Difference between revisions of "Playing to Lose"

From gdp3
Jump to: navigation, search
Line 17: Line 17:
 
=== Examples ===
 
=== Examples ===
  
==== Anti-Examples ====
 
optional
 
  
 
== Using the pattern ==
 
== Using the pattern ==
 +
As explained above, the [[Playing to Lose]] does not actually focus on players' success or failure. Instead, it focuses on how [[Characters]] lose and can by this be seen as a way players can decide to take [[Character Development]]. This requires that [[Characters]] have an [[Open Destiny]].
 +
 +
  
 
=== Diegetic Aspects ===
 
=== Diegetic Aspects ===
Line 29: Line 30:
  
 
== Consequences ==
 
== Consequences ==
 +
[[Playing to lose]] is typically undertaken by players that
 +
 +
[[Storytelling]]
 +
[[Roleplaying]]
 +
[[Character Development]]
 +
 
[[Spectacular Failure Enjoyment]]
 
[[Spectacular Failure Enjoyment]]
 +
 +
In the Nordic LARP tradition,
 +
<ref name="nordic"/>
 +
 +
[[Cooperation]]
  
 
== Relations ==
 
== Relations ==
Line 35: Line 47:
 
[[Roleplaying]]
 
[[Roleplaying]]
 
[[Character Development]]
 
[[Character Development]]
 +
[[Characters]]
 +
[[Open Destiny]]
 +
[[Cooperation]]
  
 
=== Can Instantiate ===
 
=== Can Instantiate ===
Line 62: Line 77:
 
<references>
 
<references>
 
<ref name="Badminton">[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Badminton_at_the_2012_Summer_Olympics_%E2%80%93_Women's_doubles Entry] in Wikipedia for Badminton at the 2012 Summer Olympics – Women's doubles.</ref>
 
<ref name="Badminton">[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Badminton_at_the_2012_Summer_Olympics_%E2%80%93_Women's_doubles Entry] in Wikipedia for Badminton at the 2012 Summer Olympics – Women's doubles.</ref>
 +
<ref name="Nordic">[http://nordiclarp.org/wiki/Playing_to_Lose Entry] for [[Playing to Lose]] in the Nordic LARP wiki.</ref>
 
</references>
 
</references>
  
 
== Acknowledgements ==
 
== Acknowledgements ==
 
-
 
-

Revision as of 07:05, 16 July 2014

The one-sentence "definition" that should be in italics.

Playing to Lose may not be considered gaming since one is not trying to have a better game state position than other players. However, there are many other ways of viewing this stance towards a game. First, Playing to Lose can be seen as an individual goal that players are try to reach. Second, it can be seen as focusing on storytelling or playing rather than gaming. Lastly, players may actually be competing against other players of who is best at Playing to Lose, something which may not be measured by the game state but even so can be judged by the players.

Note: This pattern does not examine intentionally loosing a game instances for extra-game reasons such as winning bets, having better positions in tournaments, etc. The eight disqualified players in Badminton at the 2012 Summer Olympics are example of the losing in order to manipulate which team they would meet in the next round[1]. For a further example of other ways of playing to lose, see the documentary "Playing to Lose" which examines if the Pittsburgh Penguins Hockey team intentionally lost games during the 1983-84 season to get the first pick of players for the next season.

Examples

Using the pattern

As explained above, the Playing to Lose does not actually focus on players' success or failure. Instead, it focuses on how Characters lose and can by this be seen as a way players can decide to take Character Development. This requires that Characters have an Open Destiny.


Diegetic Aspects

Interface Aspects

Narrative Aspects

Consequences

Playing to lose is typically undertaken by players that

Storytelling Roleplaying Character Development

Spectacular Failure Enjoyment

In the Nordic LARP tradition, [2]

Cooperation

Relations

Storytelling Roleplaying Character Development Characters Open Destiny Cooperation

Can Instantiate

Spectacular Failure Enjoyment

with ...

Can Modulate

-

Can Be Instantiated By

-

Can Be Modulated By

-

Possible Closure Effects

-

Potentially Conflicting With

-

History

New pattern created in this wiki.

References

  1. Entry in Wikipedia for Badminton at the 2012 Summer Olympics – Women's doubles.
  2. Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; no text was provided for refs named nordic

Cite error: <ref> tag with name "Nordic" defined in <references> is not used in prior text.

Acknowledgements

-