Difference between revisions of "Fudged Results"
(→Examples) |
|||
| (20 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
[[Category:Patterns]] | [[Category:Patterns]] | ||
| + | [[Category:Balancing Patterns]] | ||
[[Category:Needs revision]] | [[Category:Needs revision]] | ||
[[Category:Needs examples]] | [[Category:Needs examples]] | ||
[[Category:Needs references]] | [[Category:Needs references]] | ||
| − | |||
[[Category:Patterns created on the Wiki]] | [[Category:Patterns created on the Wiki]] | ||
''Ignoring or having hidden exceptions to the algorithms determining effects of actions.'' | ''Ignoring or having hidden exceptions to the algorithms determining effects of actions.'' | ||
| Line 17: | Line 17: | ||
== Using the pattern == | == Using the pattern == | ||
| − | A first decision regarding [[Fudged Results]] is if they should be possible to create for players or by [[Dedicated Game Facilitators]]. [[Fudged Results]] by [[Dedicated Game Facilitators]] or [[Game Masters]] need to be made secretly to not impede on players' perception of having a [[Determinable Chance to Succeed]]. An exception to this is if the [[Fudged Results]] are in itself algorithmically determined, which simply removes the pattern itself since players' can incorporate that algorithm into the normal one when it is noticed. [[Dynamic Difficulty Adjustment]] is most often done after the fact to adjust difficult for the players' next attempt at something in the game, but can also be used to create [[Fudged Results]] sometimes. | + | A first decision regarding [[Fudged Results]] is if they should be possible to create for players or by [[Dedicated Game Facilitators]]. [[Fudged Results]] by [[Dedicated Game Facilitators]] or [[Game Masters]] need to be made secretly to not impede on players' perception of having a [[Determinable Chance to Succeed]], e.g. through the use of [[Feigned Die Rolls]]. An exception to this is if the [[Fudged Results]] are in itself algorithmically determined, which simply removes the pattern itself since players' can incorporate that algorithm into the normal one when it is noticed. [[Dynamic Difficulty Adjustment]] is most often done after the fact to adjust difficult for the players' next attempt at something in the game, but can also be used to create [[Fudged Results]] sometimes. |
| − | [[Self-Facilitated Games]] | + | [[Self-Facilitated Games]] let players (and possibly [[Game Masters]]) create [[Fudged Results|Fudge Results]] when they wish due to them providing [[Free Game Element Manipulation]] as a default. If the [[Fudged Results]] instead are to be encoded into the rules, e.g. to empower players, this is easiest done through [[Extra Chances]]. Another possibility is to use [[Tokens]] that provide the [[Privileged Abilities|Privileged Ability]] to ignore an adverse effect by being discarded (using [[Cards]], as for example done in [[Monopoly]] or in [[Dominion]] with the ''moat'' card, allow these to be [[Surprises]]). |
When players can perform [[Fudged Results]] the ability to do so needs to be a [[Limited Resources|Limited Resource]] for balance purposes and making [[Value of Effort]] possible. They do not need to be [[Non-Renewable Resources]] however, since they can be replenished as [[Rewards]] (as is done for the ''fate points'' in [[Warhammer Fantasy Roleplay]]). | When players can perform [[Fudged Results]] the ability to do so needs to be a [[Limited Resources|Limited Resource]] for balance purposes and making [[Value of Effort]] possible. They do not need to be [[Non-Renewable Resources]] however, since they can be replenished as [[Rewards]] (as is done for the ''fate points'' in [[Warhammer Fantasy Roleplay]]). | ||
| Line 28: | Line 28: | ||
=== Narrative Aspects === | === Narrative Aspects === | ||
| − | Improvised [[Fudged Results]] by [[Game Masters]] can require [[Storytelling]] to explain some unusual circumstance that changes the outcome. This can also introduce elements of [[Surprise]] into the game. | + | Improvised [[Fudged Results]] by [[Game Masters]] can require [[Storytelling]] to explain some unusual circumstance that changes the outcome. This can also introduce elements of [[Surprises|Surprise]] into the game. |
== Consequences == | == Consequences == | ||
