Difference between revisions of "Tiered Participation"
(→Using the pattern) |
(→Using the pattern) |
||
| Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
== Using the pattern == | == Using the pattern == | ||
| − | The main requirement of [[Tiered Participation]] is rather obviously that there should be several different ways of playing the game in regards to actions required and time spent while still be regarded as a player. Two concrete ways of doing this is through supporting [[Backseat Players]] or [[Functional Roles]], where the roles in the latter case differ in commitment required besides actual gameplay actions provided. | + | The main requirement of [[Tiered Participation]] is rather obviously that there should be several different ways of playing the game in regards to actions required and time spent while still be regarded as a player. Two concrete ways of doing this is through supporting [[Backseat Players]] or [[Functional Roles]], where the roles in the latter case differ in commitment required besides actual gameplay actions provided. Other ways of doing this often build upon making different parts of the game available through different access routes, which means having some gameplay accessible through [[Mediated Gameplay|Mediated]] or [[Ubiquitous Gameplay]]. |
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | [[Mediated Gameplay]] | + | |
| − | + | ||
| − | [[Ubiquitous Gameplay]] | + | |
| − | + | ||
A major design choice for the [[Tiered Participation]] is if the tiers are intended to support different groups of players or to support players in moving between different levels of commitment, or both. [[Wizard's Apprentice]] is an example of the first case (where the wizard player can only increase his or her engagement in the game by being a [[Backseat Players|Backseat Player]]) while the [[Drop-In/Drop-Out]] gameplay in the [[Lego Star Wars series]] support the second case. Most [[:Category:Alternate Reality Games]], e.g. [[Conspiracy for Good]], but especially those tied to TV series (e.g. [[The Truth About Marika]] or [[The Lost Experience]]) support both. | A major design choice for the [[Tiered Participation]] is if the tiers are intended to support different groups of players or to support players in moving between different levels of commitment, or both. [[Wizard's Apprentice]] is an example of the first case (where the wizard player can only increase his or her engagement in the game by being a [[Backseat Players|Backseat Player]]) while the [[Drop-In/Drop-Out]] gameplay in the [[Lego Star Wars series]] support the second case. Most [[:Category:Alternate Reality Games]], e.g. [[Conspiracy for Good]], but especially those tied to TV series (e.g. [[The Truth About Marika]] or [[The Lost Experience]]) support both. | ||
Revision as of 09:38, 31 October 2012
The one-sentence "definition" that should be in italics.
While many people may wish to play a certain game, not all may have the same possibilities to engage in gameplay for the same periods of time or with the same types of activities. Games with Tiered Participation try to solve this issue by having several distinct different ways of playing the game, each which puts different types of requirements on how to play in terms of time spend playing and types of gameplay actions that should be performed.
Contents
Examples
Tiered Participation is most commonly found in Alternate Reality Games such as Conspiracy for Good and Momentum. Wizard's Apprentice is an example of a Computer-Augmented Board Game designed to support one player - typically a parent - that is only moderately interest in the game but instead more interested in supporting the other players - typically children - so they can have an engaging and fun experience.
Weaker examples of the pattern can be found in games where non-players can observe the gameplay and give advice. While this can occur in most games, it is probably the most socially acceptable and less disturbing in Category:Puzzle Games, e.g. Angry Birds or Continuity. The pattern becomes strong when observers can choose to join the game and become players, as is supported for example Gauntlet or Lego Star Wars series.
Using the pattern
The main requirement of Tiered Participation is rather obviously that there should be several different ways of playing the game in regards to actions required and time spent while still be regarded as a player. Two concrete ways of doing this is through supporting Backseat Players or Functional Roles, where the roles in the latter case differ in commitment required besides actual gameplay actions provided. Other ways of doing this often build upon making different parts of the game available through different access routes, which means having some gameplay accessible through Mediated or Ubiquitous Gameplay.
A major design choice for the Tiered Participation is if the tiers are intended to support different groups of players or to support players in moving between different levels of commitment, or both. Wizard's Apprentice is an example of the first case (where the wizard player can only increase his or her engagement in the game by being a Backseat Player) while the Drop-In/Drop-Out gameplay in the Lego Star Wars series support the second case. Most Category:Alternate Reality Games, e.g. Conspiracy for Good, but especially those tied to TV series (e.g. The Truth About Marika or The Lost Experience) support both.
Consequences
Can Instantiate
Relations
Can Instantiate
Can Modulate
-
Can Be Instantiated By
Backseat Players, Drop-In/Drop-Out, Functional Roles, Mediated Gameplay, Ubiquitous Gameplay
Can Be Modulated By
-
Possible Closure Effects
-
Potentially Conflicting With
-
History
New pattern created in this wiki. See the paper Emerging Participatory Culture Practices: Player-Created Tiers in Alternate Reality Games[1] for the first academic treatment of the concept.
References
- ↑ Dena, C. (2008). Emerging Participatory Culture Practices: Player-Created Tiers in Alternate Reality Games. Convergence (14), 1, 41-57. Sage.
Acknowledgements
-
