Difference between revisions of "Possibility of Anonymity"

Revision as of 21:17, 4 August 2011

That players have the possibility to not reveal their identities while playing a game.

Games are often a way to have social activities with others. This does not however always mean that players wish to let other players know much about themselves, e.g. because they are worried about their performance or wish to avoid developing any kind of social relation. To do this, games may give players a Possibility of Anonymity.

Examples

Players of online games such as the Battlefield series or the Left 4 Dead series can choose what names they want to be identified by, and by not chatting or using voice communications they can keep other players from knowing who they are. The characters created by players of computer-mediated roleplaying games such Kingdoms, Ultima Online, and World of Warcraft can protect identities in the same fashion, but the effort of maintaining the same alter ego for prolonged period of times usually means that long-time players show their normal selves.

Using the pattern

The trivial solution to providing players with a Possibility of Anonymity is to make Single-Player Games. In other cases, the players need to have their contact with each other mediated through Avatars, Handles, or Player Characters and this requires either Communication Channels that can enforce anonymity - one such possible Communication Channel is Dedicated Game Facilitators. Quite obviously, this makes the pattern difficult to combine with Unmediated Social Interaction. Even when this is avoided, games with mediated Social Interaction may require players to engage in Roleplaying to appear to be somebody they are not if they wish to be anonymous.

Even though it cannot instantiate Possibility of Anonymity on its own, having support for Late Arriving Players in games can make it easier since these games cannot rely on all players knowing each others identity.

Since Public Player Statistics can provide information about players spanning beyond game instances this may ruin players Possibility of Anonymity.

Interface Aspects

Supporting a Possibility of Anonymity often requires interfaces that can mediate their interactions, and this in turn requires Communication Channels.

Consequences

The option of being oneself or hiding who one is while playing is a Freedom of Choice.

As mentioned before, games with Social Interaction may force players to Roleplay to make use of a Possibility of Anonymity.

Relations

Can Instantiate

Freedom of Choice

with Social Interaction

Roleplaying

Can Modulate

-

Can Be Instantiated By

Single-Player Games

Mediated Gameplay together with Handles, Avatars, or Player Characters

Communication Channels together with Handles, Avatars, or Player Characters

Dedicated Game Facilitators together with Handles, Avatars, or Player Characters

Can Be Modulated By

Late Arriving Players

Possible Closure Effects

-

Potentially Conflicting With

Public Player Statistics, Unmediated Social Interaction

History

New pattern created in this wiki.

References

-

Acknowledgements

Johan Peitz