| − | [[Fudged Results]] are [[Ultra-Powerful Events]] | + | [[Fudged Results]] are [[Ultra-Powerful Events]] that in a paradoxically way may in some cases be initiated by players. They typically skews [[Randomness]] and the action perform by, or against, [[Enemies]]. Given that [[Fudged Results]] cannot be used too often without ruining players' [[Value of Effort]], they are quite likely to be called on in situations to hinder [[Life Penalties]], [[Player Elimination]], or [[Game Termination Penalties]]; depending on their frequency this either modifies or cancels these patterns. These, and lesser events that may be controlled by [[Fudged Results]] make the pattern a way to support [[Social Adaptability]] in a game so that players have the gameplay experience they want rather than want the game system would mechanically produce for them. |
| − | When players can create [[Fudged Results]] | + | When players can create [[Fudged Results]], they are [[Facilitating Rewards]] providing them with [[Empowerment]] and quite possibly an [[Exaggerated Perception of Influence]]. They can also be used for [[Misfortune Mitigation]] by these players. In contrast, when created by [[Dedicated Game Facilitators]] they can instead provide [[Balancing Effects]]. In both cases, they can provide tools for [[Social Roles]] related to mediating or facilitating games. |
== Relations == | == Relations == | ||
=== Can Instantiate === | === Can Instantiate === | ||
| − | [[Empowerment]], [[Exaggerated Perception of Influence]], [[Privileged Abilities]], [[Surprises]], [[Ultra-Powerful Events]] | + | [[Empowerment]], [[Exaggerated Perception of Influence]], |
| + | [[Facilitating Rewards]], | ||
| + | [[Misfortune Mitigation]], | ||
| + | [[Privileged Abilities]], | ||
| + | [[Social Adaptability]], | ||
| + | [[Social Roles]], | ||
| + | [[Surprises]], | ||
| + | [[Rewards]], | ||
| + | [[Ultra-Powerful Events]] | ||
| + | |||
| + | ==== with [[Dedicated Game Facilitators]] ==== | ||
| + | [[Balancing Effects]] | ||
=== Can Modulate === | === Can Modulate === | ||
| − | [[ | + | [[Enemies]], |
| + | [[Game Termination Penalties]], | ||
| + | [[Life Penalties]], | ||
| + | [[Player Elimination]], | ||
| + | [[Randomness]] | ||
=== Can Be Instantiated By === | === Can Be Instantiated By === | ||
| − | [[Dedicated Game Facilitators]], [[Dynamic Difficulty Adjustment]], [[Evolving Rule Sets]], [[Game | + | [[Collectible Card Games]], |
| + | [[Dedicated Game Facilitators]], [[Dynamic Difficulty Adjustment]], [[Evolving Rule Sets]], | ||
| + | [[Extra Chances]], | ||
| + | [[Feigned Die Rolls]], | ||
| + | [[Free Game Element Manipulation]], | ||
| + | [[Game Masters]], [[Save-Load Cycles]], [[Self-Facilitated Games]], | ||
| + | [[Tokens]] | ||
=== Can Be Modulated By === | === Can Be Modulated By === | ||
| − | [[Limited Resources]], [[Non-Renewable Resources]], [[ | + | [[Limited Resources]], [[Non-Renewable Resources]], |
| + | [[Storytelling]] | ||
=== Possible Closure Effects === | === Possible Closure Effects === | ||
| Line 52: | Line 74: | ||
=== Potentially Conflicting With === | === Potentially Conflicting With === | ||
| − | [[Player Elimination]], [[Value of Effort]] | + | [[Determinable Chance to Succeed]], |
| + | [[Game Termination Penalties]], | ||
| + | [[Life Penalties]], | ||
| + | [[Player Elimination]], | ||
| + | [[Value of Effort]] | ||
== History == | == History == | ||
| Line 61: | Line 87: | ||
== Acknowledgments == | == Acknowledgments == | ||
| − | Malte Elson, Guy Lima, Jr., Gillian Smith, Johan Wingård | + | Jason Begy, Kjell Claesson, Andreas Ekeroot, Malte Elson, Ken Hullett, Guy Lima, Jr., Jonathan Osborne, Johan Peitz, Gillian Smith, Tim Stevens, Richard Wetzel, Johan Wingård |
Latest revision as of 11:38, 9 March 2018
Ignoring or having hidden exceptions to the algorithms determining effects of actions.
Players often experiences setbacks during gameplay but some setbacks can be especially bad or destroy the gameplay completely. To avoid this, game facilitators can modify the outcomes to mitigate the worse effects and possibly do this without the players knowing this. Players can also be give the possibility to create Fudged Results but this is then typically done so it is only possible to do rarely during gameplay.
Contents
Examples
Game Masters in games such as GURPS and Basic Role-Playing can provide Fudged Results at all times except when players roll dice to determine overcomes. Players can however also be given limited powers to recreate Fudged Results, the fate point system used in Warhammer Fantasy Roleplay is an example of this, although game masters determines the effect of using these fate points.
