Difference between revisions of "Player Balance"
(→Using the pattern) |
(→Using the pattern) |
||
Line 30: | Line 30: | ||
== Using the pattern == | == Using the pattern == | ||
− | Many patterns that can affect [[Player Balance]] do this by having modifying the fortunes of players opposed to each other. That is, they are applicable in games with [[PvP]] or [[TvT]] gameplay. [[Balancing Effects]], [[Dynamic Difficulty Adjustment]] and [[Handicap Systems]] are all generic ways of doing this with [[Symmetry]] being the most generic. | + | Many patterns that can affect [[Player Balance]] do this by having modifying the fortunes of players opposed to each other. That is, they are applicable in games with [[PvP]] or [[TvT]] gameplay. [[Balancing Effects]], [[Dynamic Difficulty Adjustment]] and [[Handicap Systems]] are all generic ways of doing this with [[Symmetry]] being the most generic. [[Team Development]] can provide [[Player Balance]] if the possibility for development or amount of development is affected by the relative position of players. This can work both in games with [[TvT]] and [[PvP]] gameplay since a player may control a whole [[Teams|Team]] in games with [[PvP]] gameplay. [[Team Development]] can also let players modify their [[Abilities]], [[Powers]], etc. to be better suited against the other players' strategies. The same applies for games with [[Drafting]]. |
+ | [[Player Balance]] can also be achieved in [[PvP]] games through having [[Evolving Rule Sets]] so differences in power between different ways of playing can be evened out over time (one example of a game that does this is [[Magic: the Gathering]]). | ||
− | [[ | + | Regardless of if games have [[Teams]] or not, [[Self-Facilitated Games]] can have [[Player Balance]] since the players themselves can modify game states and ignore rules for the purpose to balancing the gameplay. |
− | + | ||
+ | , [[Killcams]], [[Sanctioned Cheating]], with [[PvP]] | ||
[[Orthogonal Differentiation]] with [[TvT]] | [[Orthogonal Differentiation]] with [[TvT]] |
Revision as of 21:22, 19 March 2018
Design structures in a game which works towards players having equal chances of succeeding with actions in a game or with winning the game.
This pattern is a still a stub.
Most players want games to have the mechanics that give them the same or better chances to win or succeed with actions as other players. As this typically means that all players need the same chances to win or succeed, most games try to have Player Balance. However, this Player Balance does not usually consider the skill of players and usually only apply to the beginning of games.
Example: the symmetry in traditional board games such as Chess or Go guarantee a high level of initial Player Balance, although being the first player to do a move usually has some advantage.
Example: fighting games can allow players to modify their health by a percentage to give different players different health values and thereby counter imbalances in the skill of damaging the opponent.
Note: this pattern is categorized as a Subjective Pattern since players may have subjective feelings if the design structures in place are good enough (or too good) at balancing the fortunes of all players.
Contents
Examples
Anti-Examples
optional
Using the pattern
Many patterns that can affect Player Balance do this by having modifying the fortunes of players opposed to each other. That is, they are applicable in games with PvP or TvT gameplay. Balancing Effects, Dynamic Difficulty Adjustment and Handicap Systems are all generic ways of doing this with Symmetry being the most generic. Team Development can provide Player Balance if the possibility for development or amount of development is affected by the relative position of players. This can work both in games with TvT and PvP gameplay since a player may control a whole Team in games with PvP gameplay. Team Development can also let players modify their Abilities, Powers, etc. to be better suited against the other players' strategies. The same applies for games with Drafting.
Player Balance can also be achieved in PvP games through having Evolving Rule Sets so differences in power between different ways of playing can be evened out over time (one example of a game that does this is Magic: the Gathering).
Regardless of if games have Teams or not, Self-Facilitated Games can have Player Balance since the players themselves can modify game states and ignore rules for the purpose to balancing the gameplay.
