Real Life Activities Affect Game State

From gdp3
Revision as of 07:48, 23 August 2012 by Staffan Björk (Talk | contribs) (Relations)

Jump to: navigation, search

The one-sentence "definition" that should be in italics.

This pattern is a still a stub.

Examples

The energy usage in a household is the primary input to the game Power Explorer, indirectly causing the players' everyday behavior affect the game through how much electrical energy their activities use.

Zombie Run

Anti-Examples

Using the pattern

Player-Location Proximity does not directly make Real Life Activities Affect Game State part of the gameplay of a game, but


Diegetic Aspects

Interface Aspects

Narrative Aspects

Consequences

Relations

Can Instantiate

Changes in Perception of Real World Phenomena due to Gameplay, Extra-Game Input, Pervasive Gameplay, Ubiquitous Gameplay

Can Modulate

-

Can Be Instantiated By

Physical Navigation, Player Physical Prowess

Extra-Game Input together with Pervasive Gameplay

Can Be Modulated By

-

Possible Closure Effects

-

Potentially Conflicting With

Mimetic Interfaces

History

An updated version of the pattern ... that was part of the original collection in the book Patterns in Game Design[1].

or

New pattern created in this wiki.

References

-

Acknowledgements

  1. Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; no text was provided for refs named Bjork_.26_Holopainen_2004