Difference between revisions of "Repetitive Gameplay"

Revision as of 15:41, 15 August 2016

Gameplay that requires the same type of actions or choice repeatedly to a player.

This pattern is a still a stub.

Examples

Many roll and move Board Games, e.g. Monopoly and Pachisi, require players to do the same game action every time it is their turn. Even if they can have some freedom of choice, for example to buy or not buy land or choose which token to move, they will be doing the same gameplay action the next time it is their turn.

Many early Arcade Games by necessity had Repetitive Gameplay. Examples include Asteroids, Donkey Kong, Pac-Man, and Pong.

Using the pattern

Repetitive Gameplay is often seen as something bad in a game, if for nothing else that it will limit the novelty and potential for Gameplay Mastery when the gameplay provided has been mastered. However, Repetitive Gameplay also lets players train on that gameplay (which can support learning Gameplay Mastery and support Cognitive, Sensory-Motoric, or Spatial Engrossment. It should be noted that Repetitive Gameplay can be viewed as applying to the whole gameplay — like in Asteroids and Pac-Man — or more localized by for example having certain Levels require a certain type of actions.

Generic Adversaries, Grinding, Micromanagement, and Pottering are general ways of enticing Repetitive Gameplay. However, Repetitive Gameplay can occur in any game so those wishing to avoid it while creating a game need to test if this occurs with play tests. In some games Repetitive gameplay can occur due to the best possible actions for players make them recreate previous game states. One way of handle this is to use Repetition of Position Draws, that is making a game end in a draw if the same game state is repeated enough times. Chess does if a position occurs three times while Shogi does it if a position occurs four times. Go instead has the 'rule of ko' to prohibit immediate recreation of the previous position after an opponent's move. This does however not avoid Repetitive Gameplay overall since several ko positions can together create endless cycles. This occurs rarely enough that few players need to care about this, but several Go organizations have superko rules forbidding the recreation of any previous game state.

Narration Aspects

Repetitive Gameplay can be difficult to combine with Narration Structures unless they are also based upon cyclic repetition, e.g. the story structures in the movies Groundhog Day or Edge of Tomorrow. While The Legend of Zelda: Majora's Mask does have such as structure, the amount of gameplay available in each cycle makes this game not have Repetitive Gameplay.

Consequences

Repetitive Gameplay has a volatile relation with Value of Effort; it can both cause players to feel that there is little Value of Effort in a game and cause players to feel they have achieved something because they have endured or handled it. Games with Grinding shows this most clearly since the Repetitive Gameplay that Grinding offers or requires can provoke both these types of experiences. Repetitive Gameplay can also work against Freedom of Choice and Player Agency since it by definition forces players to have a particular type of gameplay, and this gameplay may have few possibilities for players to choose how to play.

Relations

Can Instantiate

Cognitive Engrossment, Sensory-Motoric Engrossment, Spatial Engrossment, Value of Effort

Can Modulate

Gameplay Mastery

Can Be Instantiated By

Generic Adversaries, Grinding, Micromanagement, Pottering

Can Be Modulated By

Repetition of Position Draws

Possible Closure Effects

-

Potentially Conflicting With

Freedom of Choice, Player Agency, Value of Effort

History

New pattern created in this wiki.

References

-

Acknowledgements

-