, Killcams, Sanctioned Cheating, with PvP
Orthogonal Differentiation with TvT
Can Modulate
Can Be Instantiated By
Dedicated Game Facilitators, Diminishing Returns, Free Game Element Manipulation, Game Masters, Negative Feedback Loops, Negotiation, Paper-Rock-Scissors, Player Augmentations, Player-Decided Results, Privileged Abilities, Public Player Statistics, Randomness, Symmetric Goals, Symmetry, Variable Accuracy
Sanctioned Cheating in Multiplayer Games
Power-Ups together with Randomness
Can Be Modulated By
Ability Losses, Challenging Gameplay, Decreased Abilities, Enemies, Non-Renewable Resources, Reconfigurable Game World, Red Queen Dilemmas, Role Reversal, Spawning, Supporting Goals, Symmetric Resource Distribution, Tournaments
Potentially Conflicting With
AI Players, Asymmetric Abilities, Asymmetric Goals, Asymmetric Resource Distribution, Asymmetric Starting Conditions, Camping, Combos, Early Leaving Players, Empowerment, Enemies, Entitled Players, Extra Turns, First Player Advantages, Flip-Flop Events, Geometric Rewards for Investments, Invulnerabilities, Late Arriving Players, Multiplayer Games, New Abilities, Non-Player Help, Player Augmentations, Player Killing, Positive Feedback Loops, Power-Ups, Privileged Abilities, Privileged Movement, Procedurally Generated Game Worlds, Purchasable Game Advantages, Reconfigurable Game Worlds, Red Queen Dilemmas, Strategic Locations, Tiered Participation, Weapons
Abstract Player Constructs and Characters in games with Asymmetric Starting Conditions
Heterogeneous Game Element Ownership in games with Combos
Gameplay Mastery in games with Player/Character Skill Composites
Gameplay Mastery, Skills, Tools, or Vehicles in Multiplayer Games
Late Arriving Players in games with Player Characters that are subject to Game Element Insertion
Persistent Game Worlds when Abstract Player Construct Development, Character Development, or Crafting exists in the Multiplayer Games
Diegetic Aspects
Interface Aspects
Narration Aspects
Consequences
One effect of providing Player Balance to a game is that it can let players have an Determinable Chance to Succeed.
Relations
Can Instantiate
Determinable Chance to Succeed
Can Modulate
Can Be Instantiated By
Dedicated Game Facilitators, Diminishing Returns, Free Game Element Manipulation, Game Masters, Negative Feedback Loops, Negotiation, Paper-Rock-Scissors, Player Augmentations, Player-Decided Results, Privileged Abilities, Public Player Statistics, Randomness, Symmetric Goals, Symmetry, Variable Accuracy
Sanctioned Cheating in Multiplayer Games
Balancing Effects, Drafting, Dynamic Difficulty Adjustment, Evolving Rule Sets, Handicap Systems, Killcams, Orthogonal Differentiation, Sanctioned Cheating, Self-Facilitated Games, Symmetry, Team Development in games with PvP
Balancing Effects, Drafting, Dynamic Difficulty Adjustment, Handicap Systems, Orthogonal Differentiation, Self-Facilitated Games, Symmetry, Team Development in games with TvT
Power-Ups together with Randomness
Can Be Modulated By
Ability Losses, Challenging Gameplay, Decreased Abilities, Enemies, Non-Renewable Resources, Reconfigurable Game World, Red Queen Dilemmas, Role Reversal, Spawning, Supporting Goals, Symmetric Resource Distribution, Tournaments
Possible Closure Effects
-
Potentially Conflicting With
AI Players, Asymmetric Abilities, Asymmetric Goals, Asymmetric Resource Distribution, Asymmetric Starting Conditions, Camping, Combos, Early Leaving Players, Empowerment, Enemies, Entitled Players, Extra Turns, First Player Advantages, Flip-Flop Events, Geometric Rewards for Investments, Invulnerabilities, Late Arriving Players, Multiplayer Games, New Abilities, Non-Player Help, Player Augmentations, Player Killing, Positive Feedback Loops, Power-Ups, Privileged Abilities, Privileged Movement, Procedurally Generated Game Worlds, Purchasable Game Advantages, Reconfigurable Game Worlds, Red Queen Dilemmas, Strategic Locations, Tiered Participation, Weapons
Abstract Player Constructs and Characters in games with Asymmetric Starting Conditions
Heterogeneous Game Element Ownership in games with Combos
Gameplay Mastery in games with Player/Character Skill Composites
Gameplay Mastery, Skills, Tools, or Vehicles in Multiplayer Games
Late Arriving Players in games with Player Characters that are subject to Game Element Insertion
Persistent Game Worlds when Abstract Player Construct Development, Character Development, or Crafting exists in the Multiplayer Games
History
An updated version of the pattern Player Balance that was part of the original collection in the book Patterns in Game Design[1].
References
- ↑ Björk, S. & Holopainen, J. (2004) Patterns in Game Design. Charles River Media. ISBN1-58450-354-8.
Acknowledgements
-