Difference between revisions of "Player Balance"

Revision as of 15:40, 21 March 2018

Design structures in a game which works towards players having equal chances of succeeding with actions in a game or with winning the game.

This pattern is a still a stub.

Most players want games to have the mechanics that give them the same or better chances to win or succeed with actions as other players. As this typically means that all players need the same chances to win or succeed, most games try to have Player Balance. However, this Player Balance does not usually consider the skill of players and usually only apply to the beginning of games.

Note: this pattern is categorized as a Subjective Pattern since players may have subjective feelings if the design structures in place are good enough (or too good) at balancing the fortunes of all players.

Examples

The symmetry in traditional board games such as Chess or Go guarantee a high level of initial Player Balance, although being the first player to do a move usually has some advantage. Go has handicap systems to even further balance starting positions by giving stones (points) to the player that is not the first player.

Fighting games, i.e. the Mortal Kombat series or the Tekken series, can allow players to modify individual attack strengths or how much damage their characters individually can take to counter imbalances in the skill of damaging the opponent.

Racing games such as the Mario Kart series and Super Monkey Ball series have mechanics to provide benefits for those not leading races. In the Mario Kart series leaders cannot get all power-ups and some power-ups specifically target the leaders. In the Super Monkey Ball series leaders have lower top speeds (which can make certain jumps more difficult or impossible).

Using the pattern

Many patterns that can affect Player Balance do this by having modifying the fortunes of players opposed to each other. That is, they are applicable in games with PvP or TvT gameplay. Balancing Effects, Dynamic Difficulty Adjustment and Handicap Systems are all generic ways of doing this with Symmetry being the most generic. Team Development can provide Player Balance if the possibility for development or amount of development is affected by the relative position of players. This can work both in games with TvT and PvP gameplay since a player may control a whole Team in games with PvP gameplay. Team Development can also let players modify their Abilities, Powers, etc. to be better suited against the other players' strategies. The same applies for games with Drafting.

Player Balance can also be achieved in PvP games through having Evolving Rule Sets so differences in power between different ways of playing can be evened out over time (one example of a game that does this is Magic: The Gathering). Sanctioned Cheating is another way in PvP games since those players that are disadvantaged often can have bigger gains from engaging in Sanctioned Cheating without necessarily suffering bigger losses if their cheating is revealed. Killcams in PvP games can let players learn about what they or other did to get killed (or to kill someone else) as well as expose killers strategies and locations. Specifically for TvT games, differences in strengths and weaknesses between individual team members can be mitigated through Orthogonal Differentiation within the Teams so the total effect is that the Teams are balanced and therefore a version of Player Balance is achieved (one has the same chance of belong to a winning team). Regardless of if games have Teams or not, Self-Facilitated Games can have Player Balance since the players themselves can modify game states and ignore rules for the purpose to balancing the gameplay.

Can Be Instantiated By

Dedicated Game Facilitators, Diminishing Returns, Free Game Element Manipulation, Game Masters, Negative Feedback Loops, Negotiation, Paper-Rock-Scissors, Player Augmentations, Player-Decided Results, Privileged Abilities, Public Player Statistics, Randomness, Symmetric Goals, Symmetry, Variable Accuracy

Sanctioned Cheating in Multiplayer Games

Power-Ups together with Randomness

Can Be Modulated By

Ability Losses, Challenging Gameplay, Decreased Abilities, Enemies, Non-Renewable Resources, Reconfigurable Game World, Red Queen Dilemmas, Role Reversal, Spawning, Supporting Goals, Symmetric Resource Distribution, Tournaments

The main challenge with having Player Balance in a game is that so many other design features can work against it. The primary one is Multiplayer Games which is also the pattern that makes there be a need for Player Balance. Other central challenges to Player Balance come from patterns that cause asymmetry between players in their possibilities to compete with each other, i.e. Asymmetric Abilities, Asymmetric Goals, Asymmetric Resource Distribution, and Asymmetric Starting Conditions. Many patterns relate to some of these asymmetries and to players, i.e. players having too powerful Abilities due to being AI Players, Entitled Players, being in high tiers in games with Tiered Participation, or having Player Augmentations (but the last one of these can also be used to boost to Abilities of disadvantaged players). Others, e.g. Invulnerabilities, Privileged Abilities, and Privileged Movement, cause imbalances in Abilities. These imbalances may also be caused by imbalances in how Skills, Strategic Locations, Tools, Vehicles, or Weapons are distributed, which makes Procedurally Generated Game Worlds a potential source for such imbalances as well.