The Get Out of Jail Free card in Monopoly is an early example of Fudged Results under the players control. Dominion has similar reaction cards such as the moat card which allows players to not be affected by the adverse effects of others players cards. The card Counterspell in Magic: The Gathering works similarly be interrupting and removing the effect of a spell that has just been cast by other player. Collectible Card Games in general can introduce such cards as balancing factors; the Star Trek Customizable Card Game went so far as to include the card Writ of Accountability which fudges the result of other players having fudged too many previous results so that these automatically lose the game.
Bloodbowl allows players to create Fudged Results by using rerolls that are provided for the team or for specific star players.
Using the pattern
A first decision regarding Fudged Results is if they should be possible to create for players or by Dedicated Game Facilitators. Fudged Results by Dedicated Game Facilitators or Game Masters need to be made secretly to not impede on players' perception of having a Determinable Chance to Succeed, e.g. through the use of Feigned Die Rolls. An exception to this is if the Fudged Results are in itself algorithmically determined, which simply removes the pattern itself since players' can incorporate that algorithm into the normal one when it is noticed. Dynamic Difficulty Adjustment is most often done after the fact to adjust difficult for the players' next attempt at something in the game, but can also be used to create Fudged Results sometimes.
Self-Facilitated Games let players (and possibly Game Masters) create Fudge Results when they wish due to them providing Free Game Element Manipulation as a default. If the Fudged Results instead are to be encoded into the rules, e.g. to empower players, this is easiest done through Extra Chances. Another possibility is to use Tokens that provide the Privileged Ability to ignore an adverse effect by being discarded (using Cards, as for example done in Monopoly or in Dominion with the moat card, allow these to be Surprises).
When players can perform Fudged Results the ability to do so needs to be a Limited Resource for balance purposes and making Value of Effort possible. They do not need to be Non-Renewable Resources however, since they can be replenished as Rewards (as is done for the fate points in Warhammer Fantasy Roleplay).
Save-Load Cycles let players ignore all the events in play sessions, and are thus a course way of creating Fudged Results.
Collectible Card Games or other games with Evolving Rule Sets can cause players to feel that some results are Fudged Results because they might not be aware of the presences of rules introduced.
Narrative Aspects
Improvised Fudged Results by Game Masters can require Storytelling to explain some unusual circumstance that changes the outcome. This can also introduce elements of Surprise into the game.
Consequences
Fudged Results are Ultra-Powerful Events that in a paradoxically way may in some cases be initiated by players. They typically skews Randomness and the action perform by, or against, Enemies. Given that Fudged Results cannot be used too often without ruining players' Value of Effort, they are quite likely to be called on in situations to hinder Life Penalties, Player Elimination, or Game Termination Penalties; depending on their frequency this either modifies or cancels these patterns. These, and lesser events that may be controlled by Fudged Results make the pattern a way to support Social Adaptability in a game so that players have the gameplay experience they want rather than want the game system would mechanically produce for them.
When players can create Fudged Results, they are Facilitating Rewards providing them with Empowerment and quite possibly an Exaggerated Perception of Influence. They can also be used for Misfortune Mitigation by these players. In contrast, when created by Dedicated Game Facilitators they can instead provide Balancing Effects. In both cases, they can provide tools for Social Roles related to mediating or facilitating games.
Relations
Can Instantiate
Empowerment, Exaggerated Perception of Influence, Facilitating Rewards, Misfortune Mitigation, Privileged Abilities, Social Adaptability, Social Roles, Surprises, Rewards, Ultra-Powerful Events
with Dedicated Game Facilitators
Can Modulate
Enemies, Game Termination Penalties, Life Penalties, Player Elimination, Randomness
Can Be Instantiated By
Collectible Card Games, Dedicated Game Facilitators, Dynamic Difficulty Adjustment, Evolving Rule Sets, Extra Chances, Feigned Die Rolls, Free Game Element Manipulation, Game Masters, Save-Load Cycles, Self-Facilitated Games, Tokens
Can Be Modulated By
Limited Resources, Non-Renewable Resources, Storytelling
Possible Closure Effects
-
Potentially Conflicting With
Determinable Chance to Succeed, Game Termination Penalties, Life Penalties, Player Elimination, Value of Effort
History
New pattern created in this wiki.
References
-
Acknowledgments
Jason Begy, Kjell Claesson, Andreas Ekeroot, Malte Elson, Ken Hullett, Guy Lima, Jr., Jonathan Osborne, Johan Peitz, Gillian Smith, Tim Stevens, Richard Wetzel, Johan Wingård
