated with the Character-Driven Game Design gameplay and they can be used to tie the gameplay and the Narrative Structures together.
Typically, a game event of containing Information Passing results in information being gained by players also, although it may not be the same information or only the knowledge that information has been passed. When information is revealed, this may cause Surprises and the unfolding of Narrative Structures but regardless of this, the event may be sufficient to complete Gain Information goals.
History
An updated version of the pattern Faction, first introduced in Lankoski 2010[1].