Asymmetry regarding resources and starting conditions may also come from games having First Player Advantages, allowing Early Leaving Players, or having to deal with Late Arriving Players (especially in games where their Player Characters are subject to Game Element Insertion) or players that become potential Kingmakers. Players have support due to external reasons, e.g. Non-Player Help or Purchasable Game Advantages, can easily also destroy Player Balance. Finally, players who are good at a game, i.e. have Gameplay Mastery, automatically break Player Balance unless all players have the same level of Gameplay Mastery. This issue can be compounded by imbalances in Abilities or Skills, i.e. games with Player/Character Skill Composites.

potentially conflicting with

Camping, Combos, Empowerment, Enemies, Extra Turns, Flip-Flop Events, Geometric Rewards for Investments, New Abilities, Player Killing, Positive Feedback Loops, Power-Ups, Reconfigurable Game Worlds, Red Queen Dilemmas,

Abstract Player Constructs and Characters in games with Asymmetric Starting Conditions

Heterogeneous Game Element Ownership in games with Combos

Persistent Game Worlds when Abstract Player Construct Development, Character Development, or Crafting exists in the Multiplayer Games

Diegetic Aspects

Interface Aspects

Narration Aspects

Consequences

One effect of providing Player Balance to a game is that it can let players have an Determinable Chance to Succeed. The presence of Player Balance naturally affects Competition and Gameplay Mastery but does not necessarily work against them. Instead, they can strive to make Competitions last longer and require more of players to show that they have Gameplay Mastery.

Relations

Can Instantiate

Determinable Chance to Succeed

Can Modulate

Competition, Gameplay Mastery

Can Be Instantiated By

Dedicated Game Facilitators, Diminishing Returns, Free Game Element Manipulation, Game Masters, Negative Feedback Loops, Negotiation, Paper-Rock-Scissors, Player Augmentations, Player-Decided Results, Privileged Abilities, Public Player Statistics, Randomness, Symmetric Goals, Symmetry, Variable Accuracy

Sanctioned Cheating in Multiplayer Games

Balancing Effects, Drafting, Dynamic Difficulty Adjustment, Evolving Rule Sets, Handicap Systems, Killcams, Orthogonal Differentiation, Sanctioned Cheating, Self-Facilitated Games, Symmetry, Team Development in games with PvP

Balancing Effects, Drafting, Dynamic Difficulty Adjustment, Handicap Systems, Orthogonal Differentiation, Self-Facilitated Games, Symmetry, Team Development in games with TvT

Power-Ups together with Randomness

Can Be Modulated By

Ability Losses, Challenging Gameplay, Decreased Abilities, Enemies, Non-Renewable Resources, Reconfigurable Game World, Red Queen Dilemmas, Role Reversal, Spawning, Supporting Goals, Symmetric Resource Distribution, Tournaments

Possible Closure Effects

-

Potentially Conflicting With

AI Players, Asymmetric Abilities, Asymmetric Goals, Asymmetric Resource Distribution, Asymmetric Starting Conditions, Camping, Combos, Early Leaving Players, Empowerment, Enemies, Entitled Players, Extra Turns, First Player Advantages, Flip-Flop Events, Geometric Rewards for Investments, Invulnerabilities, Kingmaker, Late Arriving Players, Multiplayer Games, New Abilities, Non-Player Help, Player Augmentations, Player Killing, Positive Feedback Loops, Power-Ups, Privileged Abilities, Privileged Movement, Procedurally Generated Game Worlds, Purchasable Game Advantages, Reconfigurable Game Worlds, Red Queen Dilemmas, Strategic Locations, Tiered Participation

Abstract Player Constructs and Characters in games with Asymmetric Starting Conditions

Heterogeneous Game Element Ownership in games with Combos

Gameplay Mastery in games with Player/Character Skill Composites

Gameplay Mastery, Skills, Tools, Vehicles, or Weapons in Multiplayer Games

Late Arriving Players in games with Player Characters that are subject to Game Element Insertion

Persistent Game Worlds when Abstract Player Construct Development, Character Development, or Crafting exists in the Multiplayer Games

History

An updated version of the pattern Player Balance that was part of the original collection in the book Patterns in Game Design^[1].

References

1. ↑ Björk, S. & Holopainen, J. (2004) Patterns in Game Design. Charles River Media. ISBN1-58450-354-8.

Acknowledgements

-